Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K4165173"
Line 40: Line 40:
  
 
===WetLab Results===
 
===WetLab Results===
−
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> Comparison between the mathematical model of dry lab and the wet lab results </p>
+
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> Comparison between the mathematical model of dry lab and the wet lab results of GST COH WWW using sonicator </p>
 
<html>
 
<html>
 
<p><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4165/wiki/data-analysis/tir-wet-expression/coh-www-son.jpg" style="margin-left:200px;" alt="" width="500" /></p>
 
<p><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4165/wiki/data-analysis/tir-wet-expression/coh-www-son.jpg" style="margin-left:200px;" alt="" width="500" /></p>
 
</html>
 
</html>
 
Figure 2. This graph shows that the mathematical model of dry lab and the wet lab results of GST COH WWW using sonicator correlate with each other
 
Figure 2. This graph shows that the mathematical model of dry lab and the wet lab results of GST COH WWW using sonicator correlate with each other
 +
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> Comparison between the mathematical model of dry lab and the wet lab results of GST COH WWW using chemical lysis </p>
 +
 +
<html>
 +
<p><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4165/wiki/data-analysis/tir-wet-expression/coh2-www-chem.jpg" style="margin-left:200px;" alt="" width="500" /></p>
 +
</html>
 +
Figure 3. This Graph shows that the mathematical model of dry lab and the results of wet lab of GST COH WWW using chemical lysis don't correlate with each other as there is a great difference between the results
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
  
  

Revision as of 16:46, 11 October 2022


Biobrick GST - CoH2 - Linker - WWW

This composite part consists of T7 promoter (BBa_K3633015), lac operator (BBa_K4165062), RBS 4 (BBa_K4165264), GST (BBa_K4165070), CoH2 (BBa_K4165003), GGGGSx3 (BBa_K4165068), WWW (BBa_K4165007), and T7 terminator (BBa_K731721).

Source

Synthesized

Usage and Biology

The protac in our snitch system, it is responsible for connecting the target protein (tau) to the tTrim21 which binds to E2 conjugating enzymes and put tau and ubiquitin in proximity to each other resulting in ubiquitination of the tau at lysine residue, after ubiquitination the tau will be degraded by 26S proteosome.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 45
    Illegal SapI.rc site found at 189

Dry Lab

Modeling

From 3 models out of 16 Models modeled in 4 software, 1 Model ranked best according to its Q_Mean values 4 and 6. The best Model has values of : score 5 out of 6 , C-Beta deviation = 1 , clash score = 3.08 , molprobitey = 1.35 , Ramachandran favored = 96.31, Ramachandran outlier = 0.79 , Q Mean_4 = -0.01 , Q_Mean_6 = -0.29. 


                          Figure 1. The 3D structure of the COH-Linker-WWW model visualized by Pymol.

Mathematical modeling

Transcription rate and translation rate under T7 promotor

the mathematical modeling was based on our code for the calculation of transcription and translation (you can find it in the code section) beside with the estimated results from the wet lab. 

                 Figure 1. this figure shows the results from the transcription and translation code showing the 
                     variation of mRNA and protein concentrations with time compared with the wet lab results.

WetLab Results

Comparison between the mathematical model of dry lab and the wet lab results of GST COH WWW using sonicator

Figure 2. This graph shows that the mathematical model of dry lab and the wet lab results of GST COH WWW using sonicator correlate with each other

Comparison between the mathematical model of dry lab and the wet lab results of GST COH WWW using chemical lysis

Figure 3. This Graph shows that the mathematical model of dry lab and the results of wet lab of GST COH WWW using chemical lysis don't correlate with each other as there is a great difference between the results