Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5237017"
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
−
<partinfo>BBa_K5237016</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K5237017</partinfo>
 
<html>
 
<html>
 
<style>
 
<style>
Line 35: Line 35:
 
   <!-- Part summary -->
 
   <!-- Part summary -->
 
   <section id="1">
 
   <section id="1">
−
     <h1>FRET-Donor: mNeonGreen-Oct1</h1>
+
     <h1>FRET-Acceptor: TetR-mScarlet-I</h1>
−
     <p>This composite part is a fusion protein of Oct1-DBD and mNeonGreen. It was used as a FRET donor in combination
+
     <p>This composite part is a fusion protein of TetR and the red fluorescent protein mScarlet-I. It was used as a FRET
−
       with tetR-mScarlet-I as an acceptor.
+
       acceptor in combination with mNeonGreen-Oct1 as the donor.
−
       This part was used to measure the proximity of two DNA strands by FRET fluoresence measurements.
+
       This part was used to measure the proximity of two DNA strands by FRET fluorescence measurements.
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
     <p>&nbsp;</p>
 
     <p>&nbsp;</p>
Line 54: Line 54:
 
         <ul>
 
         <ul>
 
           <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-2.1"><a href="#2.1"><span class="tocnumber">2.1</span> <span
 
           <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-2.1"><a href="#2.1"><span class="tocnumber">2.1</span> <span
−
                 class="toctext">Oct1-DBD</span></a>
+
                 class="toctext">TetR DNA binding protein</span></a>
 
           </li>
 
           </li>
 
           <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-2.2"><a href="#2.2"><span class="tocnumber">2.2</span> <span
 
           <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-2.2"><a href="#2.2"><span class="tocnumber">2.2</span> <span
−
                 class="toctext">mNeonGreen</span></a>
+
                 class="toctext">mScarlet-I</span></a>
 
           </li>
 
           </li>
 
           <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-2.3"><a href="#2.3"><span class="tocnumber">2.3</span> <span
 
           <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-2.3"><a href="#2.3"><span class="tocnumber">2.3</span> <span
Line 302: Line 302:
 
<!--################################-->
 
<!--################################-->
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
 
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span>
−
<partinfo>BBa_K5237016 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
+
<partinfo>BBa_K5237017 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo>
 
<!--################################-->
 
<!--################################-->
  
Line 311: Line 311:
 
   <h1>2. Usage and Biology</h1>
 
   <h1>2. Usage and Biology</h1>
 
   <section id="2.1">
 
   <section id="2.1">
−
     <h1>2.1 Oct1-DBD</h1>
+
     <h1>2.1 TetR DNA binding protein</h1>
−
     <p>Oct1-DBD is the DNA-binding domain of the human transcription factor Oct1 (POU2F1), which plays a key role in
+
     <p>
−
      gene regulation, immune response, and stress adaptation in eukaryotic cells. This domain specifically binds to the
+
      The tetracycline repressor protein (tetR) is naturally present in gram-negative bacteria and is involved in the
−
       octamer motif (5'-ATGCAAAT-3') within promoter and enhancer regions, influencing transcriptional activity
+
       resistance mechanism against tetracycline (and derivatives). It does so by tightly controlling the gene expression
−
       (Lundbäck <i>et al.</i>, 2000). The Oct1-DBD consists of both a POU-specific domain and a POU homeodomain, which
+
      of <i>tetA</i>, which encodes an efflux pump responsible for removing tetracycline from the cell.
−
       work
+
       TetR binds selectively to two plaindromic recognition sequences (<i>tetO</i>>1,2) with high affinity. For DNA
−
       together to form a stable complex with DNA (Park <i>et al.</i>, 2013, Stepchenko <i>et al.</i> 2021).
+
      binding to occur tetR adopts a homodimeric structure and binds with two &#945;-helix-turn- &#945;-helix motifs
−
    </p>
+
       (HTH) to two tandemly oriented tetO sequences. In the presence of tetracycline or its analogs, tetR undergoes a
−
    <p>In synthetic biology, Oct1-DBD was previously used for plasmid display technology due to its strong binding
+
       conformational change, which prevents it from binding to DNA, therby allowing gene expression(Orth <i>et al.</i>
−
       affinity (K<sub>D</sub> = 9 &#215; 10<sup>-11</sup> M). Proteins fused with Oct1-DBD showed increased expression
+
      2000; Kisker <i>et al.</i> 1995).
−
       and protein solubility
+
      <br>
−
       (Parker <i>et al.</i> 2020).
+
      Due to its robust and highly regulatable DNA-binding properties, tetR has become a widely adopted tool in
 +
       synthetic
 +
       biology. Its ease of modification and ability to function in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems have made it
 +
       an essential element in the development of gene regulation systems (Berens & Hillen, 2004).
 +
      <br>
 +
      In our project, tetR was integrated into the design of a modular DNA-stapling system because of its
 +
      well-characterized behavior, ensuring reliable DNA interactions.
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
   </section>
 
   </section>
−
   <section id?="2.2">
+
   <section id="2.2">
−
     <h1>2.2 mNeonGreen</h1>
+
     <h1>2.2mScarlet-I</h1>
 +
    <p>
 +
      mScarlet-I is a rapidly-maturing monomeric red fluorescent protein designed by Bindels <i>et al.</i> in 2017. It
 +
      is a derivative of the original mScarlet, with a single amino acid substitution (T74I) that enhances its
 +
      maturation
 +
      speed and fluorescence properties (Bindels <i>et al.</i>, 201). mScarlet-I absorbs at 569 nm and emits at 594 nm.
 +
    </p>
 +
    <p>
 
     <p>
 
     <p>
−
       mNeonGreen is a bright, monomeric fluorescent protein from <i>Branchiostoma lanceolatum</i> discovered by Shaner
+
       mScarlet-I stands out among red fluorescent proteins for its high quantum yield (0.54), long fluorescence lifetime
−
       <i>et al.</i> (2013). It exhibits fast maturation, high photostability, and a high quantum yield. With an
+
       (3.1 ns), and rapid maturation time of approximately 36 minutes. These features ensure strong fluorescence
−
       excitation peak
+
       intensity and make it an ideal candidate for Förster Resonance Energy Transfer assays (McCullock <i>et al.</i>
−
      at 506 nm and an emission maximum at 517 nm, mNeonGreen is ideal for bioimaging applications (Shaner <i>et
+
       2020). When paired with mNeonGreen, mScarlet-I
−
        al.</i>,
+
−
       2013). Its high quantum yield and stability make it an optimal electron donor for Förster Resonance Energy
+
−
      Transfer (FRET). When paired with mScarlet-I, it generates three times the intensity compared to mCherry.
+
 
     </p>
 
     </p>
 
   </section>
 
   </section>
Line 341: Line 351:
 
     <p>Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) is a distance-dependent physical process where energy is transferred
 
     <p>Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) is a distance-dependent physical process where energy is transferred
 
       non-radiatively from an excited donor fluorophore to an acceptor fluorophore via dipole-dipole coupling. The
 
       non-radiatively from an excited donor fluorophore to an acceptor fluorophore via dipole-dipole coupling. The
−
       efficiency of energy transfer is highly sensitive to the distance between the donor and acceptor, typically in the
+
       efficiency of energy transfer is highly sensitive to the distance between the donor and acceptor, typically in
 +
      the
 
       range of 1-10 nm, making FRET ideal for studying molecular proximity (Hochreiter <i>et al.</i>, 2019). This
 
       range of 1-10 nm, making FRET ideal for studying molecular proximity (Hochreiter <i>et al.</i>, 2019). This
 
       proximity
 
       proximity
 
       sensitivity is governed by the Förster radius (R₀), which is the distance at which 50% energy transfer occurs.
 
       sensitivity is governed by the Förster radius (R₀), which is the distance at which 50% energy transfer occurs.
 
       Factors affecting FRET efficiency include the overlap of the donor's emission spectrum with the acceptor's
 
       Factors affecting FRET efficiency include the overlap of the donor's emission spectrum with the acceptor's
−
       absorption spectrum, the quantum yield of the donor, and the relative orientation of the fluorophores (Wu & Brand,
+
       absorption spectrum, the quantum yield of the donor, and the relative orientation of the fluorophores (Wu &
 +
      Brand,
 
       1994). These characteristics allow FRET to detect interactions such as protein-DNA binding or DNA proximity in
 
       1994). These characteristics allow FRET to detect interactions such as protein-DNA binding or DNA proximity in
 
       real time.
 
       real time.
Line 364: Line 376:
 
         </div>
 
         </div>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
−
      </div>
+
    </div>
 
   </section>
 
   </section>
 
</section>
 
</section>
−
  <section id="3">
+
<section id="3">
−
    <h1>3. Assembly and part evolution</h1>
+
  <h1>3. Assembly and part evolution</h1>
−
    <p>The amino acid sequence of mNeonGreen was taken from the fluorescent protein database (<a
+
  <p>
−
        href="https://www.fpbase.org/">FPbase</a>) and codon optimized for use in <i>E. coli</i>.
+
    As part of our engineering efforts an engineered tetR-mScarlet was tested, that binds DNA as a monomer. This scTetR is a fusion of
−
      It was fused to thhe N-terminus of Oct1-DBD (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237004">BBa_K52347004</a>)
+
    two tetR proteins with a flexible linker which was described to maintain the same DNA-binding affinity and specificity as wild-type tetR (Kaminoka <i>et al</i>. 2006; Krueger <i>et al.</i>2003)</p>
−
       for protein purification of Oct1-DBD and <i>in vivo</i> FRET measurements.
+
  <p>
−
     </p>
+
    Our experiments with the scTetR-mScarlet-I fusion protein showed no significant expression. Since the scTetR-mScarlet-I fusion protein was expressed as part of a polycistronic transcript, the results should be taken with caution.
−
   </section>
+
    Nonetheless we belive that qualitative assesements can still be drawn, because the same construct with tetR-mScarlet-I showed a good expression (Figure 2, 3).
−
   <section id="4">
+
  </p>
−
    <h1>4. Results</h1>
+
  <div class="thumb"></div>
−
    <p>
+
  <div class="thumbinner" style="width:550px"><img alt="pic"
−
      The FRET assay was developed using a two-plasmid system in bacterial cells. The expression plasmid
+
      src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5237/engineering/sist-mut-t7-mscarlet-i.svg"
−
      contains a tetR binding site (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237019" target="_blank">BBa_K5237019</a>) and expresses three key proteins under the control of a single T7
+
      style="width:99%;" class="thumbimage">
−
      promoter in a polycistronic operon: (1) tetR-Oct1, our simple staple fusion protein that acts as a
+
    <div class="thumbcaption">
−
      bivalent DNA-binding protein, tethering two plasmids via tetR and Oct1 binding sites; (2)
+
       <i><b>Figure 2: Fluoresence measurement of scTetR with mutant T7 polymerase.</b> Fluorescence intensity of mScarlet-I (ex. 560 nm, em. 600 nm) was measured 18 h after induction with IPTG and normalized to cell count (OD<sub>600</sub>).  
−
      Oct1-mNeonGreen, serving as the FRET donor; and (3) tetR-mScarlet-I, the FRET acceptor. This
+
      Positive control consists of a tetR-mNeonGreen fusion protein.</i>
−
      ensures all three proteins are co-expressed in similar stoichiometry. The folding plasmid contains
+
     </div>
−
      an Oct1 binding site (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237018">BBa_K5237018</a>) for the staple and FRET donor binding.
+
   </div>
−
      <br><br>
+
   </div>
−
      When tetR-Oct1 binds its respective sites on both plasmids, it brings mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I
+
</section>
−
      into close proximity, facilitating FRET between the two fluorophores. Successful stapling of the
+
<section id="4">
−
      plasmids results in increased energy transfer from mNeonGreen to mScarlet-I, which can be detected
+
  <h1>4. Results</h1>
−
      by exciting mNeonGreen and measuring enhanced emission from mScarlet-I. A positive control,
+
  <p>
−
      consisting of a direct fusion of mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I, ensures maximal FRET efficiency and
+
    The FRET assay was developed using a two-plasmid system in bacterial cells. The expression plasmid
−
      serves as a benchmark for the assay.
+
    contains a tetR binding site (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237019" target="_blank">BBa_K5237019</a>)
−
      <br><br>
+
    and expresses three key proteins under the control of a single T7
−
      Fluorescence intensity, normalized to cell count, of mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I was measured 18 h
+
    promoter in a polycistronic operon: (1) tetR-Oct1, our simple staple fusion protein that acts as a
−
      after induction with varying IPTG concentration (Figure 3). An increasing
+
    bivalent DNA-binding protein, tethering two plasmids via tetR and Oct1 binding sites; (2)
−
      expression strength
+
    Oct1-mNeonGreen, serving as the FRET donor; and (3) tetR-mScarlet-I, the FRET acceptor. This
−
      is visible for decreasing IPTG concentrations. Fluorescence intensity of the positive control was
+
    ensures all three proteins are co-expressed in similar stoichiometry. The folding plasmid contains
−
      significantly stronger compared to the negative control and staple. The negative control and
+
    an Oct1 binding site (<a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237018">BBa_K5237018</a>) for the staple and FRET
−
      staple, which both have the same expression plasmid construct, had similar fluorescence intensity
+
    donor binding.
−
      for mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I down to approximately 0.05 mM. Lower concentrations resulted in
+
    <br><br>
−
      strong discrepancies. To ensure comparability between the negative control and staple, further
+
    When tetR-Oct1 binds its respective sites on both plasmids, it brings mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I
−
      fluorescence intensity measurements were conducted after induction with 0.05 mM IPTG. Fluorescence
+
    into close proximity, facilitating FRET between the two fluorophores. Successful stapling of the
−
      measurement of the donor and acceptor showed similar intensities, with only a small significant
+
    plasmids results in increased energy transfer from mNeonGreen to mScarlet-I, which can be detected
−
      difference for mNeonGreen. A large difference could be measured between the staple and negative
+
    by exciting mNeonGreen and measuring enhanced emission from mScarlet-I. A positive control,
−
      control, indicating proximity induced FRET. (Figure 3)
+
    consisting of a direct fusion of mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I, ensures maximal FRET efficiency and
−
    </p>
+
    serves as a benchmark for the assay.
−
    <div class="thumb">
+
    <br><br>
−
      <div class="thumbinner" style="width:700px"><img alt="pic"
+
    Fluorescence intensity, normalized to cell count, of mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I was measured 18 h
−
          src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5237/wetlab-results/sist-results-panel-fret.svg" style="width:99%;"
+
    after induction with varying IPTG concentration (Figure 3). An increasing
−
          class="thumbimage">
+
    expression strength
−
        <div class="thumbcaption">
+
    is visible for decreasing IPTG concentrations. Fluorescence intensity of the positive control was
−
          <i><b>Figure 3: Fluorescence of mNeonGreen, mScarlet-I and FRET.</b>
+
    significantly stronger compared to the negative control and staple. The negative control and
−
              Fluorescence intensity of mNeonGreen (ex. 490 nm, em. 530 nm),
+
    staple, which both have the same expression plasmid construct, had similar fluorescence intensity
−
              mScarlet-I (ex. 560 nm, em. 600 nm), and FRET (ex. 490 nm, em. 600 nm) was measured 18 h after induction with IPTG and normalized to cell count (OD<sub>600</sub>).
+
    for mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I down to approximately 0.05 mM. Lower concentrations resulted in
−
              <b>A&#41;, B&#41;</b> Fluorescence intensity of mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I after induction with different IPTG concentrations.
+
    strong discrepancies. To ensure comparability between the negative control and staple, further
−
              <b>C&#41;</b> Fluorescence intensity of FRET pair induced with 0.025 mM IPTG. Statistical significance was
+
    fluorescence intensity measurements were conducted after induction with 0.05 mM IPTG. Fluorescence
−
              tested for with Ordinary two-way ANOVA with Šidák's multiple comparison test, with a single
+
    measurement of the donor and acceptor showed similar intensities, with only a small significant
−
              pooled variance. *p &lt; 0.05, ****p &lt; 0.001. Only significant results, within groups are shown. Data is depcited as mean &#177; SD.
+
    difference for mNeonGreen. A large difference could be measured between the staple and negative
−
            </i>
+
    control, indicating proximity induced FRET. (Figure 3)
−
        </div>
+
  </p>
 +
  <div class="thumb">
 +
    <div class="thumbinner" style="width:700px"><img alt="pic"
 +
        src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5237/wetlab-results/sist-results-panel-fret.svg" style="width:99%;"
 +
        class="thumbimage">
 +
      <div class="thumbcaption">
 +
        <i><b>Figure 3: Fluorescence of mNeonGreen, mScarlet-I and FRET.</b>
 +
          Fluorescence intensity of mNeonGreen (ex. 490 nm, em. 530 nm),
 +
          mScarlet-I (ex. 560 nm, em. 600 nm), and FRET (ex. 490 nm, em. 600 nm) was measured 18 h after induction with
 +
          IPTG and normalized to cell count (OD<sub>600</sub>).
 +
          <b>A&#41;, B&#41;</b> Fluorescence intensity of mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I after induction with different IPTG
 +
          concentrations.
 +
          <b>C&#41;</b> Fluorescence intensity of FRET pair induced with 0.025 mM IPTG. Statistical significance was
 +
          tested for with Ordinary two-way ANOVA with Šidák's multiple comparison test, with a single
 +
          pooled variance. *p &lt; 0.05, ****p &lt; 0.001. Only significant results, within groups are shown. Data is
 +
          depcited as mean &#177; SD.
 +
        </i>
 
       </div>
 
       </div>
 
     </div>
 
     </div>
 +
  </div>
 +
</section>
 +
Here is the bibliography formatted in APA 7th edition compatible with HTML:
  
 +
```html
 +
<section id="5">
 +
  <h1>5. References</h1>
 +
  <p>Berens, C., & Hillen, W. (2004). Gene Regulation By Tetracyclines. In J. K. Setlow (Ed.), <em>Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods</em> (pp. 255–277). Springer US. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48573-2_13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48573-2_13</a></p>
  
−
   </section>
+
   <p>Bindels, D. S., Haarbosch, L., van Weeren, L., Postma, M., Wiese, K. E., Mastop, M., Aumonier, S., Gotthard, G., Royant, A., Hink, M. A., & Gadella, T. W. J. (2017). mScarlet: A bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. <em>Nature Methods, 14</em>(1), 53–56. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4074" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4074</a></p>
−
   <section id="5">
+
 
−
    <h1>5. References</h1>
+
   <p>Hochreiter, B., Kunze, M., Moser, B., & Schmid, J. A. (2019). Advanced FRET normalization allows quantitative analysis of protein interactions including stoichiometries and relative affinities in living cells. <em>Scientific Reports, 9</em>(1), 8233. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44650-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44650-0</a></p>
 +
 
 +
  <p>Kisker, C., Hinrichs, W., Tovar, K., Hillen, W., & Saenger, W. (1995). The Complex Formed Between Tet Repressor and Tetracycline-Mg<sup>2+</sup> Reveals Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance. <em>Journal of Molecular Biology, 247</em>(2), 260–280. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1994.0138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1994.0138</a></p>
 +
 
 +
  <p>McCullock, T. W., MacLean, D. M., & Kammermeier, P. J. (2020). Comparing the performance of mScarlet-I, mRuby3, and mCherry as FRET acceptors for mNeonGreen. <em>PLOS ONE, 15</em>(2), e0219886. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219886" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219886</a></p>
 +
 
 +
  <p>Okamoto, K., & Sako, Y. (2017). Recent advances in FRET for the study of protein interactions and dynamics. <em>Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 46</em>, 16–23. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2017.03.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2017.03.010</a></p>
 +
 
 +
  <p>Orth, P., Schnappinger, D., Hillen, W., Saenger, W., & Hinrichs, W. (2000). Structural basis of gene regulation by the tetracycline inducible Tet repressor-operator system. <em>Nature Structural Biology, 7</em>(3), 215–219. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/73324" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/73324</a></p>
 +
 
 +
  <p>Shaner, N. C., Lambert, G. G., Chammas, A., Ni, Y., Cranfill, P. J., Baird, M. A., Sell, B. R., Allen, J. R., Day, R. N., Israelsson, M., Davidson, M. W., & Wang, J. (2013). A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from <em>Branchiostoma lanceolatum</em>. <em>Nature Methods, 10</em>(5), 407–409. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2413" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2413</a></p>
 +
 
 +
  <p>Wu, P. G., & Brand, L. (1994). Resonance Energy Transfer: Methods and Applications. <em>Analytical Biochemistry, 218</em>(1), 1-13. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1994.1134" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1994.1134</a></p>
 +
 
 +
</section>
 +
```
 +
</body>
 +
</html>

Revision as of 13:19, 29 September 2024

BBa_K5237017

FRET-Acceptor: TetR-mScarlet-I

This composite part is a fusion protein of TetR and the red fluorescent protein mScarlet-I. It was used as a FRET acceptor in combination with mNeonGreen-Oct1 as the donor. This part was used to measure the proximity of two DNA strands by FRET fluorescence measurements.

 

The PICasSO Toolbox


Figure 1: Example how the part collection can be used to engineer new staples


The 3D organization of the genome plays a crucial role in regulating gene expression in eukaryotic cells, impacting cellular behavior, evolution, and disease. Beyond the linear DNA sequence, the spatial arrangement of chromatin, influenced by DNA-DNA interactions, shapes pathways of gene regulation. However, the tools to precisely manipulate this genomic architecture remain limited, rendering it challenging to explore the full potential of the 3D genome in synthetic biology. We - iGEM Team Heidelberg 2024 - have developed PICasSO, a powerful molecular toolbox based on various DNA-binding proteins to address this issue.

The PICasSO part collection offers a comprehensive, modular platform for precise manipulation and re-programming of DNA-DNA interactions using protein staples in living cells, enabling researchers to recreate natural 3D genomic interactions, such as enhancer hijacking, or to design entirely new spatial architectures for gene regulation. Beyond its versatility, PICasSO includes robust assay systems to support the engineering, optimization, and testing of new staples, ensuring functionality in vitro and in vivo. We took special care to include parts crucial for testing every step of the cycle (design, build, test, learn) when engineering new parts

At its heart, the PICasSO part collection consists of three categories. (i) Our DNA-binding proteins include our finalized enhancer hijacking Cas staple as well as half staples that can be used by scientists to compose entirely new Cas staples in the future. We also include our simple staples that serve as controls for successful stapling and can be further engineered to create alternative, simpler and more compact staples. (ii) As functional elements, we list additional parts that enhance the functionality of our Cas and Basic staples. These consist of protease-cleavable peptide linkers and inteins that allow condition-specific, dynamic stapling in vivo. Besides staple functionality, we also include the parts to enable the efficient delivery of PICasSO's with our interkingdom conjugation system.

(iii) As the final component of our collection, we provide parts that support the use of our custom readout systems. These include components of our established FRET-based proximity assay system, enabling users to confirm accurate stapling. Additionally, we offer a complementary, application-oriented testing system for functional readout via a luciferase reporter, which allows for straightforward experimental simulation of enhancer hijacking.

The following table gives a complete overview of all parts in our PICasSO toolbox. The highlighted parts showed exceptional performance as described on our iGEM wiki and can serve as a reference. The other parts in the collection are versatile building blocks designed to provide future iGEMers with the flexibility to engineer their own custom Cas staples, enabling further optimization and innovation

Our part collection includes:

DNA-binding proteins: The building blocks for engineering of custom staples for DNA-DNA interactions with a modular system ensuring easy assembly.
BBa_K5237000 fgRNA Entryvector MbCas12a-SpCas9 Entryvector for simple fgRNA cloning via SapI
BBa_K5237001 Staple subunit: dMbCas12a-Nucleoplasmin NLS Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with fgRNA and dCas9
BBa_K5237002 Staple subunit: SV40 NLS-dSpCas9-SV40 NLS Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with our fgRNA or dCas12a
BBa_K5237003 Cas-Staple: SV40 NLS-dMbCas12a-dSpCas9-Nucleoplasmin NLS Functional Cas staple that can be combined with sgRNA or fgRNA to bring two DNA strands in close proximity
BBa_K5237004 Staple subunit: Oct1-DBD Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with TetR.
Can also be combined with a fluorescent protein as part of the FRET proximity assay
BBa_K5237005 Staple subunit: TetR Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with Oct1.
Can also be combined with a fluorescent protein as part of the FRET proximity assay
BBa_K5237006 Simple taple: TetR-Oct1 Functional staple that can be used to bring two DNA strands in close proximity
BBa_K5237007 Staple subunit: GCN4 Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with rGCN4
BBa_K5237008 Staple subunit: rGCN4 Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with rGCN4
BBa_K5237009 Mini staple: bGCN4 Assembled staple with minimal size that can be further engineered
Functional elements: Protease cleavable peptide linkers and inteins are used to control and modify staples for further optimization for custom applications.
BBa_K5237010 Cathepsin B-Cleavable Linker (GFLG) Cathepsin B cleavable peptide linker, that can be used to combine two staple subunits ,to make responsive staples
BBa_K5237011 Cathepsin B Expression Cassette Cathepsin B which can be selectively express to cut the cleavable linker
BBa_K5237012 Caged NpuN Intein Undergoes protein transsplicing after protease activation, can be used to create functionalized staple units
BBa_K5237013 Caged NpuC Intein Undergoes protein transsplicing after protease activation, can be used to create functionalized staple units
BBa_K5237014 fgRNA processing casette Processing casette to produce multiple fgRNAs from one transcript, can be used for multiplexing
BBa_K5237015 Intimin anti-EGFR Nanobody Interkindom conjugation between bacteria and mammalian cells, as alternative delivery tool for large constructs
Readout Systems: FRET and enhancer recruitment to measure proximity of stapled DNA in bacterial and mammalian living cells enabling swift testing and easy development for new systems.
BBa_K5237016 FRET-Donor: mNeonGreen-Oct1 Donor part for the FRET assay binding the Oct1 binding cassette. Can be used to visualize DNA-DNA proximity
BBa_K5237017 FRET-Acceptor: TetR-mScarlet-I Acceptor part for the FRET assay binding the TetR binding cassette. Can be used to visualize DNA-DNA proximity
BBa_K5237018 Oct1 Binding Casette DNA sequence containing 12 Oct1 binding motifs, can be used for different assays such as the FRET proximity assay
BBa_K5237019 TetR Binding Cassette DNA sequence containing 12 Oct1 binding motifs, can be used for different assays such as the FRET proximity assay
BBa_K5237020 Cathepsin B-Cleavable Trans-Activator: NLS-Gal4-GFLG-VP64 Readout system that responds to protease activity. It was used to test Cathepsin-B cleavable linker.
BBa_K5237021 NLS-Gal4-VP64 Trans-activating enhancer, that can be used to simulate enhancer hijacking.
BBa_K5237022 mCherry Expression Cassette: UAS, minimal Promotor, mCherry Readout system for enhancer binding. It was used to test Cathepsin-B cleavable linker.
BBa_K5237023 Oct1 - 5x UAS binding casette Oct1 and UAS binding cassette, that was used for the simulated enhancer hijacking assay.
BBa_K5237024 TRE-minimal promoter- firefly luciferase Contains Firefly luciferase controlled by a minimal promoter. It was used as a luminescence readout for simulated enhancer hijacking.

1. Sequence overview

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NotI site found at 1149
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BamHI site found at 623
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal SapI.rc site found at 466

2. Usage and Biology

2.1 TetR DNA binding protein

The tetracycline repressor protein (tetR) is naturally present in gram-negative bacteria and is involved in the resistance mechanism against tetracycline (and derivatives). It does so by tightly controlling the gene expression of tetA, which encodes an efflux pump responsible for removing tetracycline from the cell. TetR binds selectively to two plaindromic recognition sequences (tetO>1,2) with high affinity. For DNA binding to occur tetR adopts a homodimeric structure and binds with two α-helix-turn- α-helix motifs (HTH) to two tandemly oriented tetO sequences. In the presence of tetracycline or its analogs, tetR undergoes a conformational change, which prevents it from binding to DNA, therby allowing gene expression(Orth et al. 2000; Kisker et al. 1995).
Due to its robust and highly regulatable DNA-binding properties, tetR has become a widely adopted tool in synthetic biology. Its ease of modification and ability to function in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems have made it an essential element in the development of gene regulation systems (Berens & Hillen, 2004).
In our project, tetR was integrated into the design of a modular DNA-stapling system because of its well-characterized behavior, ensuring reliable DNA interactions.

2.2mScarlet-I

mScarlet-I is a rapidly-maturing monomeric red fluorescent protein designed by Bindels et al. in 2017. It is a derivative of the original mScarlet, with a single amino acid substitution (T74I) that enhances its maturation speed and fluorescence properties (Bindels et al., 201). mScarlet-I absorbs at 569 nm and emits at 594 nm.

mScarlet-I stands out among red fluorescent proteins for its high quantum yield (0.54), long fluorescence lifetime (3.1 ns), and rapid maturation time of approximately 36 minutes. These features ensure strong fluorescence intensity and make it an ideal candidate for Förster Resonance Energy Transfer assays (McCullock et al. 2020). When paired with mNeonGreen, mScarlet-I

2.3 Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)

Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) is a distance-dependent physical process where energy is transferred non-radiatively from an excited donor fluorophore to an acceptor fluorophore via dipole-dipole coupling. The efficiency of energy transfer is highly sensitive to the distance between the donor and acceptor, typically in the range of 1-10 nm, making FRET ideal for studying molecular proximity (Hochreiter et al., 2019). This proximity sensitivity is governed by the Förster radius (R₀), which is the distance at which 50% energy transfer occurs. Factors affecting FRET efficiency include the overlap of the donor's emission spectrum with the acceptor's absorption spectrum, the quantum yield of the donor, and the relative orientation of the fluorophores (Wu & Brand, 1994). These characteristics allow FRET to detect interactions such as protein-DNA binding or DNA proximity in real time. For our assay, we selected mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I as donor and acceptor, respectively, due to their strong fluorescence, spectral overlap, and minimal photobleaching, ensuring high FRET efficiency in our system (Bindels et al., 2017; Shaner et al., 2013). FRET's sensitivity to small changes in distance makes it especially powerful for analyzing molecular interactions in living cells (Okamoto & Sako, 2017).

Figure 2: Overview of excitation and emission spectrum of mNeonGreen and m-Scarlet and it's properties as a FRET pair

3. Assembly and part evolution

As part of our engineering efforts an engineered tetR-mScarlet was tested, that binds DNA as a monomer. This scTetR is a fusion of two tetR proteins with a flexible linker which was described to maintain the same DNA-binding affinity and specificity as wild-type tetR (Kaminoka et al. 2006; Krueger et al.2003)

Our experiments with the scTetR-mScarlet-I fusion protein showed no significant expression. Since the scTetR-mScarlet-I fusion protein was expressed as part of a polycistronic transcript, the results should be taken with caution. Nonetheless we belive that qualitative assesements can still be drawn, because the same construct with tetR-mScarlet-I showed a good expression (Figure 2, 3).

pic
Figure 2: Fluoresence measurement of scTetR with mutant T7 polymerase. Fluorescence intensity of mScarlet-I (ex. 560 nm, em. 600 nm) was measured 18 h after induction with IPTG and normalized to cell count (OD600). Positive control consists of a tetR-mNeonGreen fusion protein.

4. Results

The FRET assay was developed using a two-plasmid system in bacterial cells. The expression plasmid contains a tetR binding site (BBa_K5237019) and expresses three key proteins under the control of a single T7 promoter in a polycistronic operon: (1) tetR-Oct1, our simple staple fusion protein that acts as a bivalent DNA-binding protein, tethering two plasmids via tetR and Oct1 binding sites; (2) Oct1-mNeonGreen, serving as the FRET donor; and (3) tetR-mScarlet-I, the FRET acceptor. This ensures all three proteins are co-expressed in similar stoichiometry. The folding plasmid contains an Oct1 binding site (BBa_K5237018) for the staple and FRET donor binding.

When tetR-Oct1 binds its respective sites on both plasmids, it brings mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I into close proximity, facilitating FRET between the two fluorophores. Successful stapling of the plasmids results in increased energy transfer from mNeonGreen to mScarlet-I, which can be detected by exciting mNeonGreen and measuring enhanced emission from mScarlet-I. A positive control, consisting of a direct fusion of mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I, ensures maximal FRET efficiency and serves as a benchmark for the assay.

Fluorescence intensity, normalized to cell count, of mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I was measured 18 h after induction with varying IPTG concentration (Figure 3). An increasing expression strength is visible for decreasing IPTG concentrations. Fluorescence intensity of the positive control was significantly stronger compared to the negative control and staple. The negative control and staple, which both have the same expression plasmid construct, had similar fluorescence intensity for mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I down to approximately 0.05 mM. Lower concentrations resulted in strong discrepancies. To ensure comparability between the negative control and staple, further fluorescence intensity measurements were conducted after induction with 0.05 mM IPTG. Fluorescence measurement of the donor and acceptor showed similar intensities, with only a small significant difference for mNeonGreen. A large difference could be measured between the staple and negative control, indicating proximity induced FRET. (Figure 3)

pic
Figure 3: Fluorescence of mNeonGreen, mScarlet-I and FRET. Fluorescence intensity of mNeonGreen (ex. 490 nm, em. 530 nm), mScarlet-I (ex. 560 nm, em. 600 nm), and FRET (ex. 490 nm, em. 600 nm) was measured 18 h after induction with IPTG and normalized to cell count (OD600). A), B) Fluorescence intensity of mNeonGreen and mScarlet-I after induction with different IPTG concentrations. C) Fluorescence intensity of FRET pair induced with 0.025 mM IPTG. Statistical significance was tested for with Ordinary two-way ANOVA with Šidák's multiple comparison test, with a single pooled variance. *p < 0.05, ****p < 0.001. Only significant results, within groups are shown. Data is depcited as mean ± SD.
Here is the bibliography formatted in APA 7th edition compatible with HTML: ```html

5. References

Berens, C., & Hillen, W. (2004). Gene Regulation By Tetracyclines. In J. K. Setlow (Ed.), Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods (pp. 255–277). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48573-2_13

Bindels, D. S., Haarbosch, L., van Weeren, L., Postma, M., Wiese, K. E., Mastop, M., Aumonier, S., Gotthard, G., Royant, A., Hink, M. A., & Gadella, T. W. J. (2017). mScarlet: A bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nature Methods, 14(1), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4074

Hochreiter, B., Kunze, M., Moser, B., & Schmid, J. A. (2019). Advanced FRET normalization allows quantitative analysis of protein interactions including stoichiometries and relative affinities in living cells. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 8233. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44650-0

Kisker, C., Hinrichs, W., Tovar, K., Hillen, W., & Saenger, W. (1995). The Complex Formed Between Tet Repressor and Tetracycline-Mg2+ Reveals Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance. Journal of Molecular Biology, 247(2), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1994.0138

McCullock, T. W., MacLean, D. M., & Kammermeier, P. J. (2020). Comparing the performance of mScarlet-I, mRuby3, and mCherry as FRET acceptors for mNeonGreen. PLOS ONE, 15(2), e0219886. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219886

Okamoto, K., & Sako, Y. (2017). Recent advances in FRET for the study of protein interactions and dynamics. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 46, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2017.03.010

Orth, P., Schnappinger, D., Hillen, W., Saenger, W., & Hinrichs, W. (2000). Structural basis of gene regulation by the tetracycline inducible Tet repressor-operator system. Nature Structural Biology, 7(3), 215–219. https://doi.org/10.1038/73324

Shaner, N. C., Lambert, G. G., Chammas, A., Ni, Y., Cranfill, P. J., Baird, M. A., Sell, B. R., Allen, J. R., Day, R. N., Israelsson, M., Davidson, M. W., & Wang, J. (2013). A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Nature Methods, 10(5), 407–409. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2413

Wu, P. G., & Brand, L. (1994). Resonance Energy Transfer: Methods and Applications. Analytical Biochemistry, 218(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1994.1134

```