Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3396000"
Line 138: Line 138:
  
  
−
 
+
===WetLab Results===
 +
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> Transformation of His Doc in BL-21 using pGS-21a vector </p>
 +
<html>
 +
<p><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4165/wiki/parts-registry/wetlab-results/his-doc-pgs.jpg" style="margin-left:200px;" alt="" width="500" /></p>
 +
</html>
 +
                                    Figure 7. Transformed plate of His Doc + pGS-21a
 +
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> Transformation of His Doc in DH-5 alpha using pJET vector </p>
 +
<html>
 +
<p><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4165/wiki/parts-registry/wetlab-results/his-doc-pjet.jpg" style="margin-left:200px;" alt="" width="500" /></p>
 +
</html>
 +
                                    Figure 8. Transformed plate of His Doc + pJET
 +
<p style=" font-weight: bold; font-size:14px;"> Comparison between chemical lysis and sonication for His DOC </p>
 +
<html>
 +
<p><img src="https://static.igem.wiki/teams/4165/wiki/data-analysis/sonication-or-chemical/sonication-or-chemical/his-docs.jpg" style="margin-left:200px;" alt="" width="500" /></p>
 +
</html>
 +
Figure 9. This graph shows the difference between chemical lysis and sonication for His DOC, after we had the results we optimized our protocol to use chemical lysis for His DOC
 
===Reference===
 
===Reference===
 
[1] BARAK Y, HANDELSMAN T, NAKAR D, et al. Matching fusion protein systems for affinity analysis of two interacting families of proteins: the cohesin-dockerin interaction [J]. J Mol Recognit, 2005, 18(6): 491-501.
 
[1] BARAK Y, HANDELSMAN T, NAKAR D, et al. Matching fusion protein systems for affinity analysis of two interacting families of proteins: the cohesin-dockerin interaction [J]. J Mol Recognit, 2005, 18(6): 491-501.

Revision as of 16:07, 11 October 2022


DocS

The Coch2 module binds DocS (BBa_K3396000) modules constitutively.

Usage and Biology

The DocS[1] module comes from The C. thermocellum scaffoldin and it could recognize and bind tightly to complementary Coh2 modules. The Coh2–DocS pair represents the interaction between two complementary families of protein modules that exhibit divergent specificities and affinities, ranging from one of the highest known affinity constants between two proteins to relatively low-affinity interactions.


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Improvement by CU_Egypt team 2022


From literature we found that the yield of expression of Docs is very low so we decided to test it with different tags GST and His to see their effects on its stability and expression yield. Also, we optimized the sequence to be expressed in E-coli. in addition, there is no characterization for Docs on the registry so we expressed and characterized it by different methods such as Agarose gel electrophoresis, SDS PAGE, transformation efficiency, affinity chromatography, and Bradford assay. it's proved by wet lab results that the expression yield of Docs has raised with tagging by GST.

1. Dry Lab

1.1. Modeling

Docs has been tagged with GST and His for purification and increasing the yield by the GST tag. then the model designed by several tools to get the best model.

GST-Docs 

                 Figure 1.: Predicted 3D structure of GST-Docs designed by RosettaFold tool.



                                Table 1.: QA scores by SWISS model tool of GST-Docs structure.



His-Docs 

                      Figure 2.: Predicted 3D structure of His-Docs designed by TRrosetta tool.



                              Table 2.: QA scores by SWISS model tool of His-Docs structure.



1.2. Docking

Tagged Docs with GST and His has been docked with Coh2 tagged with GST and His by different tools to get the best model. Best docked structures were retrieved from ClusPro and Galaxy webservers according to our ranking code.


GST-Docs VS His-Coh by Cluspro 


                 Figure 3.: Docked structure of GST-Docs VS His-Coh2 designed by Cluspro.


GST-Docs VS His-Coh2 by Galaxy 


                 Figure 4.: Docked structure of GST-Docs VS His-Coh2 designed by Galaxy.


His-Docs VS GST-Coh by ClusPro 


                 Figure 5.: Docked structure of His-Docs VS GST-Coh2 designed by ClusPro.


His-Docs VS GST-Coh2 by Galaxy 


                 Figure 6.: Docked structure of His-Docs VS GST-Coh2 designed by Galaxy.


Binding energies of Docs VS Coh2 


             Table 3.: Binding energies of Docs VS Coh2 tagged with GST and His designed by Galaxy and ClusPro.


All of docking results were ranked using our code for calculating the binding affinity.



1.3. Additional Dry Lab characterization

pI: 5.30

M.Wt.: 16751.19 Da



WetLab Results

Transformation of His Doc in BL-21 using pGS-21a vector 

                                   Figure 7. Transformed plate of His Doc + pGS-21a

Transformation of His Doc in DH-5 alpha using pJET vector 

                                    Figure 8. Transformed plate of His Doc + pJET

Comparison between chemical lysis and sonication for His DOC

Figure 9. This graph shows the difference between chemical lysis and sonication for His DOC, after we had the results we optimized our protocol to use chemical lysis for His DOC

Reference

[1] BARAK Y, HANDELSMAN T, NAKAR D, et al. Matching fusion protein systems for affinity analysis of two interacting families of proteins: the cohesin-dockerin interaction [J]. J Mol Recognit, 2005, 18(6): 491-501.

[2] Kazutaka Sakka, Yuka Sugihara, Sadanari Jindou, Makiko Sakka, Minoru Inagaki, Kazuo Sakka, Tetsuya Kimura, Analysis of cohesin–dockerin interactions using mutant dockerin proteins, FEMS Microbiology Letters, Volume 314, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages 75–80, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02146.x

[3] Lawrie, J., Song, X., Niu, W., & Guo, J. (2018). A high throughput approach for the generation of orthogonally interacting protein pairs. Scientific Reports, 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19281-6