Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3725022:Experience"

Latest revision as of 22:44, 21 October 2021

Experience
After concluding that there was not statistically significant fluorescence in dual-plasmid cells with T7 Fusarium Trigger (Part BBa_K3725070) and the original Fusarium Toehold w/ GFP Reporter (Part BBa_K3725020), Lambert iGEM decided to use a redesigned toehold switch sequence, Improved Fusarium Toehold w/ GFP Reporter (Part BBa_K3725022), obtained from NUPACK. Consequently, another dual-plasmid transformation was performed using the new switch sequence and the trigger sequence, and fluorescence was measured. The fluorescence per optical density unit measurement of cells transformed with both plasmids was greater and had a statistically significant difference in comparison to the measurements of cells transformed with only the toehold part and pUC19 plasmid.

T--Lambert GA--PhytoIPTGFluoresenceData.jpeg

Figure 2. Mean fluorescence/OD of IPTG-induced Fusarium pair 2 dual plasmid transformation compared to toehold and pUC19 with SEM error bars. Ran at gain of 40.

Applications of BBa_K3725022

User Reviews

UNIQab5306d72e004422-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQab5306d72e004422-partinfo-00000001-QINU

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 <center>[[File:T--Lambert GA--PhytoIPTGFluoresenceData.jpeg|500px]]</center>
 <br>
-<center><I>Figure 2: This graph compares the mean fluorescence per optical density values of the Fusarium oxyspora toehold switch, positive control (pUC19), and the dual plasmid. The toehold switch and positive control have very low fluorescence per optical density values, whereas the dual plasmid has a higher fluorescence per optical density value, that is significantly different from the other two groups.</I></center>
+<center><I>Figure 2. Mean fluorescence/OD of IPTG-induced Fusarium pair 2 dual plasmid transformation compared to toehold and pUC19 with SEM error bars. Ran at gain of 40.</I></center>
 <br>
 ===Applications of BBa_K3725022===