Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5236008"
Line 41: Line 41:
  
 
<center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/part-images/s121e-hplc.png" width = "50%"><br></html></center>
 
<center><html><img src ="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5236/part-images/s121e-hplc.png" width = "50%"><br></html></center>
−
<center>Fig.7 S121ER224QN233K HPLC result </center>
+
<center>Fig.7 The HPLC results after 14 days of incubation of IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K and PET. The results showed that the concentration of TPA, a degradation product of PET, was elevated in the cultures compared to the control group, implying that the degradation of PET </center>
  
 
<!-- -->
 
<!-- -->

Revision as of 11:32, 1 October 2024

IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K

This basic part encodes mutated IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K, which comes from Lu.et al. 2022 but is constructed by us in Escherichia coli. IsPETase is an enzyme found in Iodeonella sakaiensis that possesses the ability to degrade PET[1].



Fig.1 The IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K protein structure predicted using Alphafold and ligand binding predicted using Autodock, mutation sites are marked in red in the images.

Usage and Biology

To insert our parts into plasmids, we’ve designed primers and performed PCRs. Then, our genes were recombined into plasmids and transformed into chassis. To test if our part codes for the mutated IsPETase S121ER224QN233K we want and whether the enzyme works, we've completed two large experimental processes. The first step is plasmid construction. And the second is to test the enzymatic activity.

By conducting colony PCR, we are able to test if our parts have been transformed into chassis successfully. The following result of electrophoresis proves that we’ve inserted genes into chassis since the sequence containing our mutated genes has a total of 891 base pairs and the results are in the right location.


Fig.2 The DNA gel electrophoresis result.

Fig.3 The result of IsPETase-S121ER224QN233K DNA sequencing, the results showed that N205G and signaling peptide pelB sequences have been correctly assembled.

After proving that our genes existed in chassis, we need to test if the bacteria can survive as usual with our genes. Thus, we’ve coated the bacteria on nutritional petri dish. And after a night, E. coli grew over the plate our plate, justifying that E. coli can survive with the gene of our part.


Fig.4 The result of plate coating. The results show that the chassis carrying our IsPETase mutation could survive.


We tested whether the bacteria could translate for our protein, and we examined whether our mutated enzyme is more efficient. For this section, we analyzed two results as well. First, the dynamic curve of our enzyme shows its high efficiency in degrading rate. Second, the electrophoresis result of our protein proves that our enzyme can be successfully coded by the parts we designed.


Fig.4 The enzymatic activity of mutated IsPETase was measured using p-nitrophenyl butyrate. The results showed that the IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K have approximately 2.5-fold higher activity than WT group

Fig.5 Protein electrophoresis result.The Cell Culture group demonstrated the expression of the proteins, while we also tested the medium where cells were centrifuged and discarded. proofing the presence of IsPETase extracellular。


After proving that our enzyme are more effiicient, we moved on to test the ultimate and the most essential part of our part examination, which is to test if our mutated enzyme can actually degrade plastics. For this large step of process, we also designed two approaches.

First, the scanning electron microscope allows us to see the changes of plastic pieces with our bare eyes. However, pure observations are not enough to prove the effectiveness of our enzymes. Thus, we conducted another experiment. Though HPLC, we are able to see the enzyme and waste product curves after plastic degradation via our enzyme.


Fig.6 S121ER224QN233K Electron Scanning Microscope result

Fig.7 The HPLC results after 14 days of incubation of IsPETase-S121E/R224Q/N233K and PET. The results showed that the concentration of TPA, a degradation product of PET, was elevated in the cultures compared to the control group, implying that the degradation of PET

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]



Reference

Lu, Hongyuan, et al. “Machine Learning-Aided Engineering of Hydrolases for Pet Depolymerization.” Nature News, Nature Publishing Group, 27 Apr. 2022, www.nature.com/articles/s41586-022-04599-z.