Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4937046"
18380928174 (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K4937046 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K4937046 short</partinfo> | ||
− | . | + | <p>This part belongs to our plasmid library, and the library is used to stably express SPE2 and tune the expression level of SPE3 and AtACL5 to fully use the spermidine substrate and examine the numerical relationship between spermidine and thermospermine.</p> |
+ | https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4937/wiki/part/34-1.png | ||
+ | <p>We firstly achieved all short single fragment by PCR from the genome of <i>S. cerevisiae</i> and plasmid (Figure 1). Then we connected all single expression device by fusion PCR (Figure 2). </p> | ||
+ | https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4937/wiki/part/34-2.png | ||
+ | <p style=" text-align: center;">Figure 1</p> | ||
+ | https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4937/wiki/part/34-3.png | ||
+ | <p style=" text-align: center;">Figure 2</p> | ||
+ | <p>However, the Gibson coloning results were not as expected. We performed the double enzyme digestion experiment and PCR to check whether the sequence of whole plasmids are right. And only one colony shows expected results(Figure 3), we guessed it may come from the unexpected similarity of homologous fragment. Due to time limited, we didn’t complete this part of work. However, we will keep on trying this design.</p> | ||
+ | https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4937/wiki/part/34-4.png | ||
+ | <p style=" text-align: center;">Figure 3</p> | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here |
Latest revision as of 11:44, 3 October 2023
tHXT7p-SPE3-PRM9t-PGK1p-AtACL5-CYC1t-TDH3p-SPE2-DIT1t
This part belongs to our plasmid library, and the library is used to stably express SPE2 and tune the expression level of SPE3 and AtACL5 to fully use the spermidine substrate and examine the numerical relationship between spermidine and thermospermine.
We firstly achieved all short single fragment by PCR from the genome of S. cerevisiae and plasmid (Figure 1). Then we connected all single expression device by fusion PCR (Figure 2).
Figure 1
Figure 2
However, the Gibson coloning results were not as expected. We performed the double enzyme digestion experiment and PCR to check whether the sequence of whole plasmids are right. And only one colony shows expected results(Figure 3), we guessed it may come from the unexpected similarity of homologous fragment. Due to time limited, we didn’t complete this part of work. However, we will keep on trying this design.
Figure 3
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 1325
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal XhoI site found at 3568
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]