Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K404003"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<head> | <head> | ||
<title>BBa_K404003</title> | <title>BBa_K404003</title> | ||
− | |||
</head> | </head> | ||
<body> | <body> | ||
Line 63: | Line 62: | ||
lang="EN-US">Mutations implemented into <i>RepVP123</i> | lang="EN-US">Mutations implemented into <i>RepVP123</i> | ||
in order to establish both iGEM standard and loop insertion capability. | in order to establish both iGEM standard and loop insertion capability. | ||
− | Green arrows indicate integrated restriction sites, | + | Green arrows indicate integrated restriction sites, red arrows |
indicate deleted restriction sites. KpnI was deleted first and | indicate deleted restriction sites. KpnI was deleted first and | ||
− | reinstated | + | reinstated later. (see text).</span></p> |
</td> | </td> | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
Line 657: | Line 656: | ||
lang="EN-US">Making | lang="EN-US">Making | ||
the <i>RepVP123</i> | the <i>RepVP123</i> | ||
− | wild-type compatible with the iGEM standards required the removal of | + | wild-type construct compatible with the iGEM standards required the removal of |
five | five | ||
restriction sites (see </span><span lang="EN-US">Figure | restriction sites (see </span><span lang="EN-US">Figure | ||
Line 674: | Line 673: | ||
the <i>rep</i> gene using HindIII and SwaI, which are | the <i>rep</i> gene using HindIII and SwaI, which are | ||
single-cutting | single-cutting | ||
− | restriction enzymes adjacent to the target area. | + | restriction enzymes adjacent to the target area. Furthermore, BamHI |
(859) and | (859) and | ||
SalI (1239) were removed, because these enzymes were required for | SalI (1239) were removed, because these enzymes were required for | ||
Line 689: | Line 688: | ||
the gene coding for the VP proteins was modified as well. The | the gene coding for the VP proteins was modified as well. The | ||
introduction of | introduction of | ||
− | these restriction required up to four base | + | these restriction required up to four base modifications in a row, hence it |
was | was | ||
decided to synthesize this gene fragment and replace the wild-type | decided to synthesize this gene fragment and replace the wild-type | ||
Line 727: | Line 726: | ||
style="text-indent: 0cm; line-height: 150%;"><span | style="text-indent: 0cm; line-height: 150%;"><span | ||
lang="EN-US">To | lang="EN-US">To | ||
− | fulfill iGEM requirements all plasmids need to be submitted in pSB1C3 | + | fulfill iGEM requirements, all plasmids need to be submitted in pSB1C3. |
− | + | Therefore, primers were ordered for amplifying <i>RepVP123</i> | |
containing all | containing all | ||
− | modifications done so far by PCR and cloning | + | modifications done so far by PCR and cloning them into pSB1C3. Still, |
pSB1C3 | pSB1C3 | ||
contains two restriction sites for SspI and PvuII restriction enzymes | contains two restriction sites for SspI and PvuII restriction enzymes | ||
Line 773: | Line 772: | ||
the newly constructed pSB1C3_001. Testing this newly assembled plasmid | the newly constructed pSB1C3_001. Testing this newly assembled plasmid | ||
in cell | in cell | ||
− | culture revealed unexpected data | + | culture revealed unexpected data: Not only did the newly assembled |
plasmid work | plasmid work | ||
(see Figure 10), but in comparison to pAAV containing the same <i>RepVP123</i> | (see Figure 10), but in comparison to pAAV containing the same <i>RepVP123</i> | ||
Line 780: | Line 779: | ||
Although exact reasons are still unknown, these results are probably | Although exact reasons are still unknown, these results are probably | ||
related to | related to | ||
− | the | + | the length reduction of pSB1C3_001 compared to the original pAAV plasmid |
of | of | ||
approximately 1000 base pairs.</span></p> | approximately 1000 base pairs.</span></p> | ||
Line 807: | Line 806: | ||
pSB1C3_[AAV2]-left-ITR_pCMV_beta-globin_mVenus_hGH_[AAV2]-right-ITR | pSB1C3_[AAV2]-left-ITR_pCMV_beta-globin_mVenus_hGH_[AAV2]-right-ITR | ||
providing essential genes and proteins for producing viral particles. | providing essential genes and proteins for producing viral particles. | ||
− | + | 48 hours post transfection, viral particles were harvested by | |
freeze-thaw lysis and centrifugation followed by HT1080 transduction. | freeze-thaw lysis and centrifugation followed by HT1080 transduction. | ||
− | mVenus expression of viral genomes was determined by flow | + | mVenus expression of viral genomes was determined by flow cytometry analysis |
− | + | 24 hours post infection. </span><span | |
style="color: windowtext; font-weight: normal;" lang="EN-US">Fluorescence | style="color: windowtext; font-weight: normal;" lang="EN-US">Fluorescence | ||
is measured in surviving cells.</span><span | is measured in surviving cells.</span><span | ||
style="color: windowtext; font-weight: normal;" lang="EN-US"> Results | style="color: windowtext; font-weight: normal;" lang="EN-US"> Results | ||
showed functionality of <i>RepVP123</i> | showed functionality of <i>RepVP123</i> | ||
− | within pSB1C3_001 vector and additionally increased transduction | + | within the pSB1C3_001 vector and additionally increased transduction |
efficiency.</span></p> | efficiency.</span></p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 828: | Line 827: | ||
lang="EN-US">Shutting-down | lang="EN-US">Shutting-down | ||
the | the | ||
− | natural viral tropism is essential for targeting | + | natural viral tropism is essential for specific targeting of tumor |
cells and | cells and | ||
not infecting healthy cells. Therefore, the iGEM team Freiburg_Bioware | not infecting healthy cells. Therefore, the iGEM team Freiburg_Bioware | ||
Line 837: | Line 836: | ||
knock-out was | knock-out was | ||
cloned by designing primers containing the required base exchanges and | cloned by designing primers containing the required base exchanges and | ||
− | performing a SDM. | + | performing a SDM. As before, this <i>RepVP123</i> |
variant was tested | variant was tested | ||
− | in cell culture | + | in cell culture and evaluated as well by flow cytometry. Results show |
that | that | ||
mutation of HSPG-binding motif has severe impact on transduction | mutation of HSPG-binding motif has severe impact on transduction | ||
− | efficiency | + | efficiency, |
thus enabling a viral particle carrying this knock-out and additional | thus enabling a viral particle carrying this knock-out and additional | ||
targeting | targeting | ||
− | motifs, e.g. within the loops or presented via N-terminal fusion to | + | motifs, e.g. within the loops or presented via N-terminal fusion, to |
bind target | bind target | ||
− | cells’ receptors | + | cells’ receptors. Consequently, target cells are infected at a much higher |
rate | rate | ||
compared to unspecific infection of other cell types within an organism | compared to unspecific infection of other cell types within an organism | ||
Line 856: | Line 855: | ||
quantify | quantify | ||
differences in infectivity, the infectious titer of viral particles | differences in infectivity, the infectious titer of viral particles | ||
− | + | made up of | |
<i>RepVP123</i> with and without HSPG binding motif was | <i>RepVP123</i> with and without HSPG binding motif was | ||
determined by qPCR (see | determined by qPCR (see | ||
Line 864: | Line 863: | ||
lines. Results show that the implemented HSPG-knock-out verifies | lines. Results show that the implemented HSPG-knock-out verifies | ||
results obtained | results obtained | ||
− | from flow cytometry | + | from flow cytometry: Infectious titers severely dropped compared to <i>RepVP123</i> |
− | with intact HSPG binding motif.</span></p> | + | with an intact HSPG binding motif.</span></p> |
<table class="MsoTableGrid" | <table class="MsoTableGrid" | ||
style="border: medium none ; border-collapse: collapse; text-align: left; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" | style="border: medium none ; border-collapse: collapse; text-align: left; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;" | ||
Line 882: | Line 881: | ||
lang="EN-US">12</span> <span | lang="EN-US">12</span> <span | ||
style="color: windowtext; font-weight: normal;" lang="EN-US">Alignment | style="color: windowtext; font-weight: normal;" lang="EN-US">Alignment | ||
− | of 587 loop within viral VP123: The upper sequence | + | of 587 loop within viral VP123: The upper sequence contains the HSPG binding motif (AGA, in red boxes), the lower |
− | + | ||
sequence contains the HSPG-ko introduced by the iGEM team | sequence contains the HSPG-ko introduced by the iGEM team | ||
Freiburg_Bioware 2010 (GCT and GCC, blue boxes).</span></p> | Freiburg_Bioware 2010 (GCT and GCC, blue boxes).</span></p> | ||
Line 943: | Line 941: | ||
the HSPG binding motif reduces infectious titer in both HT1080 and HeLa | the HSPG binding motif reduces infectious titer in both HT1080 and HeLa | ||
cell lines. For A431 cells, no infectious titer could be detected via | cell lines. For A431 cells, no infectious titer could be detected via | ||
− | qPCR, which is probably related to poor transduction efficiency of A431 | + | qPCR, which is probably related to the poor transduction efficiency of A431 |
cells.</span></p> | cells.</span></p> | ||
</td> | </td> | ||
Line 957: | Line 955: | ||
p5 promoter, the iGEM team Freiburg 2010 provides the RepCap plasmid | p5 promoter, the iGEM team Freiburg 2010 provides the RepCap plasmid | ||
with a | with a | ||
− | relocated p5 promoter | + | relocated p5 promoter. Downstream of the <i>RepCap</i> |
genes (see </span><span lang="EN-US">Figure 1</span><span | genes (see </span><span lang="EN-US">Figure 1</span><span | ||
− | lang="EN-US">) | + | lang="EN-US">), this p5 promoter lacks |
the TATA box element </span><span lang="EN-US">(AVIGEN, | the TATA box element </span><span lang="EN-US">(AVIGEN, | ||
1997)</span><b><span lang="EN-US">. </span></b><span | 1997)</span><b><span lang="EN-US">. </span></b><span | ||
− | lang="EN-US"> | + | lang="EN-US">These modifications result in an attenuated |
expression of the larger | expression of the larger | ||
− | Rep proteins | + | Rep proteins leading to normal transcription of the Rep |
proteins | proteins | ||
driven by p19 promoter and enhanced expression of the Cap proteins, | driven by p19 promoter and enhanced expression of the Cap proteins, | ||
which are | which are | ||
− | under the control of the p40 promoter. | + | under the control of the p40 promoter. Furthermore, removing the p5 |
promoter | promoter | ||
downstream of the <i>RepCap</i> genes and deletion of the | downstream of the <i>RepCap</i> genes and deletion of the | ||
TATA box eliminates | TATA box eliminates | ||
− | contamination with wtAAVs. Hence, alteration of the p5 promoter is | + | contamination with wtAAVs [Natsoulis, G., 1997]. Hence, alteration of the p5 promoter is |
useful for | useful for | ||
− | enhanced production of recombinant viral particles attenuating | + | enhanced production of recombinant viral particles by attenuating |
repression of | repression of | ||
Rep78/68 and improving gene transcription of the capsid proteins and | Rep78/68 and improving gene transcription of the capsid proteins and | ||
Rep | Rep | ||
− | proteins involved in genome packaging. </span></p> | + | proteins which are involved in genome packaging. </span></p> |
<div align="center"> | <div align="center"> | ||
<table class="MsoTableGrid" | <table class="MsoTableGrid" | ||
Line 1,015: | Line 1,013: | ||
<p style="margin-left: 24pt; text-indent: -24pt;"><span | <p style="margin-left: 24pt; text-indent: -24pt;"><span | ||
style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif";" | style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: "Calibri","sans-serif";" | ||
− | lang="EN-US"> | + | lang="EN-US">Natsoulis, G., United States Patent 5,622,856 (1997).</span></p> |
− | + | ||
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p> | <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US"> </span></p> | ||
</div> | </div> |
Revision as of 11:26, 27 October 2010
[AAV2]-Rep-VP123(ViralBrick-587KO-empty)_p5-TATAless
Overview of RepVP123 plasmid
Modularization: Overview
In our terminology the term “RepVP123” encompasses the whole AAV2 genome excluding the ITRs. The rep locus comprises four proteins related to genome replication while the cap locus codes for the proteins VP1, VP2, VP3 and the assembly-associated protein (AAP), which are required for viral capsid assembly. Source of the RepVP123 BioBrick supplied within iGEM team Freiburg_Bioware 2010 Virus Construction Kit is the wild-type AAV2 RepVP123, as provided e. g. in the pAAV vector from Stratagene. In order to introduce the iGEM standard and additionally enabling the possibility to modify the viral capsid via integration of certain motives within the viral loops 453 and 587, a total of twelve mutations within RepVP123 (see Figure 1) and additionally two mutations within the pSB1C3 backbone were introduced by either Site-Directed Mutagenesis (SDM) or by ordering and cloning of specifically designed gene sequences matching the required demands. Modifying the pSB1C3 led to iGEM team Freiburg_Bioware’s variant of this backbone, pSB1C3_001.
Figure 1 Mutations implemented into RepVP123 in order to establish both iGEM standard and loop insertion capability. Green arrows indicate integrated restriction sites, red arrows indicate deleted restriction sites. KpnI was deleted first and reinstated later. (see text). |
Plasmid name: |
Functionality (determinded in cell culture via transduction and flow cytometry ): |
4x mutations (PstI (310), BamHI (859), SalI (1239), PstI (4073)) |
inserted rep fragment |
inserted cap fragment |
reinstated KpnI |
pAAV |
pSB1C3_001 |
HSPG-ko |
pAAV_RC (wild-type) |
yes |
|
|
|
|
x |
|
|
pAAV_RC_4x mutant |
yes |
x |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
pAAV_RC_inserts |
no |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
|
pAAV_RC_Cap |
yes |
x |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
pAAV_RC_RepVP123 |
yes |
x |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
pSB1C3_RepVP123_ p5TATAless |
yes |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
|
pSB1C3_RepVP123_ HSPG-ko_p5TATAless |
yes |
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
x |
Figure 2 Table contains complete overview about all plasmids containing RepVP123 which were used by iGEM team Freiburg_Bioware 2010.
Modularization: Removing iGEM restriction sites and establishing loop insertion capability
Modifications in Rep
Figure 3 Restriction sites within the wild-type rep gene sequence, which were removed via cloning of synthetized rep gene fragment into the plasmid. The red box indicates the region spanned by the synthetic sequence. |
Making the RepVP123 wild-type construct compatible with the iGEM standards required the removal of five restriction sites (see Figure 1). This was achieved using site-directed mutagenesis for PstI (position 310) and PstI (4073). The remaining three iGEM restriction sites EcoRI (1578), PstI (1773) and EcoRI (1796) were replaced by a synthetic gene fragment, since the rep ORF contained these restriction sites in close proximity to each other plus an additional KpnI restriction site which was also not desired (see Figure 2). This gene fragment was cloned into the rep gene using HindIII and SwaI, which are single-cutting restriction enzymes adjacent to the target area. Furthermore, BamHI (859) and SalI (1239) were removed, because these enzymes were required for genetically inserting the loop modifications in VP123.
Modifications in VP123
In order to implement the restriction sites necessary for targeting via loop insertions, the gene coding for the VP proteins was modified as well. The introduction of these restriction required up to four base modifications in a row, hence it was decided to synthesize this gene fragment and replace the wild-type sequence in RepVP123 as well.
Figure 4 Restriction sites within cap sequence showing introduced loop insertion restriction sites into cap to enable cloning of targeting or purification motifs into both 453 and 587 loops. Again, the red box indicates gene sequence which was synthetized. |
Modularization: Adapting pSB1C3 to loop insertions – pSB1C3_001
To fulfill iGEM requirements, all plasmids need to be submitted in pSB1C3. Therefore, primers were ordered for amplifying RepVP123 containing all modifications done so far by PCR and cloning them into pSB1C3. Still, pSB1C3 contains two restriction sites for SspI and PvuII restriction enzymes in its CAT marker. Since these are necessary for cloning ViralBricks in this vector, the iGEM Team Freiburg_Bioware 2010 decided in agreement with iGEM Headquarters to implement a new standard for the pSB1C3 backbone which was named pSB1C3_001. Both restriction sites interfering with ViralBrick insertions were mutated to make SspI and PvuII single-cutters (see method development).
Figure 10 Comparison of pSB1C3 (upper row) and pSB1C3_001 (lower row). Deletions of SspI and PvuII are marked by red boxes. |
RepVP123 containing both rep and cap synthetic gene fragments including the re-mutation of KpnI and the downstream p5TATA-less promotor was cloned into the newly constructed pSB1C3_001. Testing this newly assembled plasmid in cell culture revealed unexpected data: Not only did the newly assembled plasmid work (see Figure 10), but in comparison to pAAV containing the same RepVP123 construct, pSB1C3_001 showed an about 3 times higher transduction efficiency. Although exact reasons are still unknown, these results are probably related to the length reduction of pSB1C3_001 compared to the original pAAV plasmid of approximately 1000 base pairs.
Figure 11 AAV-293 cells were transfected with three plasmids pHelper, pSB1C3_001_[AAV2]-Rep-VP123_p5-TATAless or pAAV_RC_IRCK and pSB1C3_[AAV2]-left-ITR_pCMV_beta-globin_mVenus_hGH_[AAV2]-right-ITR providing essential genes and proteins for producing viral particles. 48 hours post transfection, viral particles were harvested by freeze-thaw lysis and centrifugation followed by HT1080 transduction. mVenus expression of viral genomes was determined by flow cytometry analysis 24 hours post infection. Fluorescence is measured in surviving cells. Results showed functionality of RepVP123 within the pSB1C3_001 vector and additionally increased transduction efficiency. |
Turning-off natural tropism: HSPG-knock-out
Shutting-down the natural viral tropism is essential for specific targeting of tumor cells and not infecting healthy cells. Therefore, the iGEM team Freiburg_Bioware 2010 decided to knock-out the viral natural tropism delivered by the heperan sulfate proteoglycan-(HSPG) binding site within the viruses 587 loop. The knock-out was cloned by designing primers containing the required base exchanges and performing a SDM. As before, this RepVP123 variant was tested in cell culture and evaluated as well by flow cytometry. Results show that mutation of HSPG-binding motif has severe impact on transduction efficiency, thus enabling a viral particle carrying this knock-out and additional targeting motifs, e.g. within the loops or presented via N-terminal fusion, to bind target cells’ receptors. Consequently, target cells are infected at a much higher rate compared to unspecific infection of other cell types within an organism (see Figure 12).
To quantify differences in infectivity, the infectious titer of viral particles made up of RepVP123 with and without HSPG binding motif was determined by qPCR (see Figure 14) for different cell lines. Results show that the implemented HSPG-knock-out verifies results obtained from flow cytometry: Infectious titers severely dropped compared to RepVP123 with an intact HSPG binding motif.
Figure 12 Alignment of 587 loop within viral VP123: The upper sequence contains the HSPG binding motif (AGA, in red boxes), the lower sequence contains the HSPG-ko introduced by the iGEM team Freiburg_Bioware 2010 (GCT and GCC, blue boxes). |
Figure 13 Transduction efficiency of HT1080 cells measured by flow cytometry. Fluorescence is measured in surviving cells. Knock-out of HSPG binding motif greatly reduces transduction efficiency compared to RepVP123 containing the motiv. |
Figure 14 Infectious titers of RepVP123 with and without natural HSPG binding motif tested in different cell lines via qPCR. Shutting-down the HSPG binding motif reduces infectious titer in both HT1080 and HeLa cell lines. For A431 cells, no infectious titer could be detected via qPCR, which is probably related to the poor transduction efficiency of A431 cells. |
p5 TATA-less promoter
In contrast to the natural location of the p5 promoter, the iGEM team Freiburg 2010 provides the RepCap plasmid with a relocated p5 promoter. Downstream of the RepCap genes (see Figure 1), this p5 promoter lacks the TATA box element (AVIGEN, 1997). These modifications result in an attenuated expression of the larger Rep proteins leading to normal transcription of the Rep proteins driven by p19 promoter and enhanced expression of the Cap proteins, which are under the control of the p40 promoter. Furthermore, removing the p5 promoter downstream of the RepCap genes and deletion of the TATA box eliminates contamination with wtAAVs [Natsoulis, G., 1997]. Hence, alteration of the p5 promoter is useful for enhanced production of recombinant viral particles by attenuating repression of Rep78/68 and improving gene transcription of the capsid proteins and Rep proteins which are involved in genome packaging.
Figure 1 p5 TATA-less promoter is located downstream of the rep and cap ORF. |
References:
Natsoulis, G., United States Patent 5,622,856 (1997).
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 3611
Illegal XhoI site found at 1913
Illegal XhoI site found at 2099 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 4137
Illegal BsaI site found at 4319
Illegal BsaI site found at 4356
Illegal SapI site found at 3048