Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K264001:Design"
(→References) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K264001 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K264001 short</partinfo> | ||
Line 16: | Line 15: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
+ | Estrem ST, Gaal T, Ross W, Gourse RL, Identification of an UP element consensus sequence for bacterial promoters, PNAS, (1998), 95, 9761-9766. |
Latest revision as of 01:55, 20 October 2009
Modular UP-element Design 2
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Design Notes
The observed UP elements were A-T rich. Therefore, the rational sequence modifications of Design 1 were made to preserve this feature. Nucleotides in Design 1 at positions -59, -58, -54, and -45 were changed from G to T, G to A, A to T, and C to G, respectively. A spacer, CT, is placed between the UP element and subsequent promoters to maintain proper alignment with RNAP.
Source
Rational redesign of BBa_K264000
References
Estrem ST, Gaal T, Ross W, Gourse RL, Identification of an UP element consensus sequence for bacterial promoters, PNAS, (1998), 95, 9761-9766.