Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5237009"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
− | <partinfo>BBa_K5237009 | + | <partinfo>BBa_K5237009</partinfo> |
+ | <html> | ||
+ | <style> | ||
+ | p { | ||
+ | text-align: justify; | ||
+ | margin-right: 25px; | ||
+ | font-style: normal; | ||
+ | } | ||
− | + | section { | |
+ | margin-left: 25px; | ||
+ | margin-right: 25px; | ||
+ | margin-top: 25px; | ||
+ | } | ||
− | + | .thumb { | |
− | + | width: 100%; | |
+ | } | ||
− | <!-- --> | + | table, |
+ | th, | ||
+ | td { | ||
+ | border: 0.5px solid black; | ||
+ | border-collapse: collapse; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | th, | ||
+ | td { | ||
+ | padding: 1.5px; | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | </style> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <body> | ||
+ | <!-- Part summary --> | ||
+ | <section id="0"> | ||
+ | <h1>Mini staple:</h1> | ||
+ | <p>The Mini staple is a fuion of GCN4 and rGCN4, engineered to bind two DNA strands simultaneously and induce | ||
+ | proximity.</p> | ||
+ | <p> </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | <div id="toc" class="toc"> | ||
+ | <div id="toctitle"> | ||
+ | <h1>Contents</h1> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-1"><a href="#1"><span class="tocnumber">1</span> <span class="toctext">Sequence | ||
+ | overview</span></a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-2"><a href="#2"><span class="tocnumber">2</span> <span class="toctext">Usage and | ||
+ | Biology</span></a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li class="toclevel-1 tocsetction-3"><a href="#3"><span class="tocnumber">3</span> <span class="toctext">Assembly | ||
+ | and part evolution</span></a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-5"><a href="#4"><span class="tocnumber">4</span> <span | ||
+ | class="toctext">Results</span></a> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-6"> | ||
+ | <a href="#4.1"><span class="tocnumber">4.1</span> <span class="toctext">Protein Expression and | ||
+ | Purification</span></a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li class="toclevel-2 tocsection-7"> | ||
+ | <a href="#4.2"><span class="tocnumber">4.2</span> <span class="toctext">Electrophoretic Mobility Shift | ||
+ | Assay</span></a> | ||
+ | <ul> | ||
+ | <li class="toclevel-3 tocsection-8"> | ||
+ | <a href="#4.2"><span class="tocnumber">4.2.1</span> <span class="toctext">Qualitative DNA binding | ||
+ | analysis</span></a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li class="toclevel-3 tocsection-9"> | ||
+ | <a href="#4.2"><span class="tocnumber">4.2.2</span> <span class="toctext">Quantitative DNA binding | ||
+ | analysis</span></a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | <li class="toclevel-1 tocsection-8"><a href="#5"><span class="tocnumber">5</span> <span | ||
+ | class="toctext">References</span></a> | ||
+ | </li> | ||
+ | </ul> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <font size="5"><b>The PICasSO Toolbox </b> </font> | ||
+ | <p><br></p> | ||
+ | <div class="thumb"></div> | ||
+ | <div class="thumbinner" style="width:550px"><img alt="" | ||
+ | src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5237/wetlab-results/registry-part-collection-engineering-cycle-example-overview.svg" | ||
+ | style="width:99%;" class="thumbimage"> | ||
+ | <div class="thumbcaption"> | ||
+ | <i><b>Figure 1: Example how the part collection can be used to engineer new staples</b></i> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | The 3D organization of the genome plays a crucial role in regulating gene expression in eukaryotic cells, | ||
+ | impacting cellular behavior, evolution, and disease. Beyond the linear DNA sequence, the spatial arrangement of | ||
+ | chromatin, influenced by DNA-DNA interactions, shapes pathways of gene regulation. However, the tools to precisely | ||
+ | manipulate this genomic architecture remain limited, rendering it challenging to explore the full potential of the | ||
+ | 3D genome in synthetic biology. We - iGEM Team Heidelberg 2024 - have developed PICasSO, a powerful molecular | ||
+ | toolbox based on various DNA-binding proteins to address this issue. | ||
+ | |||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The <b>PICasSO</b> part collection offers a comprehensive, modular platform for precise manipulation and | ||
+ | re-programming | ||
+ | of DNA-DNA interactions using protein staples in living cells, enabling researchers to recreate natural 3D genomic | ||
+ | interactions, such as enhancer hijacking, or to design entirely new spatial architectures for gene regulation. | ||
+ | Beyond its versatility, PICasSO includes robust assay systems to support the engineering, optimization, and | ||
+ | testing of new staples, ensuring functionality <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i>. We took special care to include | ||
+ | parts crucial for testing every step of the cycle (design, build, test, learn) when engineering new parts | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <p>At its heart, the PICasSO part collection consists of three categories. (i) Our <b>DNA-binding proteins</b> | ||
+ | include our | ||
+ | finalized enhancer hijacking Cas staple as well as half staples that can be used by scientists to compose entirely | ||
+ | new Cas staples in the future. We also include our simple staples that serve as controls for successful stapling | ||
+ | and can be further engineered to create alternative, simpler and more compact staples. (ii) As <b>functional | ||
+ | elements</b>, we list additional parts that enhance the functionality of our Cas and Basic staples. These | ||
+ | consist of | ||
+ | protease-cleavable peptide linkers and inteins that allow condition-specific, dynamic stapling <i>in vivo</i>. | ||
+ | Besides staple functionality, we also include the parts to enable the efficient delivery of PICasSO's with our | ||
+ | interkingdom conjugation system. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | (iii) As the final component of our collection, we provide parts that support the use of our <b>custom readout | ||
+ | systems</b>. These include components of our established FRET-based proximity assay system, enabling users to | ||
+ | confirm | ||
+ | accurate stapling. Additionally, we offer a complementary, application-oriented testing system for functional | ||
+ | readout via a luciferase reporter, which allows for straightforward experimental simulation of enhancer hijacking. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The following table gives a complete overview of all parts in our PICasSO toolbox. The highlighted parts showed | ||
+ | exceptional performance as described on our iGEM wiki and can serve as a reference. The other parts in the | ||
+ | collection are versatile building blocks designed to provide future iGEMers with the flexibility to engineer their | ||
+ | own custom Cas staples, enabling further optimization and innovation | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | <font size="4"><b>Our part collection includes:</b></font><br> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <table style="width: 90%;"> | ||
+ | <td colspan="3" align="left"><b>DNA-binding proteins: </b> | ||
+ | The building blocks for engineering of custom staples for DNA-DNA interactions with a modular system ensuring | ||
+ | easy assembly.</td> | ||
+ | <tbody> | ||
+ | <tr bgcolor="#FFD700"> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237000" target="_blank">BBa_K5237000</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>fgRNA Entryvector MbCas12a-SpCas9</td> | ||
+ | <td>Entryvector for simple fgRNA cloning via SapI</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237001" target="_blank">BBa_K5237001</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit: dMbCas12a-Nucleoplasmin NLS</td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with fgRNA and dCas9 </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237002" target="_blank">BBa_K5237002</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit: SV40 NLS-dSpCas9-SV40 NLS</td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with our fgRNA or dCas12a | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237003" target="_blank">BBa_K5237003</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Cas-Staple: SV40 NLS-dMbCas12a-dSpCas9-Nucleoplasmin NLS</td> | ||
+ | <td>Functional Cas staple that can be combined with sgRNA or fgRNA to bring two DNA strands in close proximity | ||
+ | </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237004" target="_blank">BBa_K5237004</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit: Oct1-DBD</td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with TetR.<br> | ||
+ | Can also be combined with a fluorescent protein as part of the FRET proximity assay</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237005" target="_blank">BBa_K5237005</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit: TetR</td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with Oct1.<br> | ||
+ | Can also be combined with a fluorescent protein as part of the FRET proximity assay</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237006" target="_blank">BBa_K5237006</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Simple taple: TetR-Oct1</td> | ||
+ | <td>Functional staple that can be used to bring two DNA strands in close proximity</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237007" target="_blank">BBa_K5237007</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit: GCN4</td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with rGCN4</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237008" target="_blank">BBa_K5237008</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit: rGCN4</td> | ||
+ | <td>Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with rGCN4</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237009" target="_blank">BBa_K5237009</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Mini staple: bGCN4</td> | ||
+ | <td> | ||
+ | Assembled staple with minimal size that can be further engineered</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tbody> | ||
+ | <td colspan="3" align="left"><b>Functional elements: </b> | ||
+ | Protease cleavable peptide linkers and inteins are used to control and modify staples for further optimization | ||
+ | for custom applications.</td> | ||
+ | <tbody> | ||
+ | <tr bgcolor="#FFD700"> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237010" target="_blank">BBa_K5237010</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Cathepsin B-Cleavable Linker (GFLG)</td> | ||
+ | <td>Cathepsin B cleavable peptide linker, that can be used to combine two staple subunits ,to make responsive | ||
+ | staples</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237011" target="_blank">BBa_K5237011</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Cathepsin B Expression Cassette</td> | ||
+ | <td>Cathepsin B which can be selectively express to cut the cleavable linker</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K52370012" target="_blank">BBa_K5237012</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Caged NpuN Intein</td> | ||
+ | <td>Undergoes protein transsplicing after protease activation, can be used to create functionalized staple | ||
+ | units</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K52370013" target="_blank">BBa_K5237013</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Caged NpuC Intein</td> | ||
+ | <td>Undergoes protein transsplicing after protease activation, can be used to create functionalized staple | ||
+ | units</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K52370014" target="_blank">BBa_K5237014</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>fgRNA processing casette</td> | ||
+ | <td>Processing casette to produce multiple fgRNAs from one transcript, can be used for multiplexing</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K52370015" target="_blank">BBa_K5237015</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Intimin anti-EGFR Nanobody</td> | ||
+ | <td>Interkindom conjugation between bacteria and mammalian cells, as alternative delivery tool for large | ||
+ | constructs</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tbody> | ||
+ | <td colspan="3" align="left"><b>Readout Systems: </b> | ||
+ | FRET and enhancer recruitment to measure proximity of stapled DNA in bacterial and mammalian living cells | ||
+ | enabling swift testing and easy development for new systems.</td> | ||
+ | <tbody> | ||
+ | <tr bgcolor="#FFD700"> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K52370016" target="_blank">BBa_K5237016</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>FRET-Donor: mNeonGreen-Oct1</td> | ||
+ | <td>Donor part for the FRET assay binding the Oct1 binding cassette. Can be used to visualize DNA-DNA | ||
+ | proximity</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr bgcolor="#FFD700"> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237017" target="_blank">BBa_K5237017</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>FRET-Acceptor: TetR-mScarlet-I</td> | ||
+ | <td>Acceptor part for the FRET assay binding the TetR binding cassette. Can be used to visualize DNA-DNA | ||
+ | proximity</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237018" target="_blank">BBa_K5237018</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Oct1 Binding Casette</td> | ||
+ | <td>DNA sequence containing 12 Oct1 binding motifs, can be used for different assays such as the FRET | ||
+ | proximity assay</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237019" target="_blank">BBa_K5237019</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>TetR Binding Cassette</td> | ||
+ | <td>DNA sequence containing 12 Oct1 binding motifs, can be used for different assays such as the FRET | ||
+ | proximity assay</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237020" target="_blank">BBa_K5237020</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Cathepsin B-Cleavable Trans-Activator: NLS-Gal4-GFLG-VP64</td> | ||
+ | <td>Readout system that responds to protease activity. It was used to test Cathepsin-B cleavable linker.</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237021" target="_blank">BBa_K5237021</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>NLS-Gal4-VP64</td> | ||
+ | <td>Trans-activating enhancer, that can be used to simulate enhancer hijacking. </td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237022" target="_blank">BBa_K5237022</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>mCherry Expression Cassette: UAS, minimal Promotor, mCherry</td> | ||
+ | <td>Readout system for enhancer binding. It was used to test Cathepsin-B cleavable linker.</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237023" target="_blank">BBa_K5237023</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>Oct1 - 5x UAS binding casette</td> | ||
+ | <td>Oct1 and UAS binding cassette, that was used for the simulated enhancer hijacking assay.</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | <tr> | ||
+ | <td><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5237024" target="_blank">BBa_K5237024</a></td> | ||
+ | <td>TRE-minimal promoter- firefly luciferase</td> | ||
+ | <td>Contains Firefly luciferase controlled by a minimal promoter. It was used as a luminescence readout for | ||
+ | simulated enhancer hijacking.</td> | ||
+ | </tr> | ||
+ | </tbody> | ||
+ | </table> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | <section id="1"> | ||
+ | <h1>1. Sequence overview</h1> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | </body> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <!--################################--> | ||
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K5237009 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K5237009 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
+ | <!--################################--> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | <section id="2"> | ||
+ | <h1>2. Usage and Biology</h1> | ||
+ | <p>Small basic-region leucine zipper (bZip) proteins are characterized by their DNA-binding. The bZip motif | ||
+ | consists of a coiled-coil leucine zipper dimerization domain, and a highly charged basic region that directly | ||
+ | contacts and binds to DNA (Hollenbeck & Oakley, 2000). One well characterized example is the General Control Protein | ||
+ | 4 (GCN4), a well-characterized transcriptional activator from yeast (Arndt & Fink, 1986). At its N-terminus, GCN4 | ||
+ | contains basic residues, the so-called bZip domain, through which it binds specifically to the CRE (cyclic AMP | ||
+ | response element) DNA sequence (5' ATGACGTCAT 3') (Hollenbeck <i>et al.</i>, 2002). A variant of GCN4 with the DNA | ||
+ | binding bZip-domain | ||
+ | at the C-terminus (rGCN4) has been engineered to bind to the inverted CRE sequence, INV2 (5' GTCAtaTGAC 3', upper | ||
+ | case letters indicate direct interaction between protein and DNA) with similar affinity | ||
+ | (Hollenbeck <i>et al.</i>, 2001). By genetically fusing GCN4 to rGCN4, we created a small bivalent DNA binding | ||
+ | staple with less than 150 amino acids, which was for its DNA binding and stapling capabilities.</p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | <section id="3"> | ||
+ | <h1>3. Assembly and part evolution</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The amino acid sequence for GCN4 and rGCN4 was obtained from literature (Hollenbeck & Oakley 1999), and | ||
+ | codon-optimized for <i>Escherichia coli</i>. | ||
+ | The two leucine zipper were combined with a GSG linker harbouring a BamHI site to adapt the construct with different | ||
+ | linker designs. | ||
+ | A FLAG-tag (DYKDDDDK) was added to the N-terminus for protein purification. The FLAG-tag can be cleaved off using an | ||
+ | Enterokinase, if necessary. | ||
+ | The FLAG-GCN4 sequence was cloned into a T7 expression vector and expressed using <i>E. coli</i> BL21 (DE3) cells. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | <section id="4"> | ||
+ | <h1>4. Results</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The current version of the part with GCN4-rGCN4 fusion, linked by a GSG peptide linker has not demonstrated any DNA | ||
+ | binding in the tests conducted thus far. | ||
+ | Nevertheless, we belive the part to still be a valuable addition, as it can be further engineered with different | ||
+ | linker types to | ||
+ | create a functioning staple. Through dry lab modelling, various linker designs have already been simulated to | ||
+ | predict | ||
+ | improved dimerization and DNA binding. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <section id="4.1"> | ||
+ | <h1>4.1 Protein Expression and Purification</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The bZip proteins GCN4, rGCN4 and their fusion bGCN4 were fused N-terminally to a FLAG-tag (DYKDDDDK). All | ||
+ | proteins could be readily | ||
+ | expressed under the T7 promoter in <i class=”italic”>E. coli</i> BL21 DE3 and purified with Anti-FLAG affinity | ||
+ | columns. The purity of the proteins was confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Figure 2). | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="thumb"></div> | ||
+ | <div class="thumbinner" style="width:550px"><img alt="" | ||
+ | src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5237/wetlab-results/mist-sds-page-expression-validation.svg" | ||
+ | style="width:99%;" class="thumbimage"> | ||
+ | <div class="thumbcaption"> | ||
+ | <i><b>Figure 2: SDS-PAGE analysis of protein purification.</b>Analysis of fractions eluate of purified protein | ||
+ | taken during Anti-FLAG affinity chromatography | ||
+ | 1 µL of each sample was prepared with Leammli buffer and loaded on 4-15% TGX-Gel. Correct bands of interest | ||
+ | are highlighted by red</i> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <section id="4.2"> | ||
+ | <h1>4.2 Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | The Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) is a widely adopted method used to study DNA-protein | ||
+ | interactions. EMSa functions on the basis that nucleic acids bound to proteins have reduced electrophoretic | ||
+ | mobility, compared to their counterpart. (Hellman & Fried, 2007). Mobility-shift | ||
+ | assays can both be used to qualitatively assess DNA binding capabilities or quantitatively to determine binding | ||
+ | stoichiometry and kinetics such as the apparent dissociation constant (K<sub>d</sub>) (Fried, 1989). | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1>4.2.1 Qualitative DNA binding analysis</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | To asses possible DNA binding, a qualitative EMSA was performed with the purified proteins. The same binding | ||
+ | buffer conditions were used, as previously desribed for GCN4 and rGCN4 (Hollenbeck <i>et al.</i> 2001). | ||
+ | DNA binding could only be shown for GCN4 and rGCN4, no visible band was observed for the bGCN4 fusion protein | ||
+ | (Figure 3). | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <div class="thumb"> | ||
+ | <div class="thumbinner" style="width:550px"><img alt="" | ||
+ | src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5237/wetlab-results/mist-emsa-quali.svg" style="width:99%;" | ||
+ | class="thumbimage"> | ||
+ | <div class="thumbcaption"> | ||
+ | <i><b>Figure 3: Qualitative EMSA DNA binding</b> | ||
+ | 0.5 µM of annealed oligos (20 bp) containing either one CRE or INVii binding site were incubated with 200 | ||
+ | µM | ||
+ | of protein | ||
+ | and equilibrated in binding buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na <sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>, 1.8 mM | ||
+ | KH<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub>, 0.1 % (v/v) IGEPAL® CA-360, 1 mM EDTA). Gel electorphoresis was | ||
+ | performed with a pre-equilibrated TGX-Gel in TBE running buffer. | ||
+ | Gel-bands were visualized by staining with SYBR Safe and imaged with an UV transilluminator.</i> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | <section> | ||
+ | <h1>4.2.2 Quantitative DNA binding analysis</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | To further analyze DNA binding, quantitative shift assays were performed for GCN4 and rGCN4. Here | ||
+ | 0.5 µM DNA were incubated with varying concentrations of protein until equilibration. After | ||
+ | electrophoresis, bands were stained with SYBR-Safe and quantified based on pixel intensity. The | ||
+ | obtained values were fitted to equation 1, describing formation of a 2:1 protein-DNA complex: | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | Θ<sub>app</sub> = Θ<sub>min</sub> + (Θ<sub>max</sub> - Θ<sub>min</sub>) × | ||
+ | (K<sub>a</sub><sup>2</sup> [L]<sub>tot</sub><sup>2</sup>) / (1 + K<sub>a</sub><sup>2</sup> | ||
+ | [L]<sub>tot</sub><sup>2</sup>) | ||
+ | <span style="float: right;">Equation 1</span> | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | Here [L]<sub>tot</sub> describes the total protein monomer concentration, K<sub>a</sub> | ||
+ | corresponds | ||
+ | to the apparent monomeric equilibration constant. The Θ<sub>min/max</sub> values are the | ||
+ | experimentally | ||
+ | determined site saturation values (For this experiment 0 and 1 were chosen for min and max | ||
+ | respectively). GCN4 binds to its optimal DNA binding motif with an apparent dissociation | ||
+ | constant K<sub>k</sub> of (0.2930.033)×10<sup>-6</sup> M, which is almost identical to the | ||
+ | rGCN4 binding | ||
+ | affinity to INVii a <sub>d</sub> of (0.2980.030)×10<sup>-6</sup> M. | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <div class="thumb"> | ||
+ | <div class="thumbinner" style="width:550px"><img alt="" | ||
+ | src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5237/wetlab-results/mist-leucine-zipper-kd-plot.svg" style="width:99%;" | ||
+ | class="thumbimage"> | ||
+ | <div class="thumbcaption"> | ||
+ | <i><b>Figure 4: K<sub>d</sub> Calculation of GCN4 and rGCN4</b> | ||
+ | Quantitative assessment of binding affinity for GCN4 and rGCN4. Proteins of varying | ||
+ | concentrations were incubated with 0.5 µM DNA (20 bp, containing one binding site for CRE or INVii) in | ||
+ | Binding buffer 1, and the bound fraction | ||
+ | analyzed by dividing pixel intensity of bound fraction with pixel intensity of bound and unbound fraction | ||
+ | using ImageJ. At | ||
+ | least three separate measurements were conducted for each data point. Values are presented as mean +/- | ||
+ | SD</i> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | </div> | ||
+ | |||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | <p><br><br> | ||
+ | To better understand the proteins, quantitative analysis was done to determine the apparent dissociation constant | ||
+ | for GCN4 and rGCN4. <br> | ||
+ | For the purified proteins GCN4, rGCN4 and the fusion bGCN4 a qualitative gel was run with high protein concentration (Figure 3). | ||
+ | Bands for GCN4 and rGCN4 were visible but no band for bGCN4 could be detected, indicating a | ||
+ | lack of DNA binding. This suggests that the dimerization, necessary for DNA binding, is disrupted by the | ||
+ | GSG-linker (Ellenberger <i class="italic">et al.</i>, 1992; Liu <i class="italic">et al.</i>, 2006; Lupas | ||
+ | <i class="italic">et al.</i>, 2017; Woolfson, 2023). To better understand possible problems in dimerization circular dichroism can be used to analyze secondary structure | ||
+ | and proper coiled coil formation (Greenfield, 2006). Further engineering can be done by testing out | ||
+ | various linkers with specific properties to ensure correct folding and dimerization (Chen <i class="italic">et | ||
+ | al.</i>, 2013). The apparent binding kinetics calculated for GCN4 ((0.2930.033) × 10<sup>-6</sup> M) and rGCN4 | ||
+ | ((0.2980.030) × 10<sup>-6</sup> M) are | ||
+ | approximately a factor 10 higher then those described in literature ((96) × 10<sup>-8</sup> M for | ||
+ | GCN4 and (2.90.8) × 10<sup>-8</sup> M for rGCN4) (Hollenbeck <i class="italic">et al.</i>, 2001). The | ||
+ | differences could be due to the lower sensitivity of SYBR-Safe | ||
+ | staining compared to radio-labeled oligos. | ||
+ | <br><br> | ||
+ | The FLAG-tag fusion to the N-terminus of proteins could potentially decrease binding affinity, likely due | ||
+ | to steric hindrance affecting the interaction with DNA. Interestingly, the differences in binding affinity | ||
+ | between GCN4 and rGCN4 appear negligible. Since GCN4 binds to DNA via its N-terminus and rGCN4 binds | ||
+ | C-terminally, the FLAG-tag likely does not directly influence DNA binding. However, it may influence the | ||
+ | dimerization of the proteins, which is necessary for DNA binding. To further investigate this, the | ||
+ | FLAG-tag can be cleaved using an enterokinase and potential changes in binding affinity analyzed | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | <section id="5"> | ||
+ | <h1>5. References</h1> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Arndt, K. T., & Fink, G. R. (1986). GCN4 protein, a positive transcription factor in yeast, binds general control promoters at all 5′ TGACTC 3′ sequences. <i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83</i>(22), 8516–8520. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.22.8516" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.22.8516</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Chen, X., Zaro, J. L., & Shen, W. C. (2013). Fusion protein linkers: property, design and functionality. <i>Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 65</i>(10), 1357–1369. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.039" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.039</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Ellenberger, T. E., Brandl, C. J., Struhl, K., & Harrison, S. C. (1992). The GCN4 basic region leucine zipper binds DNA as a dimer of uninterrupted α helices: crystal structure of the protein-DNA complex. <i>Cell, 71</i>(7), 1223–1237. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90648-E" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90648-E</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Fried, M. G. (1989). Measurement of protein-DNA interaction parameters by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. <i>Electrophoresis, 10</i>(5–6), 366–376. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150100515" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150100515</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Greenfield, N. J. (2006). Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. <i>Nature Protocols, 1</i>(6), 2876–2890. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.202" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.202</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Hellman, L. M., & Fried, M. G. (2007). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) for detecting protein-nucleic acid interactions. <i>Nature Protocols, 2</i>(8), 1849–1861. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.249" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.249</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Hollenbeck, J. J., & Oakley, M. G. (2000). GCN4 binds with high affinity to DNA sequences containing a single consensus half-site. <i>Biochemistry, 39</i>(21), 6380–6389. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/bi992705n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/bi992705n</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Hollenbeck, J. J., Gurnon, D. G., Fazio, G. C., Carlson, J. J., & Oakley, M. G. (2001). A GCN4 variant with a C-terminal basic region binds to DNA with wild-type affinity. <i>Biochemistry, 40</i>(46), 13833–13839. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0106916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0106916</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Liu, J., Zheng, Q., Deng, Y., Cheng, C. S., Kallenbach, N. R., & Lu, M. (2006). A seven-helix coiled coil. <i>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103</i>(43), 15457–15462. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606789103" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606789103</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Lupas, A. N., & Bassler, J. (2017). Coiled coils—a model system for the 21st century. <i>Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 42</i>(2), 130–140. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2016.10.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2016.10.007</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Woolfson, D. N. (2023). The design of coiled-coil structures and assemblies. <i>Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology, 133</i>, 35–64. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2023.02.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2023.02.002</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | <p> | ||
+ | Wu, W., Zhang, L., Yao, L., Tan, X., Liu, X., & Lu, X. (2015). Genetically assembled fluorescent biosensor for in situ detection of bio-synthesized alkanes. <i>Scientific Reports, 5</i>, 10907. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10907" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10907</a> | ||
+ | </p> | ||
+ | </section> | ||
+ | </body> | ||
− | + | </html> | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + |
Revision as of 02:28, 29 September 2024
Mini staple:
The Mini staple is a fuion of GCN4 and rGCN4, engineered to bind two DNA strands simultaneously and induce proximity.
Contents
The 3D organization of the genome plays a crucial role in regulating gene expression in eukaryotic cells,
impacting cellular behavior, evolution, and disease. Beyond the linear DNA sequence, the spatial arrangement of
chromatin, influenced by DNA-DNA interactions, shapes pathways of gene regulation. However, the tools to precisely
manipulate this genomic architecture remain limited, rendering it challenging to explore the full potential of the
3D genome in synthetic biology. We - iGEM Team Heidelberg 2024 - have developed PICasSO, a powerful molecular
toolbox based on various DNA-binding proteins to address this issue.
The PICasSO part collection offers a comprehensive, modular platform for precise manipulation and re-programming of DNA-DNA interactions using protein staples in living cells, enabling researchers to recreate natural 3D genomic interactions, such as enhancer hijacking, or to design entirely new spatial architectures for gene regulation. Beyond its versatility, PICasSO includes robust assay systems to support the engineering, optimization, and testing of new staples, ensuring functionality in vitro and in vivo. We took special care to include parts crucial for testing every step of the cycle (design, build, test, learn) when engineering new parts
At its heart, the PICasSO part collection consists of three categories. (i) Our DNA-binding proteins include our finalized enhancer hijacking Cas staple as well as half staples that can be used by scientists to compose entirely new Cas staples in the future. We also include our simple staples that serve as controls for successful stapling and can be further engineered to create alternative, simpler and more compact staples. (ii) As functional elements, we list additional parts that enhance the functionality of our Cas and Basic staples. These consist of protease-cleavable peptide linkers and inteins that allow condition-specific, dynamic stapling in vivo. Besides staple functionality, we also include the parts to enable the efficient delivery of PICasSO's with our interkingdom conjugation system.
(iii) As the final component of our collection, we provide parts that support the use of our custom readout systems. These include components of our established FRET-based proximity assay system, enabling users to confirm accurate stapling. Additionally, we offer a complementary, application-oriented testing system for functional readout via a luciferase reporter, which allows for straightforward experimental simulation of enhancer hijacking.
The following table gives a complete overview of all parts in our PICasSO toolbox. The highlighted parts showed exceptional performance as described on our iGEM wiki and can serve as a reference. The other parts in the collection are versatile building blocks designed to provide future iGEMers with the flexibility to engineer their own custom Cas staples, enabling further optimization and innovation
Our part collection includes:
DNA-binding proteins: The building blocks for engineering of custom staples for DNA-DNA interactions with a modular system ensuring easy assembly. | ||
BBa_K5237000 | fgRNA Entryvector MbCas12a-SpCas9 | Entryvector for simple fgRNA cloning via SapI |
BBa_K5237001 | Staple subunit: dMbCas12a-Nucleoplasmin NLS | Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with fgRNA and dCas9 |
BBa_K5237002 | Staple subunit: SV40 NLS-dSpCas9-SV40 NLS | Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with our fgRNA or dCas12a |
BBa_K5237003 | Cas-Staple: SV40 NLS-dMbCas12a-dSpCas9-Nucleoplasmin NLS | Functional Cas staple that can be combined with sgRNA or fgRNA to bring two DNA strands in close proximity |
BBa_K5237004 | Staple subunit: Oct1-DBD | Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with TetR. Can also be combined with a fluorescent protein as part of the FRET proximity assay |
BBa_K5237005 | Staple subunit: TetR | Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with Oct1. Can also be combined with a fluorescent protein as part of the FRET proximity assay |
BBa_K5237006 | Simple taple: TetR-Oct1 | Functional staple that can be used to bring two DNA strands in close proximity |
BBa_K5237007 | Staple subunit: GCN4 | Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with rGCN4 |
BBa_K5237008 | Staple subunit: rGCN4 | Staple subunit that can be combined to form a functional staple, for example with rGCN4 |
BBa_K5237009 | Mini staple: bGCN4 | Assembled staple with minimal size that can be further engineered | Functional elements: Protease cleavable peptide linkers and inteins are used to control and modify staples for further optimization for custom applications. |
BBa_K5237010 | Cathepsin B-Cleavable Linker (GFLG) | Cathepsin B cleavable peptide linker, that can be used to combine two staple subunits ,to make responsive staples |
BBa_K5237011 | Cathepsin B Expression Cassette | Cathepsin B which can be selectively express to cut the cleavable linker |
BBa_K5237012 | Caged NpuN Intein | Undergoes protein transsplicing after protease activation, can be used to create functionalized staple units |
BBa_K5237013 | Caged NpuC Intein | Undergoes protein transsplicing after protease activation, can be used to create functionalized staple units |
BBa_K5237014 | fgRNA processing casette | Processing casette to produce multiple fgRNAs from one transcript, can be used for multiplexing |
BBa_K5237015 | Intimin anti-EGFR Nanobody | Interkindom conjugation between bacteria and mammalian cells, as alternative delivery tool for large constructs | Readout Systems: FRET and enhancer recruitment to measure proximity of stapled DNA in bacterial and mammalian living cells enabling swift testing and easy development for new systems. |
BBa_K5237016 | FRET-Donor: mNeonGreen-Oct1 | Donor part for the FRET assay binding the Oct1 binding cassette. Can be used to visualize DNA-DNA proximity |
BBa_K5237017 | FRET-Acceptor: TetR-mScarlet-I | Acceptor part for the FRET assay binding the TetR binding cassette. Can be used to visualize DNA-DNA proximity |
BBa_K5237018 | Oct1 Binding Casette | DNA sequence containing 12 Oct1 binding motifs, can be used for different assays such as the FRET proximity assay |
BBa_K5237019 | TetR Binding Cassette | DNA sequence containing 12 Oct1 binding motifs, can be used for different assays such as the FRET proximity assay | BBa_K5237020 | Cathepsin B-Cleavable Trans-Activator: NLS-Gal4-GFLG-VP64 | Readout system that responds to protease activity. It was used to test Cathepsin-B cleavable linker. |
BBa_K5237021 | NLS-Gal4-VP64 | Trans-activating enhancer, that can be used to simulate enhancer hijacking. | BBa_K5237022 | mCherry Expression Cassette: UAS, minimal Promotor, mCherry | Readout system for enhancer binding. It was used to test Cathepsin-B cleavable linker. |
BBa_K5237023 | Oct1 - 5x UAS binding casette | Oct1 and UAS binding cassette, that was used for the simulated enhancer hijacking assay. |
BBa_K5237024 | TRE-minimal promoter- firefly luciferase | Contains Firefly luciferase controlled by a minimal promoter. It was used as a luminescence readout for simulated enhancer hijacking. |
1. Sequence overview
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 175
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Small basic-region leucine zipper (bZip) proteins are characterized by their DNA-binding. The bZip motif
consists of a coiled-coil leucine zipper dimerization domain, and a highly charged basic region that directly
contacts and binds to DNA (Hollenbeck & Oakley, 2000). One well characterized example is the General Control Protein
4 (GCN4), a well-characterized transcriptional activator from yeast (Arndt & Fink, 1986). At its N-terminus, GCN4
contains basic residues, the so-called bZip domain, through which it binds specifically to the CRE (cyclic AMP
response element) DNA sequence (5' ATGACGTCAT 3') (Hollenbeck et al., 2002). A variant of GCN4 with the DNA
binding bZip-domain
at the C-terminus (rGCN4) has been engineered to bind to the inverted CRE sequence, INV2 (5' GTCAtaTGAC 3', upper
case letters indicate direct interaction between protein and DNA) with similar affinity
(Hollenbeck et al., 2001). By genetically fusing GCN4 to rGCN4, we created a small bivalent DNA binding
staple with less than 150 amino acids, which was for its DNA binding and stapling capabilities.
The amino acid sequence for GCN4 and rGCN4 was obtained from literature (Hollenbeck & Oakley 1999), and
codon-optimized for Escherichia coli.
The two leucine zipper were combined with a GSG linker harbouring a BamHI site to adapt the construct with different
linker designs.
A FLAG-tag (DYKDDDDK) was added to the N-terminus for protein purification. The FLAG-tag can be cleaved off using an
Enterokinase, if necessary.
The FLAG-GCN4 sequence was cloned into a T7 expression vector and expressed using E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells.
The current version of the part with GCN4-rGCN4 fusion, linked by a GSG peptide linker has not demonstrated any DNA
binding in the tests conducted thus far.
Nevertheless, we belive the part to still be a valuable addition, as it can be further engineered with different
linker types to
create a functioning staple. Through dry lab modelling, various linker designs have already been simulated to
predict
improved dimerization and DNA binding.
The bZip proteins GCN4, rGCN4 and their fusion bGCN4 were fused N-terminally to a FLAG-tag (DYKDDDDK). All
proteins could be readily
expressed under the T7 promoter in E. coli BL21 DE3 and purified with Anti-FLAG affinity
columns. The purity of the proteins was confirmed by SDS-PAGE (Figure 2).
2. Usage and Biology
3. Assembly and part evolution
4. Results
4.1 Protein Expression and Purification
4.2 Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
The Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) is a widely adopted method used to study DNA-protein interactions. EMSa functions on the basis that nucleic acids bound to proteins have reduced electrophoretic mobility, compared to their counterpart. (Hellman & Fried, 2007). Mobility-shift assays can both be used to qualitatively assess DNA binding capabilities or quantitatively to determine binding stoichiometry and kinetics such as the apparent dissociation constant (Kd) (Fried, 1989).
4.2.1 Qualitative DNA binding analysis
To asses possible DNA binding, a qualitative EMSA was performed with the purified proteins. The same binding buffer conditions were used, as previously desribed for GCN4 and rGCN4 (Hollenbeck et al. 2001). DNA binding could only be shown for GCN4 and rGCN4, no visible band was observed for the bGCN4 fusion protein (Figure 3).
4.2.2 Quantitative DNA binding analysis
To further analyze DNA binding, quantitative shift assays were performed for GCN4 and rGCN4. Here
0.5 µM DNA were incubated with varying concentrations of protein until equilibration. After
electrophoresis, bands were stained with SYBR-Safe and quantified based on pixel intensity. The
obtained values were fitted to equation 1, describing formation of a 2:1 protein-DNA complex:
Θapp = Θmin + (Θmax - Θmin) ×
(Ka2 [L]tot2) / (1 + Ka2
[L]tot2)
Equation 1
Here [L]tot describes the total protein monomer concentration, Ka
corresponds
to the apparent monomeric equilibration constant. The Θmin/max values are the
experimentally
determined site saturation values (For this experiment 0 and 1 were chosen for min and max
respectively). GCN4 binds to its optimal DNA binding motif with an apparent dissociation
constant Kk of (0.2930.033)×10-6 M, which is almost identical to the
rGCN4 binding
affinity to INVii a d of (0.2980.030)×10-6 M.
To better understand the proteins, quantitative analysis was done to determine the apparent dissociation constant
for GCN4 and rGCN4.
For the purified proteins GCN4, rGCN4 and the fusion bGCN4 a qualitative gel was run with high protein concentration (Figure 3).
Bands for GCN4 and rGCN4 were visible but no band for bGCN4 could be detected, indicating a
lack of DNA binding. This suggests that the dimerization, necessary for DNA binding, is disrupted by the
GSG-linker (Ellenberger et al., 1992; Liu et al., 2006; Lupas
et al., 2017; Woolfson, 2023). To better understand possible problems in dimerization circular dichroism can be used to analyze secondary structure
and proper coiled coil formation (Greenfield, 2006). Further engineering can be done by testing out
various linkers with specific properties to ensure correct folding and dimerization (Chen et
al., 2013). The apparent binding kinetics calculated for GCN4 ((0.2930.033) × 10-6 M) and rGCN4
((0.2980.030) × 10-6 M) are
approximately a factor 10 higher then those described in literature ((96) × 10-8 M for
GCN4 and (2.90.8) × 10-8 M for rGCN4) (Hollenbeck et al., 2001). The
differences could be due to the lower sensitivity of SYBR-Safe
staining compared to radio-labeled oligos.
The FLAG-tag fusion to the N-terminus of proteins could potentially decrease binding affinity, likely due
to steric hindrance affecting the interaction with DNA. Interestingly, the differences in binding affinity
between GCN4 and rGCN4 appear negligible. Since GCN4 binds to DNA via its N-terminus and rGCN4 binds
C-terminally, the FLAG-tag likely does not directly influence DNA binding. However, it may influence the
dimerization of the proteins, which is necessary for DNA binding. To further investigate this, the
FLAG-tag can be cleaved using an enterokinase and potential changes in binding affinity analyzed
5. References
Arndt, K. T., & Fink, G. R. (1986). GCN4 protein, a positive transcription factor in yeast, binds general control promoters at all 5′ TGACTC 3′ sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 83(22), 8516–8520. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.22.8516
Chen, X., Zaro, J. L., & Shen, W. C. (2013). Fusion protein linkers: property, design and functionality. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 65(10), 1357–1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.039
Ellenberger, T. E., Brandl, C. J., Struhl, K., & Harrison, S. C. (1992). The GCN4 basic region leucine zipper binds DNA as a dimer of uninterrupted α helices: crystal structure of the protein-DNA complex. Cell, 71(7), 1223–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(92)90648-E
Fried, M. G. (1989). Measurement of protein-DNA interaction parameters by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Electrophoresis, 10(5–6), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150100515
Greenfield, N. J. (2006). Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nature Protocols, 1(6), 2876–2890. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.202
Hellman, L. M., & Fried, M. G. (2007). Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) for detecting protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nature Protocols, 2(8), 1849–1861. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.249
Hollenbeck, J. J., & Oakley, M. G. (2000). GCN4 binds with high affinity to DNA sequences containing a single consensus half-site. Biochemistry, 39(21), 6380–6389. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi992705n
Hollenbeck, J. J., Gurnon, D. G., Fazio, G. C., Carlson, J. J., & Oakley, M. G. (2001). A GCN4 variant with a C-terminal basic region binds to DNA with wild-type affinity. Biochemistry, 40(46), 13833–13839. https://doi.org/10.1021/bi0106916
Liu, J., Zheng, Q., Deng, Y., Cheng, C. S., Kallenbach, N. R., & Lu, M. (2006). A seven-helix coiled coil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(43), 15457–15462. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606789103
Lupas, A. N., & Bassler, J. (2017). Coiled coils—a model system for the 21st century. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 42(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2016.10.007
Woolfson, D. N. (2023). The design of coiled-coil structures and assemblies. Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology, 133, 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apcsb.2023.02.002
Wu, W., Zhang, L., Yao, L., Tan, X., Liu, X., & Lu, X. (2015). Genetically assembled fluorescent biosensor for in situ detection of bio-synthesized alkanes. Scientific Reports, 5, 10907. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10907