Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4743030"
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
In Figure 1, we depict the initial exposure to normal conditions. In this scenario, when hydrogen sulfide levels are low, the translated SqrR protein (red) effectively represses the sqr promoter, resulting in the prevention of transcription for recombinases DRE or CRE ( gray) and the antitoxin (pink). Furthermore, the presence of terminator sequences labeled by rox or Lox sequences puts a halt to the transcription of the toxin. Consequently, under these conditions, the absence of both toxin and antitoxin prevents any cell death. | In Figure 1, we depict the initial exposure to normal conditions. In this scenario, when hydrogen sulfide levels are low, the translated SqrR protein (red) effectively represses the sqr promoter, resulting in the prevention of transcription for recombinases DRE or CRE ( gray) and the antitoxin (pink). Furthermore, the presence of terminator sequences labeled by rox or Lox sequences puts a halt to the transcription of the toxin. Consequently, under these conditions, the absence of both toxin and antitoxin prevents any cell death. | ||
− | <html><img style="width:800px" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4743/wiki/folder-for-parts/kill-switch-first-exposure-to-environment.png" </html> | + | <html><img style="width:800px" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4743/wiki/folder-for-parts/mechanism-of-kill-switch/kill-switch-first-exposure-to-environment-2.png" </html> |
<center>Figure 1: First exposure to the normal condition.</center> | <center>Figure 1: First exposure to the normal condition.</center> | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
In the second condition, as illustrated in Figure 4 and 5, when the organism is exposed to the gut environment characterized by the presence of hydrogen sulfide (depicted as one yellow dot with two blue dots), the suppressive effect of the SqrR protein (red) decreases. This reduction in suppression leads to the transcription of recombinase DRE or CRE (gray) and the antitoxin. The recombinase, in turn, targets the terminator sequence labeled by rox/Lox and cleaves it, enabling the transcription of the toxin(blue). However, it's important to note that the transcribed antitoxin (pink) counteracts the toxin, neutralizing its toxic activity. In conclusion, under these conditions, the presence of both toxin and antitoxin allows the cell to remain viable. | In the second condition, as illustrated in Figure 4 and 5, when the organism is exposed to the gut environment characterized by the presence of hydrogen sulfide (depicted as one yellow dot with two blue dots), the suppressive effect of the SqrR protein (red) decreases. This reduction in suppression leads to the transcription of recombinase DRE or CRE (gray) and the antitoxin. The recombinase, in turn, targets the terminator sequence labeled by rox/Lox and cleaves it, enabling the transcription of the toxin(blue). However, it's important to note that the transcribed antitoxin (pink) counteracts the toxin, neutralizing its toxic activity. In conclusion, under these conditions, the presence of both toxin and antitoxin allows the cell to remain viable. | ||
− | <html><img style="width:800px" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4743/wiki/folder-for-parts/kill-switch-gut-environment.png" </html> | + | <html><img style="width:800px" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4743/wiki/folder-for-parts/mechanism-of-kill-switch/kill-switch-gut-environment-2.png" </html> |
+ | |||
+ | <html><img style="width:800px" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4743/wiki/folder-for-parts/mechanism-of-kill-switch/kill-switch-gut-environment-2-2.png" </html> | ||
− | |||
<center>Figure 2-3: exposure to the gut environment</center> | <center>Figure 2-3: exposure to the gut environment</center> | ||
Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
In the third condition, depicted in Figure 4, we illustrate the organism's return to the normal environment, indicating its escape from the gut or excretion of feces. Under these circumstances, the SqrR suppressor (depicted in red) once again binds to the promoter, effectively inhibiting the transcription of the antitoxin. However, crucially, the terminator that normally halts toxin transcription is excised. This excision allows for the transcription of the toxin. In this scenario, the bacteria lose the protective antitoxin, leading to cell death as a consequence. | In the third condition, depicted in Figure 4, we illustrate the organism's return to the normal environment, indicating its escape from the gut or excretion of feces. Under these circumstances, the SqrR suppressor (depicted in red) once again binds to the promoter, effectively inhibiting the transcription of the antitoxin. However, crucially, the terminator that normally halts toxin transcription is excised. This excision allows for the transcription of the toxin. In this scenario, the bacteria lose the protective antitoxin, leading to cell death as a consequence. | ||
− | <html><img style="width:800px" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4743/wiki/folder-for-parts/kill-switch-second-exposure-environment.png" </html> | + | <html><img style="width:800px" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4743/wiki/folder-for-parts/mechanism-of-kill-switch/kill-switch-second-exposure-environment-2.png" </html> |
<center>Figure 4: Second exposure to the normal environment</center> | <center>Figure 4: Second exposure to the normal environment</center> | ||
Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
Then, We tailored our kill switch for Bacillus subtilis, selecting MazF as the toxin and MazE as the antitoxin, with DRE serving as our recombinase. Additionally, we carefully chose a promoter and terminator that are compatible with Bacillus subtilis, ensuring the effectiveness of our engineered system. | Then, We tailored our kill switch for Bacillus subtilis, selecting MazF as the toxin and MazE as the antitoxin, with DRE serving as our recombinase. Additionally, we carefully chose a promoter and terminator that are compatible with Bacillus subtilis, ensuring the effectiveness of our engineered system. | ||
− | <html><img style="width:800px" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4743/wiki/folder-for-parts/bacillus-subtilis-design.png" </html> | + | <html><img style="width:800px" src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4743/wiki/folder-for-parts/mechanism-of-kill-switch/bacillus-subtilis-design.png" </html> |
<center>Figure 5: kill switch of Bacillus Subtilis</center> | <center>Figure 5: kill switch of Bacillus Subtilis</center> | ||
Revision as of 06:00, 10 October 2023
Bacillus subtilis Hydrogen sulfide based kill switch
Kill switch’s mechanism
In Figure 1, we depict the initial exposure to normal conditions. In this scenario, when hydrogen sulfide levels are low, the translated SqrR protein (red) effectively represses the sqr promoter, resulting in the prevention of transcription for recombinases DRE or CRE ( gray) and the antitoxin (pink). Furthermore, the presence of terminator sequences labeled by rox or Lox sequences puts a halt to the transcription of the toxin. Consequently, under these conditions, the absence of both toxin and antitoxin prevents any cell death.
In the second condition, as illustrated in Figure 4 and 5, when the organism is exposed to the gut environment characterized by the presence of hydrogen sulfide (depicted as one yellow dot with two blue dots), the suppressive effect of the SqrR protein (red) decreases. This reduction in suppression leads to the transcription of recombinase DRE or CRE (gray) and the antitoxin. The recombinase, in turn, targets the terminator sequence labeled by rox/Lox and cleaves it, enabling the transcription of the toxin(blue). However, it's important to note that the transcribed antitoxin (pink) counteracts the toxin, neutralizing its toxic activity. In conclusion, under these conditions, the presence of both toxin and antitoxin allows the cell to remain viable.
In the third condition, depicted in Figure 4, we illustrate the organism's return to the normal environment, indicating its escape from the gut or excretion of feces. Under these circumstances, the SqrR suppressor (depicted in red) once again binds to the promoter, effectively inhibiting the transcription of the antitoxin. However, crucially, the terminator that normally halts toxin transcription is excised. This excision allows for the transcription of the toxin. In this scenario, the bacteria lose the protective antitoxin, leading to cell death as a consequence.
Then, We tailored our kill switch for Bacillus subtilis, selecting MazF as the toxin and MazE as the antitoxin, with DRE serving as our recombinase. Additionally, we carefully chose a promoter and terminator that are compatible with Bacillus subtilis, ensuring the effectiveness of our engineered system.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal NgoMIV site found at 464
Illegal AgeI site found at 1623 - 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal SapI.rc site found at 677