Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K079031:Experience"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Dh5alpha cells transformed with BBa_K079032 and BBa_K079031 were inoculated | Dh5alpha cells transformed with BBa_K079032 and BBa_K079031 were inoculated | ||
| − | in M9 medium at 8.00 p.m. after O/N growth (about 12 h), samples were collected and slide prepared for image acquisition with the microscope. Images were then analyzed with the [http://2009.igem.org/Team:Bologna/Software VIFluoR] software. To obtain a significant representation of bacterium fluorescence, it was necessary to acquire several images, each one reporting a sufficient number of bacterial cells. VIFluoR operates the image segmentation and then recognises the bacterial cells yielding the mean fluorescence per bacterium as the output. | + | in [http://2009.igem.org/Team:Bologna/WetlabProtocols M9 medium] at 8.00 p.m. after O/N growth (about 12 h), samples were collected and slide prepared for image acquisition with the optical microscope. Images were then analyzed with the [http://2009.igem.org/Team:Bologna/Software VIFluoR] software. To obtain a significant representation of bacterium fluorescence, it was necessary to acquire several images, each one reporting a sufficient number of bacterial cells. VIFluoR operates the image segmentation and then recognises the bacterial cells yielding the mean fluorescence per bacterium as the output. |
| − | The BBa_K079032/ BBa_K079031 fluorescence ratio was equal to 1.20±0.4 (Table 1). | + | The final BBa_K079032/ BBa_K079031 fluorescence ratio was equal to 1.20±0.4 (Table 1). |
[[Image:TabellaPromotori3.png|center|400px |thumb|Table 1 - Promoter fluorescence ratio after microscope analysis]] | [[Image:TabellaPromotori3.png|center|400px |thumb|Table 1 - Promoter fluorescence ratio after microscope analysis]] | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
As it can be seen from the figures above, data from the fluorimeter analysis agreed with the microscope image analysis. Indeed, the promoter fluorescence ratio was about 1.2. | As it can be seen from the figures above, data from the fluorimeter analysis agreed with the microscope image analysis. Indeed, the promoter fluorescence ratio was about 1.2. | ||
| + | From the figures above, it can be noticed that the fluorescence expression levels are different in the different bacterial phases of growth. | ||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K079031 StartReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K079031 StartReviews</partinfo> | ||
Revision as of 20:33, 21 October 2009
Dh5alpha cells transformed with BBa_K079032 and BBa_K079031 were inoculated
in [http://2009.igem.org/Team:Bologna/WetlabProtocols M9 medium] at 8.00 p.m. after O/N growth (about 12 h), samples were collected and slide prepared for image acquisition with the optical microscope. Images were then analyzed with the [http://2009.igem.org/Team:Bologna/Software VIFluoR] software. To obtain a significant representation of bacterium fluorescence, it was necessary to acquire several images, each one reporting a sufficient number of bacterial cells. VIFluoR operates the image segmentation and then recognises the bacterial cells yielding the mean fluorescence per bacterium as the output.
The final BBa_K079032/ BBa_K079031 fluorescence ratio was equal to 1.20±0.4 (Table 1).
The same samples were diluited to an OD equal 0.1 and a growth in time was performed with a Tekcan spectrofluorimeter. Both optical density (OD) and fluorescence level were analized for 12 h (Fig.1 and Fig.2, respectively). Fluorescence was then normalized on the OD value (Fig.3).
As it can be seen from the figures above, data from the fluorimeter analysis agreed with the microscope image analysis. Indeed, the promoter fluorescence ratio was about 1.2. From the figures above, it can be noticed that the fluorescence expression levels are different in the different bacterial phases of growth.
UNIQ3ffb9fa2b0aebd0f-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ3ffb9fa2b0aebd0f-partinfo-00000001-QINU