Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5246034"

(→‎Bioinformatic analysis)
(→‎Experimental characterization)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
===Experimental characterization===
 
===Experimental characterization===
  
−
====Bioinformatic analysis====
+
===Protein expression===
 +
<h2><i>Hirschia baltica</i></h2>
 +
<p>We chose the BL21(DE3) strain for adjustable and efficient expression of target proteins since the system's proteins were best expressed in this strain. Given the lack of time, we went with conditions optimized beforehand in earlier experiments for the whole pathway expression: temperature of 37°C, induction with 0.5 mM IPTG concentration, and expression for 3 hours.</p>
  
−
CDD analysis showed specific hits in glycosyl transferase family 2. This diverse family transfers sugar from UDP-glucose, UDP-N-acetyl-galactosamine, GDP-mannose, or CDP-abequose to a range of substrates. Protein BLAST further supports these findings and suggests that HfsL is most likely a family 2 glycosyltransferase, which has a domain very similar to the poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine synthase domain of biofilm PGA synthase.
+
<p>After SDS-PAGE gel analysis, we concluded that we successfully expressed HfsG, HfsH, HfsK, and HfsL proteins from <i>H. baltica</i>.</p>
  
−
DeepTMHMM analysis suggests that the protein is likely globular and positioned on the inner side of the cell membrane. The AlphaFold 3 structure provides additional evidence supporting its globular shape. A pTM score above 0.5 suggests that the predicted overall structure may closely resemble the true protein fold, while ipTM indicates the accuracy of the subunit positioning within the complex. Values higher than 0.8 represent confident, high-quality predictions.
+
<p><b>HfsL</b> is visible on the right side of the gel (Fig. 1).</p>
  
−
To sum up, HfsL is most probably a globular family 2 glycosyltransferase, responsible for N-acetyl-D-glucosamine transfer to the acceptor molecule, as is further verified by existing research. [1][2][3]
+
<html>
 +
<head>
 +
  <style>
 +
    .container {
 +
      display: flex;
 +
      justify-content: center;
 +
      align-items: flex-start;
 +
      gap: 5px; /* Space between table and figure */
 +
    }
 +
    .table-container {
 +
      margin-right: 10px;
 +
    }
 +
    .figure-container {
 +
      margin-left: 10px;
 +
    }
 +
  </style>
 +
</head>
 +
<body>
 +
  <div class="container">
 +
    <!-- Table on the left -->
 +
    <div class="table-container">
 +
      <h3>Table 1. <i>H. baltica</i> protein sizes in kDa</h3>
 +
      <table border="1">
 +
        <tr>
 +
          <th>Protein Name</th>
 +
          <th>Size (kDa)</th>
 +
        </tr>
 +
        <tr>
 +
          <td>HfsG</td>
 +
          <td>37</td>
 +
        </tr>
 +
        <tr>
 +
          <td>HfsH</td>
 +
          <td>29</td>
 +
        </tr>
 +
        <tr>
 +
          <td>HfsJ</td>
 +
          <td>41</td>
 +
        </tr>
 +
        <tr>
 +
          <td>HfsK</td>
 +
          <td>28</td>
 +
        </tr>
 +
        <tr>
 +
          <td>HfsL</td>
 +
          <td>36</td>
 +
        </tr>
 +
      </table>
 +
    </div>
  
 +
    <!-- Figure on the right -->
 +
    <div class="figure-container">
 +
      <figure>
 +
        <div class="center">
 +
          <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5246/results/protein-expression/baltica-expressions.webp" style="width:500px;">
 +
        </div>
 +
        <figcaption><center><b>Fig. 1.</b> 12% SDS-PAGE analysis of <i>H. baltica</i> in BL21(DE3) before expression and after induction at 0.5 mM IPTG concentrations for 3 hours at 37°C. M - molecular weight ladder in kDa, Pageruler Unstained Protein Ladder, 26614 (Thermo Scientific). </center></figcaption>
 +
      </figure>
 +
    </div>
 +
  </div>
 +
</body>
 +
</html>
  
  
Line 74: Line 136:
 
</body>
 
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>
 +
 +
 +
 +
===References===
 +
1. Hendrickson, H., & Lawrence, J. G. (2000). Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site, not at Ter sites. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 24(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00539.x
 +
<br>
 +
2. Andrews, S. C., Robinson, A. K., & Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. (2004). Bacterial iron homeostasis. Journal of Bacteriology, 186(5), 1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.186.5.1438-1447.2004
 +
<br>
 +
3.Rabah, A., & Hanchi, S. (2023). Experimental and modeling study of the rheological and thermophysical properties of molybdenum disulfide-based nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 384, 123335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123335
 +
<br>
 +
4. Boutte, C. C., & Crosson, S. (2009). Bacterial lifestyle shapes stringent response activation. Journal of Bacteriology, 191(9), 2904-2912. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01003-08
 +
<br>
 +
5. Mackie, J., Liu, Y. C., & DiBartolo, G. (2019). The C-terminal region of the Caulobacter crescentus CtrA protein inhibits stalk synthesis during the G1-to-S transition. mBio, 10(2), e02273-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02273-18
 +
<br>
 +
6.Thanbichler, M., & Shapiro, L. (2003). MipZ, a spatial regulator coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division in Caulobacter. Journal of Bacteriology, 185(4), 1432-1442. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.185.4.1432-1442.2003
 +
<br>
 +
7. Hershey, D.M., Fiebig, A. and Crosson, S. (2019) ‘A genome-wide analysis of adhesion in Caulobacter crescentus identifies new regulatory and biosynthetic components for holdfast assembly’, mBio, 10(1). doi:10.1128/mbio.02273-18.
 +
<br>
 +
8. Chepkwony, N.K., Hardy, G.G. and Brun, Y.V. (2022) ‘HFAE is a component of the holdfast anchor complex that tethers the holdfast adhesin to the cell envelope’, Journal of Bacteriology, 204(11). doi:10.1128/jb.00273-22.
 +
<br>
 +
9. Chepkwony, N.K., Berne, C. and Brun, Y.V. (2019) ‘Comparative analysis of ionic strength tolerance between freshwater and marine Caulobacterales adhesins’, Journal of Bacteriology, 201(18). doi:10.1128/jb.00061-19.
  
 
===References===
 
===References===

Revision as of 21:09, 1 October 2024


HB HfsL Glycosyltransferase, 6xHis tag for purification

Introduction

Usage and Biology

TBA

This part also has a non his-tagged variant BBa_K5246024.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 175
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Experimental characterization

Protein expression

Hirschia baltica

We chose the BL21(DE3) strain for adjustable and efficient expression of target proteins since the system's proteins were best expressed in this strain. Given the lack of time, we went with conditions optimized beforehand in earlier experiments for the whole pathway expression: temperature of 37°C, induction with 0.5 mM IPTG concentration, and expression for 3 hours.

After SDS-PAGE gel analysis, we concluded that we successfully expressed HfsG, HfsH, HfsK, and HfsL proteins from H. baltica.

HfsL is visible on the right side of the gel (Fig. 1).

Table 1. H. baltica protein sizes in kDa

Protein Name Size (kDa)
HfsG 37
HfsH 29
HfsJ 41
HfsK 28
HfsL 36
Fig. 1. 12% SDS-PAGE analysis of H. baltica in BL21(DE3) before expression and after induction at 0.5 mM IPTG concentrations for 3 hours at 37°C. M - molecular weight ladder in kDa, Pageruler Unstained Protein Ladder, 26614 (Thermo Scientific).


Animated Text

This part needs more characterization


References

1. Hendrickson, H., & Lawrence, J. G. (2000). Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site, not at Ter sites. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 24(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00539.x
2. Andrews, S. C., Robinson, A. K., & Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. (2004). Bacterial iron homeostasis. Journal of Bacteriology, 186(5), 1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.186.5.1438-1447.2004
3.Rabah, A., & Hanchi, S. (2023). Experimental and modeling study of the rheological and thermophysical properties of molybdenum disulfide-based nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 384, 123335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123335
4. Boutte, C. C., & Crosson, S. (2009). Bacterial lifestyle shapes stringent response activation. Journal of Bacteriology, 191(9), 2904-2912. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01003-08
5. Mackie, J., Liu, Y. C., & DiBartolo, G. (2019). The C-terminal region of the Caulobacter crescentus CtrA protein inhibits stalk synthesis during the G1-to-S transition. mBio, 10(2), e02273-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02273-18
6.Thanbichler, M., & Shapiro, L. (2003). MipZ, a spatial regulator coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division in Caulobacter. Journal of Bacteriology, 185(4), 1432-1442. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.185.4.1432-1442.2003
7. Hershey, D.M., Fiebig, A. and Crosson, S. (2019) ‘A genome-wide analysis of adhesion in Caulobacter crescentus identifies new regulatory and biosynthetic components for holdfast assembly’, mBio, 10(1). doi:10.1128/mbio.02273-18.
8. Chepkwony, N.K., Hardy, G.G. and Brun, Y.V. (2022) ‘HFAE is a component of the holdfast anchor complex that tethers the holdfast adhesin to the cell envelope’, Journal of Bacteriology, 204(11). doi:10.1128/jb.00273-22.
9. Chepkwony, N.K., Berne, C. and Brun, Y.V. (2019) ‘Comparative analysis of ionic strength tolerance between freshwater and marine Caulobacterales adhesins’, Journal of Bacteriology, 201(18). doi:10.1128/jb.00061-19.

References

1. Hershey, D.M., Fiebig, A. and Crosson, S. (2019) ‘A genome-wide analysis of adhesion in Caulobacter crescentus identifies new regulatory and biosynthetic components for holdfast assembly’, mBio, 10(1). doi:10.1128/mbio.02273-18.
2. Chepkwony, N.K., Hardy, G.G. and Brun, Y.V. (2022) ‘HFAE is a component of the holdfast anchor complex that tethers the holdfast adhesin to the cell envelope’, Journal of Bacteriology, 204(11). doi:10.1128/jb.00273-22.
3. Chepkwony, N.K., Berne, C. and Brun, Y.V. (2019) ‘Comparative analysis of ionic strength tolerance between freshwater and marine Caulobacterales adhesins’, Journal of Bacteriology, 201(18). doi:10.1128/jb.00061-19.