Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4949004"

Line 33: Line 33:
 
<html><br></html>
 
<html><br></html>
  
<html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4949/wiki/results/figure21-est119-npo-deltalpp-plasmid.png" width="950" height="450"></html>
+
<html><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4949/wiki/results/figure22-est119-npo-deltalpp-plasmid.png" width="950" height="450"></html>
 
'''Figure 4.''' Absorbance as a function of time for the whole cell esterase activity assay of Est119. After induced expression, <i>E.coli</i> BL21 (DE3) + Est119 or <i>E.coli</i> BL21 (DE3) + Est119(ΔLpp), bacteria with an Lpp deficient plasmid,  were washed and resuspended in PBS with 100µM NPO with a cell density normalized to OD<sub>600</sub>=1.0. Samples were then incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Aliquots of 100 µl were collected at 5 intervals and the absorbance of the supernatant as measured at 410 nm.  
 
'''Figure 4.''' Absorbance as a function of time for the whole cell esterase activity assay of Est119. After induced expression, <i>E.coli</i> BL21 (DE3) + Est119 or <i>E.coli</i> BL21 (DE3) + Est119(ΔLpp), bacteria with an Lpp deficient plasmid,  were washed and resuspended in PBS with 100µM NPO with a cell density normalized to OD<sub>600</sub>=1.0. Samples were then incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Aliquots of 100 µl were collected at 5 intervals and the absorbance of the supernatant as measured at 410 nm.  
 
<html><br></html>
 
<html><br></html>

Revision as of 13:37, 12 October 2023

Est119

Est119 is an esterase originally identified in the Thermobifida alba strain AHK119 (AB298783). Est119 has been shown to degrade aliphatic-aromatic copolyesters and decrease the size of polymer particles of other biodegradable plastics, with an optimal temperature range of 45-55°C (Hu and al. 2009). Similarly to MGS0156, Est119 is interesting due to its potential temperature compatibility with Manitoban composting methods. Our team modified the Est119 genetic sequence to include the Lpp-OmpA anchor to allow for the characterization of the surface-display mechanism of PLAnet Zero

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]



Figure 1. Absorbance as a function of time for the whole cell esterase activity assay of Est119. After induced expression, E.coli BL21 (DE3) + Est 119 or E.coli BL21 (DE3)ΔLpp + Est119, a native Lpp deficient stain, were washed and resuspended in PBS with 100µM NPO with a cell density normalized to OD600=1.0. Samples were then incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Aliquots of 100 µl were collected at 5 intervals and the absorbance of the supernatant as measured at 410 nm.

Figure 2. Absorbance as a function of time for the whole cell esterase activity assay of Est119. After induced expression, E.coli BL21 (DE3) + Est119 or E.coli BL21 (DE3)ΔLpp +Est119, a native Lpp deficient stain, were washed and resuspended in PBS with 100µM pNOB with a cell density normalized to OD600=1.0. Samples were then incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Aliquots of 100 µl were collected at 5 intervals and the absorbance of the supernatant as measured at 410 nm.

Figure 1 and 2 show that for both substrates, the absorbance at 410 nm increases for treatment reactions with cells decorated with enzymes while the absorbance at 410 nm does not increase notably for control cases for reactions with no whole-cell catalyst. This is an indication that enzymes, which are anchored on the outer cell membrane, catalyze the cleavage of substrate into 4-nitrophenol. The rate of increase in absorbance at 410 nm is higher for pNOB substrate than NPO substrate. Furthermore, there is no significant difference between two different cell lines (BL21(DE3) and BL21(DE3) ΔLpp). This indicates the competition between lpp-OmpA-Enzyme and endogenous genes with Lpp secretion signal for secretion machinery in cells is likely to be not the rate-determining step.

Figure 3. Absorbance as a function of time for the whole cell esterase activity assay of Est119. After induced expression E.coli BL21 (DE3) + Est119 or E.coli BL21 (DE3) + Est119(ΔLpp), bacteria with a Lpp deficient plasmid, were washed, and resuspended in PBS with 100µM pNOB with a cell density normalized to OD600=1.0. Samples were then incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Aliquots of 100 µl were collected at 5 intervals and the absorbance of the supernatant as measured at 410 nm.

Figure 4. Absorbance as a function of time for the whole cell esterase activity assay of Est119. After induced expression, E.coli BL21 (DE3) + Est119 or E.coli BL21 (DE3) + Est119(ΔLpp), bacteria with an Lpp deficient plasmid, were washed and resuspended in PBS with 100µM NPO with a cell density normalized to OD600=1.0. Samples were then incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Aliquots of 100 µl were collected at 5 intervals and the absorbance of the supernatant as measured at 410 nm.

Figure 3 and 4 support a functional Lpp-OmpA-Est119 surface display mechanism. As observed before, the absorbance at 410 nm increases for treatment reactions with cells containing enzymes while the absorbance at 410 nm does not increase notably for control cases for reactions with no whole-cell catalyst. This indicates that our whole cell catalysis approach works. In all treatment cases, the absorbance at 410 nm for treatment cases containing cells with Lpp-OmpA-Est119 increases faster than cases containing cells with Enzymes. These observations suggest two conclusions:

1) Cells with Lpp-OmpA-Est119 have enzymes anchoring on the outer membrane and thus can readily access substrates, which enhance catalysis rate and result in a higher rate of increase in absorbance at 410 nm.

2) Cells with Enzymes without anchors can also catalyze cleavage of substrate, unlike our expectation. This suggests that substrates can cross cell membranes to reach enzymes. As cells are pellet before measurement, it also suggests that the product can then cross the membrane again and diffuse into the solution. This hypothesis is further supported by the general higher rate of increase of absorbance at 410 nm when pNOB is used instead of NPO. pNOB has a shorter carbon chain (4) in comparison to NPO (8) and thus, is expected to cross the membrane more readily.