Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K302012:Experience"
RachelBoyd (Talk | contribs) (→Figure 4:) |
RachelBoyd (Talk | contribs) (→Figure 8:) |
||
Line 124: | Line 124: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Image:Teamnewcastle_yneA168BS.jpg|300px]][[Image:Teamnewcastle_1indBS2.jpg|300px]] | |[[Image:Teamnewcastle_yneA168BS.jpg|300px]][[Image:Teamnewcastle_1indBS2.jpg|300px]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
|'''Figure8''': ''Bacillus subtilis'' 168 cells (left) and cells induced at 1mM IPTG(right) | |'''Figure8''': ''Bacillus subtilis'' 168 cells (left) and cells induced at 1mM IPTG(right) | ||
|} | |} |
Revision as of 17:43, 27 October 2010
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_K302012
Characterisation by Team Newcastle 2010
We integrated our part into the Bacillus subtilis 168 chromosome at amyE (using the integration vector pGFP-rrnB) and selected for integration by testing for the ability to hydrolyse starch. Homologous recombination at amyE destroys endogenous expression of amylase. Colonies that are not able to break down starch on agar plate do not have a white halo when exposed to iodine.
The part was co-transcribed with gfp fluorescent marker by transcriptional fusion after the yneA coding sequence.
We characterised the part first without, and then with, LacI repression (using the integration vector pMutin4 to integrate lacI into the Bacillus subtilis 168 chromosome).
Table1:
Stats: | 168 | yneA | pMutin4 0μM IPTG | pMutin4 1μM IPTG |
---|---|---|---|---|
Average: | 1.34μm | 3.53μm | 1.74μm | 3.19μm |
Max: | 2.30μm | 6.00μm | 3.62μm | 9.77μm |
Min: | 0.55μm | 1.31μm | 0.88μm | 1.14μm |
Median: | 1.33μm | 3.27μm | 1.62μm | 2.66μm |
Standard Deviation: | 0.32μm | 1.01μm | 0.80μm | 1.56μm |
Figure1:
Figure2:
Figure 3:
Figure 3 shows the percentage of cells at different lengths (μm) uninduced |
Figure 4:
Figure 4:Bacillus subtilis 168 cells (left) and non-induced cells (right) |
Figure 5:
Figure 5 shows the percentage of cells at different lengths(μm)induced at 0.2mM IPTG |
Figure 6:
Figure 6: Bacillus subtilis 168 cells (left) and cells induced at 0.2mM IPTG (right) |
Figure 7:
Figure 7: shows the percentage of cells at different lengths (μm) induced at 1mM IPTG |
Figure 8:
Figure8: Bacillus subtilis 168 cells (left) and cells induced at 1mM IPTG(right) |
Figures 2,3 and 4 show a greater proportion of cells at a higher concentration of IPTG(1mM IPTG), compared with Bacillus subtilis 168 our control population.
User Reviews
UNIQ2f4380ab36f12ed3-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ2f4380ab36f12ed3-partinfo-00000001-QINU