Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5246019"
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
===Introduction===
 
===Introduction===
 +
Vilnius-Lithuania iGEM 2024 project <HTML><b><a href="https://2024.igem.wiki/vilnius-lithuania" target="_blank">Synhesion</a></b></html> aspires to create biodegradable and environmentally friendly adhesives. We were inspired by bacteria, which naturally produce adhesives made from polysaccharides. Two bacteria from aquatic environments - <I> C. crescentus </I> and <I> H. baltica </I> - harness 12 protein synthesis pathways to produce sugars, anchoring them to the surfaces. We aimed to transfer the polysaccharide synthesis pathway to industrially used <I>E. coli</I> bacteria to produce adhesives. Our team concomitantly focused on creating a novel <I>E. coli</I> strain for more efficient production of adhesives.
  
 
===Usage and Biology===
 
===Usage and Biology===
 +
<i>Hirschia baltica</i> is a common marine of the clade <i>Caulobacterales</i>. Its distinguishing feature is its dual lifestyle. Initially, <i>H. baltica</i> daughter cells are in a “swarmer” cell phase, which has a flagellum, enabling them to perform chemotaxis. After the motile phase, they differentiate into “stalked” cells. This phase features a tubular stalk with an adhesive structure called a holdfast, allowing them to adhere to surfaces and perform cell division.[1][2]
 +
</p>
 +
<p style="font-size: 1em;">
 +
Caulobacterales synthesize a polysaccharide-based adhesin known as holdfast at one of their cell poles, enabling tight attachment to external surfaces. It is established that holdfast consists of repeating identical units composed of multiple monomers. Current literature agrees that in Caulobacter crescentus, these units form tetrads composed of glucose, an unidentified monosaccharide (either N-mannosamine uronic acid or xylose), N-acetylglucosamine, and N-glucosamine. These units are polymerized and exported to the outer membrane of the cell, where they function as anchors, securing the bacterium to a surface[3][4].
 +
</p>
 +
<p style="font-size: 1em;">
 +
The <i>H. baltica</i> holdfast is produced via a polysaccharide synthesis and export pathway similar to the group I capsular polysaccharide synthesis Wzy/Wzx-dependent pathway in <i>Escherichia coli</i>.
 +
</p>
 +
<p style="font-size: 1em;">
 +
The holdfast synthesis (<i>hfs</i>) genes include those encoding predicted glycosyltransferases, carbohydrate modification factors, and components of a wzy-type polysaccharide assembly pathway[4][5][6][9].
 +
  
 
The HfsG gene encodes a 331 amino acid protein, homologous to family 2 glycosyltransferases, in Hirschia baltica. This protein transfers sugar units from uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) to the growing chain in synthesizing the holdfast polysaccharide repeat units in the cytoplasm. Studies have shown that HfsG mutants were completely devoid of any holdfast material.  
 
The HfsG gene encodes a 331 amino acid protein, homologous to family 2 glycosyltransferases, in Hirschia baltica. This protein transfers sugar units from uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) to the growing chain in synthesizing the holdfast polysaccharide repeat units in the cytoplasm. Studies have shown that HfsG mutants were completely devoid of any holdfast material.  
Line 21: Line 33:
  
 
===Experimental characterization===
 
===Experimental characterization===
−
 
+
This part needs more characterization.
−
====Bioinformatic analysis====
+
−
 
+
−
CDD and protein BLAST analysis suggest that HfsG is a glucosyltransferase family 2 protein. Proteins of this family are involved in cell wall biosynthesis. HfsG is similar to the WecA protein in E.Coli that catalyzes the transfer of the GlcNAc-1-phosphate moiety from UDP-GlcNAc onto the carrier lipid undecaprenyl phosphate. In the case of HfsG, it catalyzes the transfer of UDP-GlcNAc to the sugar acceptor made earlier in the holdfast synthesis pathway.
+
−
 
+
−
Protein topology analysis using DeepTMHMM suggests that HfsG is a globular protein located in the cytoplasm. AlphaFold 3 structures further confirm it. A pTM score above 0.5 suggests that the predicted overall structure may closely resemble the true protein fold, while ipTM indicates the accuracy of the subunit positioning within the complex. Values higher than 0.8 represent confident, high-quality predictions.
+
−
 
+
−
HfsG is family 2 glycosyltransferase similar to WecA of E.Coli. This globular protein transfers UDP-GlcNAc to the acceptor molecule, our conclusions are in agreement with existing research. [1][2][3]
+
  
 
===References===
 
===References===
−
1. Toh, E., Kurtz, Harry D. and Brun, Y.V. (2008) ‘Characterization of the Caulobacter crescentus holdfast polysaccharide biosynthesis pathway reveals significant redundancy in the initiating glycosyltransferase and polymerase steps’, Journal of Bacteriology, 190(21), pp. 7219–7231. doi:10.1128/jb.01003-08.  
+
1. Hendrickson, H., & Lawrence, J. G. (2000). Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site, not at Ter sites. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 24(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00539.x
 +
<br>
 +
2. Andrews, S. C., Robinson, A. K., & Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. (2004). Bacterial iron homeostasis. Journal of Bacteriology, 186(5), 1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.186.5.1438-1447.2004
 +
<br>
 +
3.Rabah, A., & Hanchi, S. (2023). Experimental and modeling study of the rheological and thermophysical properties of molybdenum disulfide-based nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 384, 123335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123335
 +
<br>
 +
4. Boutte, C. C., & Crosson, S. (2009). Bacterial lifestyle shapes stringent response activation. Journal of Bacteriology, 191(9), 2904-2912. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01003-08
 +
<br>
 +
5. Mackie, J., Liu, Y. C., & DiBartolo, G. (2019). The C-terminal region of the Caulobacter crescentus CtrA protein inhibits stalk synthesis during the G1-to-S transition. mBio, 10(2), e02273-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02273-18
 +
<br>
 +
6.Thanbichler, M., & Shapiro, L. (2003). MipZ, a spatial regulator coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division in Caulobacter. Journal of Bacteriology, 185(4), 1432-1442. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.185.4.1432-1442.2003
 +
<br>
 +
7. Hershey, D.M., Fiebig, A. and Crosson, S. (2019) ‘A genome-wide analysis of adhesion in Caulobacter crescentus identifies new regulatory and biosynthetic components for holdfast assembly’, mBio, 10(1). doi:10.1128/mbio.02273-18.  
 
<br>
 
<br>
−
2. Hardy, G.G. et al. (2018) ‘Mutations in sugar-nucleotide synthesis genes restore holdfast polysaccharide anchoring to Caulobacter crescentus holdfast anchor mutants’, Journal of Bacteriology, 200(3). doi:10.1128/jb.00597-17.
+
8. Chepkwony, N.K., Hardy, G.G. and Brun, Y.V. (2022) ‘HFAE is a component of the holdfast anchor complex that tethers the holdfast adhesin to the cell envelope’, Journal of Bacteriology, 204(11). doi:10.1128/jb.00273-22.  
 
<br>
 
<br>
−
3. Sulkowski, N.I. et al. (2019) ‘A multiprotein complex anchors adhesive holdfast at the outer membrane of Caulobacter crescentus’, Journal of Bacteriology, 201(18). doi:10.1128/jb.00112-19.
+
9. Chepkwony, N.K., Berne, C. and Brun, Y.V. (2019) ‘Comparative analysis of ionic strength tolerance between freshwater and marine Caulobacterales adhesins’, Journal of Bacteriology, 201(18). doi:10.1128/jb.00061-19.

Revision as of 17:34, 1 October 2024


HB HfsG Glycosyltransferase

Introduction

Vilnius-Lithuania iGEM 2024 project Synhesion aspires to create biodegradable and environmentally friendly adhesives. We were inspired by bacteria, which naturally produce adhesives made from polysaccharides. Two bacteria from aquatic environments - C. crescentus and H. baltica - harness 12 protein synthesis pathways to produce sugars, anchoring them to the surfaces. We aimed to transfer the polysaccharide synthesis pathway to industrially used E. coli bacteria to produce adhesives. Our team concomitantly focused on creating a novel E. coli strain for more efficient production of adhesives.

Usage and Biology

Hirschia baltica is a common marine of the clade Caulobacterales. Its distinguishing feature is its dual lifestyle. Initially, H. baltica daughter cells are in a “swarmer” cell phase, which has a flagellum, enabling them to perform chemotaxis. After the motile phase, they differentiate into “stalked” cells. This phase features a tubular stalk with an adhesive structure called a holdfast, allowing them to adhere to surfaces and perform cell division.[1][2] </p>

Caulobacterales synthesize a polysaccharide-based adhesin known as holdfast at one of their cell poles, enabling tight attachment to external surfaces. It is established that holdfast consists of repeating identical units composed of multiple monomers. Current literature agrees that in Caulobacter crescentus, these units form tetrads composed of glucose, an unidentified monosaccharide (either N-mannosamine uronic acid or xylose), N-acetylglucosamine, and N-glucosamine. These units are polymerized and exported to the outer membrane of the cell, where they function as anchors, securing the bacterium to a surface[3][4].

The H. baltica holdfast is produced via a polysaccharide synthesis and export pathway similar to the group I capsular polysaccharide synthesis Wzy/Wzx-dependent pathway in Escherichia coli.

The holdfast synthesis (hfs) genes include those encoding predicted glycosyltransferases, carbohydrate modification factors, and components of a wzy-type polysaccharide assembly pathway[4][5][6][9]. The HfsG gene encodes a 331 amino acid protein, homologous to family 2 glycosyltransferases, in Hirschia baltica. This protein transfers sugar units from uridine diphosphate N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) to the growing chain in synthesizing the holdfast polysaccharide repeat units in the cytoplasm. Studies have shown that HfsG mutants were completely devoid of any holdfast material.

This part also has a his-tagged variant BBa_K5246030.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 852
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 747
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Experimental characterization

This part needs more characterization.

References

1. Hendrickson, H., & Lawrence, J. G. (2000). Mutational bias suggests that replication termination occurs near the dif site, not at Ter sites. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 24(2), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00539.x
2. Andrews, S. C., Robinson, A. K., & Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. (2004). Bacterial iron homeostasis. Journal of Bacteriology, 186(5), 1438–1447. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.186.5.1438-1447.2004
3.Rabah, A., & Hanchi, S. (2023). Experimental and modeling study of the rheological and thermophysical properties of molybdenum disulfide-based nanofluids. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 384, 123335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2023.123335
4. Boutte, C. C., & Crosson, S. (2009). Bacterial lifestyle shapes stringent response activation. Journal of Bacteriology, 191(9), 2904-2912. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.01003-08
5. Mackie, J., Liu, Y. C., & DiBartolo, G. (2019). The C-terminal region of the Caulobacter crescentus CtrA protein inhibits stalk synthesis during the G1-to-S transition. mBio, 10(2), e02273-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02273-18
6.Thanbichler, M., & Shapiro, L. (2003). MipZ, a spatial regulator coordinating chromosome segregation with cell division in Caulobacter. Journal of Bacteriology, 185(4), 1432-1442. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.185.4.1432-1442.2003
7. Hershey, D.M., Fiebig, A. and Crosson, S. (2019) ‘A genome-wide analysis of adhesion in Caulobacter crescentus identifies new regulatory and biosynthetic components for holdfast assembly’, mBio, 10(1). doi:10.1128/mbio.02273-18.
8. Chepkwony, N.K., Hardy, G.G. and Brun, Y.V. (2022) ‘HFAE is a component of the holdfast anchor complex that tethers the holdfast adhesin to the cell envelope’, Journal of Bacteriology, 204(11). doi:10.1128/jb.00273-22.

9. Chepkwony, N.K., Berne, C. and Brun, Y.V. (2019) ‘Comparative analysis of ionic strength tolerance between freshwater and marine Caulobacterales adhesins’, Journal of Bacteriology, 201(18). doi:10.1128/jb.00061-19.