Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa I766555"
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
</tr> | </tr> | ||
<tr> | <tr> | ||
− | <td style = "border: 1px solid black"><i>pCYC1</i | + | <td style = "border: 1px solid black"><i>pCYC1</i></td><td style = "border: 1px solid black">sfGFP</td><td style = "border: 1px solid black">Restriction-ligation</td> |
</tr> | </tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
===Results=== | ===Results=== | ||
− | In this study, we assessed the level of gene expression driven by the | + | In this study, we assessed the level of gene expression driven by the promoter <i>pCYC1</i> by employing a fluorescent protein as a reporter. The promoter-containing constructs were integrated into the yeast genome, and the resulting reporter protein fluorescence was quantified in a 96-well plate. To establish a baseline of background fluorescence in the culture, we measured the fluorescence in a control strain, DOM90, which does not express any fluorescent proteins. |
− | Compared to the background fluorescence of DOM90, yeast strain with sfGFP under the control of <i> | + | Compared to the background fluorescence of DOM90, yeast strain with sfGFP under the control of <i>pCYC1</i> promoter displayed a 1.13-fold increase in sfGFP fluorescence intensity. |
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
<img alt="" | <img alt="" | ||
style="width: 800px" | style="width: 800px" | ||
− | src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4917/wiki/contribution/ | + | src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4917/wiki/contribution/cyca1.png"> |
− | <figcaption>Bars indicate the mean fluorescence intensity (expressed in arbitrary units, AU) measured in | + | <figcaption> Bars indicate the mean fluorescence intensity (expressed in arbitrary units, AU) measured in pCYC1-sfGFP strain or in DOM90 negative control strain. Error bars show standard deviation.</figcaption> |
</figure> | </figure> | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
− | In our study, we | + | In our study, we found that the <i>pCYC1</i> promoter is preferable when a weaker level of gene expression is needed. Expanding the quantitative information on yeast promoter activities facilitates the engineering of fine-tuned synthetic biology applications. |
===References:=== | ===References:=== | ||
− | + | Sherman, F. (2005). The importance of mutation, then and now: studies with yeast cytochrome c. Mutation Research, 589(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.001 | |
+ | Sherman, F., Stewart, J. W., Margoliash, E., Parker, J., & Campbell, W. (1966). The structural gene for yeast cytochrome C. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 55(6), 1498–1504. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.55.6.1498 | ||
Revision as of 00:52, 7 October 2023
pCyc (Medium) Promoter
Mid-expression level constitutive promoter in yeast
Team Estonia_TUIT 2023 characterization of BBa_I766555 (pCYC1)
The pCYC1 promoter is a constitutive promoter responsible for the expression of CYC1, which codes for the iso-1 variation of cytochrome c. Cytochrome c serves as an electron carrier protein and it is an essential component of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Cyc1, the protein encoded by CYC1, has a heme group, which aids in transferring electrons from respiratory complex III to respiratory complex IV. Additionally, it facilitates the final electron transfer to oxygen, a process catalyzed by complex IV, also known as cytochrome c oxidase. Cyc1 is localized in the inner mitochondrial membrane facing trans-membrane space. Iso-1 variation of cytochrome c constitutes 95% of the total cytochrome c content in cells that are growing aerobically (Sherman, 2005; Sherman et al., 1966). pCYC1 is also widely used in research as a weaker promoter compared to pADH1.
Plasmid formation
The promoters were PCR-amplified from the yeast genome using primers that contained SacI (forward primer) and BamHI (reverse primer) restriction sites in their 5’-overhangs. After PCR and restriction digestion, the DNA fragments containing the promoters were ligated into SacI/BamHI-restricted pRS304-based vector carrying sfGFP coding sequence and tCYC1 terminator.
Promoter | Reporter | Assembly methods |
pCYC1 | sfGFP | Restriction-ligation |
Yeast strain construction
Prior to yeast transformation, the integration plasmids were restricted with HindIII to linearise the plasmids for homologous recombination into the yeast genome TRP1 locus. The restricted plasmids were used to transform the S. cerevisiae DOM90 strain. Transformants were selected for Trp+ phenotype on tryptophan-dropout synthetic media (CSM-TRP) agar plates containing 2% glucose. All yeast strains generated and used for promoter characterization are listed in table:
Strain name | Genotype | Description |
DOM90 | MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+] | Background strain used for transformation and as a negative control |
I85 | DOM90 trp1::pRS304-pCYC1-sfGFP-tCYC1 | Strain with sfGFP under pCYC1 promoter, integrated into Trp1-1 locus |
sfGFP fluorescence measurements Prior to fluorescence measurements, yeast cells were cultivated in complete synthetic media (CSM) with 2% glucose until the cultures reached an optical density (OD600) in the range of 0.6 to 1. Subsequently, 200 μl of the cell suspension was transferred into the designated wells on 96-well plates. To measure sfGFP fluorescence, a BioTek Synergy Mx Microplate Reader equipped with a 458 nm wavelength LED for GFP excitation was utilized. The emitted fluorescence was measured at a wavelength of 528 nm.
Results
In this study, we assessed the level of gene expression driven by the promoter pCYC1 by employing a fluorescent protein as a reporter. The promoter-containing constructs were integrated into the yeast genome, and the resulting reporter protein fluorescence was quantified in a 96-well plate. To establish a baseline of background fluorescence in the culture, we measured the fluorescence in a control strain, DOM90, which does not express any fluorescent proteins. Compared to the background fluorescence of DOM90, yeast strain with sfGFP under the control of pCYC1 promoter displayed a 1.13-fold increase in sfGFP fluorescence intensity.
In our study, we found that the pCYC1 promoter is preferable when a weaker level of gene expression is needed. Expanding the quantitative information on yeast promoter activities facilitates the engineering of fine-tuned synthetic biology applications.
References:
Sherman, F. (2005). The importance of mutation, then and now: studies with yeast cytochrome c. Mutation Research, 589(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.001
Sherman, F., Stewart, J. W., Margoliash, E., Parker, J., & Campbell, W. (1966). The structural gene for yeast cytochrome C. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 55(6), 1498–1504. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.55.6.1498
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]