Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5236008"
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
After confirming the enhanced efficiency of our enzymes, we have reached the most essential part of our part examination, which is to test if our mutated enzyme is capable of degrading microplastics. We designed two main approaches to validate it. | After confirming the enhanced efficiency of our enzymes, we have reached the most essential part of our part examination, which is to test if our mutated enzyme is capable of degrading microplastics. We designed two main approaches to validate it. | ||
− | First, we employed the scanning electron microscope to observe the morphological changes of the plastic after exposure to E.coli with IsPETase. The results confirm the degradation capacity of the enzyme, as there is a notable change on the surface of the plastic. However, observations are insufficient to prove the effectiveness of our enzymes. Consequently, we conducted an additional experiment utilizing High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). We measured the amount of TPA in the cell culture medium, the peak of IsPETase S121E/R224Q/N233K in E.coli and cyanobacteria reflects the peak of the TPA standard sample, which proves the effectiveness of the microplastic degradation capabilities of our enzymes. | + | First, we employed the scanning electron microscope to observe the morphological changes of the plastic after exposure to E.coli with IsPETase. The results confirm the degradation capacity of the enzyme, as there is a notable change on the surface of the plastic. However, observations are insufficient to prove the effectiveness of our enzymes. Consequently, we conducted an additional experiment utilizing High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). We measured the amount of TPA in the cell culture medium, the peak of IsPETase S121E/R224Q/N233K in E.coli and cyanobacteria reflects the peak of the TPA standard sample, which proves the effectiveness of the microplastic degradation capabilities of our enzymes. To conclude, IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K (891 bp) has been successfully transformed into E.coli. |
<center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/part-images/s121e-esm.png" width = "50%"><br></html></center> | <center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/part-images/s121e-esm.png" width = "50%"><br></html></center> | ||
<center>Fig.7 S121ER224QN233K Electron Scanning Microscope result </center> | <center>Fig.7 S121ER224QN233K Electron Scanning Microscope result </center> |
Revision as of 06:15, 2 October 2024
IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K
Because of the substantial amount of microplastic pollution contaminating our oceans, our project aims to use biosynthetic methods to achieve effective degradation of these compounds in ambient temperatures. Whilst there are existent chemical and biological measures for microplastic degradation, however, chemical means often release chemical byproducts and contaminate the environment, whilst enzymatic degradation can only be done in an environment with specific pH, temperature, and humidity levels.[1] IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K comes from Lu. et al. 2022 but is constructed by us in Escherichia coli. It breaks down polyethylene terephthalate into terephthalic acid through hydrolysis. IsPETase is an enzyme found in Iodeonella sakaiensis that possesses the ability to degrade PET[2].
Usage and Biology
IsPETase is an esterase, specifically designed to break down ester bonds between polyethylene terephthalate, a polymer, into terephthalic acid, a monomer. IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K is a mutated sequence of PETase which enhances its degradation efficiency. It contains mutations at sites S121E, R224Q, and N233K. The mutation at position 121 involves a negative side chain, which enhances its catalytic efficiency. The mutation at position 224 replaces arginine with glutamine, facilitating better substrate access. The mutation at position 233 replaces asparagine by lysin which increases the thermal stability. The mutations were derived from a Transformer model on 1007 homologous PETase protein sequences derived from the UniProt Database using the masked language model (MLM) training method.
Our experimental design was aimed at proving the functionality of our mutated sequences, the viability of E.coli while harboring our sequences, the translational capacity of E.coli and the successful degradation of our mutated enzyme. To validate the functionality of our mutated sequences, we first inserted our genes into plasmid vectors. This process was initiated with the design of specific primers, followed by PCRs. Then, our sequences were recombined into plasmids and transformed into the chassis. In order to assess the part sequences for the mutated IsPETase variants S121E/R224Q/N233K and the functionality of the enzyme, we designed our experiment into two sub-parts. The first is plasmid construction. The second is to test the enzymatic activity. Through conducting colony PCR, we tested whether our parts had been transformed into chassis successfully. The following result of electrophoresis proves that we’ve inserted genes into the chassis since the sequence containing our mutated genes has a total of 891 base pairs with the sequence at the corresponding locations of the marker.
After confirming the integration of IsPETase into our chassis, we proceeded to test whether E.coli could maintain its viability while harboring our genes. Thus, we cultured the bacteria on a petri dish. After a 24-hour incubation period, E. coli grew over the plate, indicating that it can harbor our genes.
We assessed the translational capacity of E.coli and the efficiency of our mutated enzyme. This section presents an analysis of two key results. 1. Enzyme Kinetic: the dynamic curve of our enzyme shows a high efficiency in degrading rate, in which S121E/R224Q/N233K, M10L, H104W, W159H/F229Y outperformed WT IsPETase. We stopped our testing phase at 30 minutes because 2. SDS-PAGE Electrophoresis: the electrophoresis result of our protein validates that our enzyme can successfully synthesize the proteins.
After confirming the enhanced efficiency of our enzymes, we have reached the most essential part of our part examination, which is to test if our mutated enzyme is capable of degrading microplastics. We designed two main approaches to validate it. First, we employed the scanning electron microscope to observe the morphological changes of the plastic after exposure to E.coli with IsPETase. The results confirm the degradation capacity of the enzyme, as there is a notable change on the surface of the plastic. However, observations are insufficient to prove the effectiveness of our enzymes. Consequently, we conducted an additional experiment utilizing High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). We measured the amount of TPA in the cell culture medium, the peak of IsPETase S121E/R224Q/N233K in E.coli and cyanobacteria reflects the peak of the TPA standard sample, which proves the effectiveness of the microplastic degradation capabilities of our enzymes. To conclude, IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K (891 bp) has been successfully transformed into E.coli.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Reference
Lukaszewicz, Paulina, et al. "Plastic Waste Degradation in Landfill Conditions: The Problem with Microplastics, and Their Direct and Indirect Environmental Effects." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 12, 2022, pp. 12345-12367. National Center for Biotechnology Information, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9602440/.
Lu, Hongyuan, et al. “Machine Learning-Aided Engineering of Hydrolases for Pet Depolymerization.” Nature News, Nature Publishing Group, 27 Apr. 2022, www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04599-z.