Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa J428100"
Alejovigno (Talk | contribs) |
Alejovigno (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Non-fluorescent negative control for InterLab studies 2022. | Non-fluorescent negative control for InterLab studies 2022. | ||
It uses the same elements as the fluorescent constructs but expresses a non-fluorescent protein (LuxR). | It uses the same elements as the fluorescent constructs but expresses a non-fluorescent protein (LuxR). | ||
− | It includes a region upstream of the promoter to insulate transcription, a promoter (J23106), a RiboJ to insulate translation, the B0032 RBS, the CDS for the LuxR protein, and an efficient transcriptional terminator ( | + | It includes a region upstream of the promoter to insulate transcription, a promoter (J23106), a RiboJ to insulate translation, the B0032 RBS, the CDS for the LuxR protein, and an efficient transcriptional terminator (rnpB_T1). |
It imposes the same burden on the bacteria for a more fair growth comparison between the different devices. | It imposes the same burden on the bacteria for a more fair growth comparison between the different devices. | ||
Revision as of 20:45, 8 June 2022
Interlab_NegC
Non-fluorescent negative control for InterLab studies 2022.
It uses the same elements as the fluorescent constructs but expresses a non-fluorescent protein (LuxR).
It includes a region upstream of the promoter to insulate transcription, a promoter (J23106), a RiboJ to insulate translation, the B0032 RBS, the CDS for the LuxR protein, and an efficient transcriptional terminator (rnpB_T1).
It imposes the same burden on the bacteria for a more fair growth comparison between the different devices.
Interlab_2022_DoubleConstructs and Interlab_2022_ThreeColors
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 71
Illegal NheI site found at 94 - 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]