Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K5193003"
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
This is a type of lipase used to esterify alcohol and acid into ester. In order to enhance the scent of our essential oil, we aimed to increase the amount of ester by using lipase (lip4) to catalyze acid and alcohol into ester.[1] See graph 1 for the mechanism of lipase-catalyzed esterification. | This is a type of lipase used to esterify alcohol and acid into ester. In order to enhance the scent of our essential oil, we aimed to increase the amount of ester by using lipase (lip4) to catalyze acid and alcohol into ester.[1] See graph 1 for the mechanism of lipase-catalyzed esterification. | ||
<html> | <html> | ||
+ | <p><a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K5193003">lip4 BBa_K5193003</a></p> | ||
<p>Experiment details: <a href="https://2024.igem.wiki/puiching-macau/new%20parts">New Parts</a></p> | <p>Experiment details: <a href="https://2024.igem.wiki/puiching-macau/new%20parts">New Parts</a></p> | ||
<p>In order to enhance the scent of our essential oil, we aimed to increase the amount of ester by using lipase (lip4) to catalyze acid and alcohol into ester.[1] See graph 1 for the mechanism of lipase-catalyzed esterification.</p> | <p>In order to enhance the scent of our essential oil, we aimed to increase the amount of ester by using lipase (lip4) to catalyze acid and alcohol into ester.[1] See graph 1 for the mechanism of lipase-catalyzed esterification.</p> | ||
Line 14: | Line 15: | ||
<h4>GCMS results</h4> | <h4>GCMS results</h4> | ||
− | <p>We first incubate flowers (raw ingredient) with lip4 crude enzyme at room temperature for half an hour, allowing the reaction to take place. Additionally, we tried incubating our essential oil extract (distilled) with enzyme extract of lip4 for 2.5 hours in a 37C 200 rpm shaker. The final esterified oil product went through Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS, equipment: Agilent 8890-7000D) to validate the change of chemical composition in essential oil with and without post-treatment. We selected the top 10 Log2 fold changes components to compare.</p> | + | <p>We first incubate flowers (raw ingredient) with lip4 crude enzyme at room temperature for half an hour, allowing the reaction to take place. Additionally, we tried incubating our essential oil extract (distilled) with enzyme extract of lip4 for 2.5 hours in a 37C 200 rpm shaker. For both groups, we centrifuged the mixture at 4956 x g for 10 minutes before taking the upper oil layer (desired product) to a new tube. The final esterified oil product went through Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS, equipment: Agilent 8890-7000D) to validate the change of chemical composition in essential oil with and without post-treatment. We selected the top 10 Log2 fold changes components to compare.</p> |
<center><figure> | <center><figure> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/4-vs-pet11a-topfcbarchart-compounds.png" style="width: 600px;"></a> | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/4-vs-pet11a-topfcbarchart-compounds.png" style="width: 600px;"></a> | ||
Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
<p>As can be seen from the graph, the content of 3-methyl, 3-phenylpropyl ester increased the most with a positive 3.97 Log2 fold change when compared to essential oil added with pET11a control crude enzyme. </p> | <p>As can be seen from the graph, the content of 3-methyl, 3-phenylpropyl ester increased the most with a positive 3.97 Log2 fold change when compared to essential oil added with pET11a control crude enzyme. </p> | ||
<center><figure> | <center><figure> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/4- | + | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/4-post-treat-vs-pet11a-topfcbarchart-compounds.png" style="width: 600px;"></a> |
<center><figcaption>Figure 3. Lip4 enzyme crude extract added to the freshly produced essential oil compared to pET11a (AFTER steam distillation). </figcaption></center> | <center><figcaption>Figure 3. Lip4 enzyme crude extract added to the freshly produced essential oil compared to pET11a (AFTER steam distillation). </figcaption></center> | ||
</figure></center> | </figure></center> | ||
Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
<p>The total ion current (TIC) chromatogram shows the relative abundance of detected compounds at different retention times. By assigning peaks to different compounds with retention time, we can identify the amount of different compounds in the lavender oil sample. Generally, the TIC pattern of lip4 post-treatment, lip4, and water are similar, with conspicuous peaks at 11 and 13.7 minutes. | <p>The total ion current (TIC) chromatogram shows the relative abundance of detected compounds at different retention times. By assigning peaks to different compounds with retention time, we can identify the amount of different compounds in the lavender oil sample. Generally, the TIC pattern of lip4 post-treatment, lip4, and water are similar, with conspicuous peaks at 11 and 13.7 minutes. | ||
</p> | </p> | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | <h4>Flavor analysis</h4> | ||
+ | <p>From the detected component of the oil, we analyzed the flavor differences of lip4 pre and post treated oil with water treated oil (control). Our radar chart with top ten annotated flavors of the differentiated substance shows that lip4 incubation enhanced the sweet flavor of the oil at 20 substances, whereas lip4 post treatment enhanced the green flavor the most at 21 substances.</p> | ||
+ | <center><figure> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/lip4-vs-water-treated-lavender-oil-flavor-analysis.png" style="width: 300px;"></a> | ||
+ | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/lip4post-vs-water-treated-lavender-oil-flavor-analysis.png" style="width: 300px"></a> | ||
+ | <center><figcaption>Figure 5 and 6. The first graph: lip4 vs water treated lavender oil flavor differential analysis. The second graph: lip4 post vs water treated lavender oil flavor differential analysis. | ||
+ | </figcaption></center> | ||
+ | </figure></center> | ||
<h4>Antibacterial effect</h4> | <h4>Antibacterial effect</h4> | ||
− | <p>Ka Hong Wong from the University of Macau taught and guided our students to conduct experiments on the antibacterial effect of our lavender essential oil. Lavender essential oil has been proved to have antimicrobial properties, as essential oil caused the strain’s sensitivity to antibiotics by altering the permeability of the outer membrane of bacteria [3]. Oil with lipase pretreatment demonstrates a significant antibacterial effect. As can be seen from figure | + | <p>Ka Hong Wong from the University of Macau taught and guided our students to conduct experiments on the antibacterial effect of our lavender essential oil. Lavender essential oil has been proved to have antimicrobial properties, as essential oil caused the strain’s sensitivity to antibiotics by altering the permeability of the outer membrane of bacteria [3]. We added different concentrations of our pretreated essential oil to the bacterial culture and spread them on agar plates. Oil with lipase pretreatment demonstrates a significant antibacterial effect. As can be seen from figure 7, at the 12th hour, the relative OD600 (optical density at 600 nm) of bacterial culture added lip4 post lavender oil, at 2 ug per ml, is much lower than most samples. In short, lip4 post treatment improves the bacterial inhibition ability of lavender oil.</p> |
− | + | ||
<center><figure> | <center><figure> | ||
− | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/ | + | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/antibacterial-colony-od.png" style="width: 200px;"></a> |
− | <center><figcaption>Figure | + | <center><figcaption>Figure 7. The relative OD600 value of bacterial culture on the plate with lavender oil treated with different enzymes. Control is the essential oil treated with PET11a empty vector enzyme extract. |
</figcaption></center> | </figcaption></center> | ||
</figure></center> | </figure></center> | ||
− | <p>We also spread bacterial culture on agar plates (no antibiotic added). Our lavender oil shows strong inhibition to the bacteria. When compared to blank ( | + | <p>We also spread bacterial culture on agar plates (no antibiotic added). Our lavender oil with lip4 postreatment shows strong inhibition to the bacteria (See Fig. 8a) . When compared to blank (nothing added) with diluted bacterial culture, only adding 1 ug per ml oil can significantly reduce the area covered by bacteria (leaving colonies). Similarly, in the original bacterial concentration, both 4 ug and 2 ug per ml of lavender oil show notable antibacterial ability. In addition, when compared to blank and PET11a control treated essential oil, lip4 post significantly reduced the number of colonies (See Fig. 8b). |
</p> | </p> | ||
<center><figure> | <center><figure> | ||
<img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/lip4-antibacterial-colony.png" style="width: 600px;"></a> | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/lip4-antibacterial-colony.png" style="width: 600px;"></a> | ||
− | <center><figcaption>Figure | + | <img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/5193/wet-lab/4-post-treat-vs-pet11a-antibacterial.png" style="width: 600px;"></a> |
+ | <center><figcaption>Figure 8 a and b. (a) The plate with bacteria (diluted 10^5 times) and that with lip4 post-treated lavender oil (4 ug and 2 ug per ml added to original conc. and 1 ug per ml added to diluted culture). (b) The plate with bacteria culture (diluted 10^5 times), with 1ug PET11a control treated lavender oil, and 1ug lip4 post-treated lavender oil. | ||
</figcaption></center> | </figcaption></center> | ||
</figure></center> | </figure></center> |
Revision as of 02:51, 26 September 2024
lip4 (Candida rugosa)
This is a type of lipase used to esterify alcohol and acid into ester. In order to enhance the scent of our essential oil, we aimed to increase the amount of ester by using lipase (lip4) to catalyze acid and alcohol into ester.[1] See graph 1 for the mechanism of lipase-catalyzed esterification.
Experiment details: New Parts
In order to enhance the scent of our essential oil, we aimed to increase the amount of ester by using lipase (lip4) to catalyze acid and alcohol into ester.[1] See graph 1 for the mechanism of lipase-catalyzed esterification.
GCMS results
We first incubate flowers (raw ingredient) with lip4 crude enzyme at room temperature for half an hour, allowing the reaction to take place. Additionally, we tried incubating our essential oil extract (distilled) with enzyme extract of lip4 for 2.5 hours in a 37C 200 rpm shaker. For both groups, we centrifuged the mixture at 4956 x g for 10 minutes before taking the upper oil layer (desired product) to a new tube. The final esterified oil product went through Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS, equipment: Agilent 8890-7000D) to validate the change of chemical composition in essential oil with and without post-treatment. We selected the top 10 Log2 fold changes components to compare.
As can be seen from the graph, the content of 3-methyl, 3-phenylpropyl ester increased the most with a positive 3.97 Log2 fold change when compared to essential oil added with pET11a control crude enzyme.
The content of 3-methyl, 3-phenylpropyl ester increased the most, with a positive 3.65 Log2 fold change when compared to the pET11a group. We can therefore conclude that it might be more efficient to add our lip4 extract to the flowers before distillation to enhance ester content.
The total ion current (TIC) chromatogram shows the relative abundance of detected compounds at different retention times. By assigning peaks to different compounds with retention time, we can identify the amount of different compounds in the lavender oil sample. Generally, the TIC pattern of lip4 post-treatment, lip4, and water are similar, with conspicuous peaks at 11 and 13.7 minutes.
Flavor analysis
From the detected component of the oil, we analyzed the flavor differences of lip4 pre and post treated oil with water treated oil (control). Our radar chart with top ten annotated flavors of the differentiated substance shows that lip4 incubation enhanced the sweet flavor of the oil at 20 substances, whereas lip4 post treatment enhanced the green flavor the most at 21 substances.
Antibacterial effect
Ka Hong Wong from the University of Macau taught and guided our students to conduct experiments on the antibacterial effect of our lavender essential oil. Lavender essential oil has been proved to have antimicrobial properties, as essential oil caused the strain’s sensitivity to antibiotics by altering the permeability of the outer membrane of bacteria [3]. We added different concentrations of our pretreated essential oil to the bacterial culture and spread them on agar plates. Oil with lipase pretreatment demonstrates a significant antibacterial effect. As can be seen from figure 7, at the 12th hour, the relative OD600 (optical density at 600 nm) of bacterial culture added lip4 post lavender oil, at 2 ug per ml, is much lower than most samples. In short, lip4 post treatment improves the bacterial inhibition ability of lavender oil.
We also spread bacterial culture on agar plates (no antibiotic added). Our lavender oil with lip4 postreatment shows strong inhibition to the bacteria (See Fig. 8a) . When compared to blank (nothing added) with diluted bacterial culture, only adding 1 ug per ml oil can significantly reduce the area covered by bacteria (leaving colonies). Similarly, in the original bacterial concentration, both 4 ug and 2 ug per ml of lavender oil show notable antibacterial ability. In addition, when compared to blank and PET11a control treated essential oil, lip4 post significantly reduced the number of colonies (See Fig. 8b).
References:
- Tang SJ, Sun KH, Sun GH, Chang TY, Lee GC. Recombinant expression of the Candida rugosa lip4 lipase in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2000 Nov;20(2):308-13. doi: 10.1006/prep.2000.1304. PMID: 11049754.
- Kuo, C.-H.; Huang, C.-Y.; Lee, C.-L.; Kuo, W.-C.; Hsieh, S.-L.; Shieh, C.-J. Synthesis of DHA/EPA Ethyl Esters via Lipase-Catalyzed Acidolysis Using Novozym® 435: A Kinetic Study. Catalysts 2020, 10, 565. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10050565
- Wińska K, Mączka W, Łyczko J, Grabarczyk M, Czubaszek A, Szumny A. Essential Oils as Antimicrobial Agents-Myth or Real Alternative? Molecules. 2019 Jun 5;24(11):2130. doi: 10.3390/molecules24112130. PMID: 31195752; PMCID: PMC6612361.
Usage and Biology
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 815
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 841
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]