Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3939111"

Line 14: Line 14:
 
<b><h3>Measurement of nfGFP half-life</h3></b>
 
<b><h3>Measurement of nfGFP half-life</h3></b>
 
<h4>1. Characterization part design:</h4>
 
<h4>1. Characterization part design:</h4>
<p>Ubiquitin is a small protein found in all eukaryotes whose primary function is to label a protein to be quickly recognized and degraded by the proteasome in the cell. We added a ubiquitin tag before the GFP structural gene, predicting that this would result in faster recognition and degradation of the expressed ubiquitin-tagged-GFP fusion protein by the ubiquitin degradation mechanism. To test our hypothesis, we designed the following parts and experiments. </p><br>
+
<p>Ubiquitin is a small protein founded in all eukaryotes whose primary function is to label a protein to be quickly recognized and degraded by the proteasome in the cell. We added a ubiquitin tag before the GFP structural gene, predicting that this would result in faster recognition and degradation of the expressed ubiquitin-tagged-GFP fusion protein by the ubiquitin degradation mechanism [1]. To test our hypothesis, we designed the following parts and experiments. </p><br>
[[File:T--Tianjin--imp1.png|400px|thumb|right|Fig.1 nfGFP Schematic (plasmid vector 、Pgal、Ubiquitin tag、nfGFP、terminator)]]
+
[[File:T--Tianjin--Parts06.png|400px|thumb|center|<i>Figure 1. The sketch map of the characterization plasmid of nfGFP</i>]]
<p>To avoid misunderstanding, two nfGFP parts in the project are different. When measuring the degradation rate of nfGFP, we used the inducible promoter Pgal and expressed it on a plasmid vector. In contrast, when verifying chromosome-free cell formation with nfGFP, the promoter was the frequently expressed promoter TDH3, and we integrated it on the chromosome for expression by homologous recombination.</p>
+
<p>To avoid misunderstanding, we show the diffenences between two nfGFP parts in our project. When measuring the degradation rate of nfGFP, we used the inducible promoter Pgal and expressed it on a plasmid vector. In contrast, when verifying chromosome-free cell formation with nfGFP, the promoter is TDH3 which can express frequently, and we integrated it on the chromosome for expression by homologous recombination.</p>
  
 
<h4>2. Experiment design:</h4>
 
<h4>2. Experiment design:</h4>
Control group: S. Cerevisiae with a normal GFP expression plasmid<br>
+
Control group: S. Cerevisiae<br>
Experiment design:<br>
+
Experimental material: S. Cerevisiae with a nfGFP expression plasmid<br>
Control group: S. Cerevisiae with a regular GFP expression plasmid<br>
+
Before the induction, the cells were cultured and enriched in the medium for 15 hours. We measured the OD600 values and the nfGFP fluorescence values. When the nfGFP fluorescence signals reached a steady value, we stopped inducing, then changed cells to standard medium. Considering the end of induction as time zero, we recorded the changes of OD600 and nfGFP fluorescence signals every two hours. Due to the shutdown of nfGFP expression in the cell, the cells can no longer produce reporter proteins, so the change in fluorescence signal intensity since then roughly reflects the degradation rate of nfGFP. By measuring the nfGFP fluorescence values, we plotted the degradation curves of nfGFP and calculated the half-life of nfGFP.<br>
Experimental group: S. Cerevisiae with an nfGFP expression plasmid<br>
+
 
+
Before the induction, the cells in the experimental group were cultured and enriched in the medium for 15 hours. Considering the start of induction as time zero, we measured the OD600 values and nfGFP fluorescence intensity value of the cells every two hours. When the nfGFP fluorescence signals of the experimental groups reached a steady value, we stopped the induction, then changed to standard medium, and recorded the changes of OD600 and GFP fluorescence signals every two hours. Due to the shutdown of GFP expression in the cell, the cell can no longer produce reporter protein, so the change in fluorescence signal intensity since then roughly reflects the rate of degradation of both parts. By measuring the OD600 values and nfGFP fluorescence values, we plotted the degradation curves of the two parts and compared them. <br>
+
  
 
<h4>3. Experiment operation</h4><br>
 
<h4>3. Experiment operation</h4><br>
(1) Enrichment and induction: Due to a large amount of culture medium required for subsequent measurements, we used shake flasks with 25 ml of induction medium to minimize the effect of changes in culture medium volume. <br>
+
(1) Enrichment and induction: Due to a large amount of culture medium required for subsequent measurements, we used shake flasks with 25 ml of induction medium to minimize the effect of the volume changes of the culture medium.<br>
(2) Measurement of OD600: We used a UV spectrophotometer to measure OD600. To ensure data reliability, we unified the dilution multipliers while ensuring that the values are between 0.1-1.0 and as far as possible between 0.2-0.8. <br>
+
(2) Measurement of OD600: We used a UV spectrophotometry to measure OD600. To ensure data reliability, we unified the dilution multipliers while ensuring that the values are between 0.1-1.0 and as far as possible between 0.2-0.8.<br>
(3) Measurement of fluorescence value: We use an enzyme-labeled instrument to measure the nfGFP fluorescence value. After the OD600 measurement, wash off the culture medium and resuspend the cells with sterile water. Add 200 μl of the suspension to be measured to each well of the plate of the enzyme-labeled instrument. We set blank reference (water), control, and experimental groups in three parallel groups when adding samples. The excitation/emission light wavelength of nfGFP in the enzyme-labeled instrument was 488/535 nm. <br>
+
(3) Measurement of fluorescence value: We use a Microplate Reader to measure the nfGFP fluorescence value. After the OD600 measurement, we wash off the culture medium and resuspend the cells with sterile water. Then, add 200 μl of the suspension to be measured to each well of the 96 well microtiter plate. We set blank reference (water), control groups and experimental groups in three parallel groups when adding samples. The excitation/emission light wavelength of nfGFP in the Microplate Reader was 488/535 nm.<br>
  
 
<h4>4. How we analyze and process data</h4>
 
<h4>4. How we analyze and process data</h4>
 +
Since the sample is diluted, the fluorescence intensity is equal to the measured fluorescence intensity multiplied by the dilution factor. Besides, the measured fluorescence intensity value should also subtract the blank value. In summary, the formula for calculating the nfGFP fluorescence intensity should be as follows.<br>
 +
<p style="text-align:center !important;">V^'=ω*(V-C) </p>
 +
V^':the true fluorescence intensity of nfGFP/200μl sample<br>
 +
V: the measured value of nfGFP fluorescence signal/200μl sample<br>
 +
C: blank reference(water)<br>
 +
ω: the dilution factor of sample<br>
 +
The values of the three parallel groups of samples were averaged and plotted, the calculated data are shown in the figure.We use the following formula to fit the measured value and calculate the half-life value.<br>
  
The values of the three parallel groups of samples were averaged and plotted. <br>
+
<p style="text-align:center !important;">N=N_0*e^(-kt) </p>
In our experiments, we found that the fluorescence signal has a linear relationship with OD600 when the OD600 is less than 1, which means we should control the OD600 of the sample for measuring the fluorescence value to be less than 0.8. <br>
+
<p style="text-align:center !important;">τ=ln2/k </p>
Since the sample is diluted, the fluorescence intensity is equal to the measured fluorescence intensity multiplied by the dilution factor.Besides, the measured fluorescence intensity value should also subtract the blank value.In summary, the formula for calculating the nfGFP fluorescence intensity should be<br><br>
+
N: fluorescence measurement over time<br>
<p style="text-align:center !important;">V^'=ω*(V-C) </p>
+
N_0: initial fluorescence value<br>
 +
τ: half life value<br>
  
V^':the fluorescence intensity of nfGFP<br>
+
[[File:T--Tianjin--imp2.png|400px|thumb|center| <i>Figure 2. The degradation curve of nfGFP</i>]]
V: the measured value of nfGFP fluorescence signal in experimental group<br>
+
<h4>5. Results analysis<h4>
C: blank reference<br>
+
From the results, it is observed that: When we stop inducing, the nfGFP signal decreased fast, indicating that nfGFP was rapidly degraded in the cells after the gene was no longer expressed.<br>
ω:sample dilution factor<br>
+
The data show that the half-life of nfGFP is around 7.558h, which is significantly reduced compared to the half-life of GFP(33h), confirming the validity of our design.<br>
  
The corrected values are shown in the figure:<br>
+
<h4>6.Reference<h4>
[[File:T--Tianjin--imp2.png|400px|thumb|right| Fig.2 the corrected data of degradation curve
+
[1] John R. Houser, Eintou Ford, Sudeshna M. Chatterjea. (2012). An improved short‐lived fluorescent protein transcriptional reporter for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast(12), 519-530.<br>
]]
+
After cessation of induction, the nfGFP signal decreased to the level when the expression was not induced, indicating that nfGFP was rapidly degraded in the cells after the nfGFP gene was no longer expressed. The data show that the half-life of nfGFP is around 7.558h, which is significantly reduced compared to the half-life time of GFP on average, confirming the validity of our design.
+
  
  

Revision as of 06:02, 21 October 2021


Fast degrading GFP

The ubiquitin tag is fused to the N-terminal of the GFP to make the GFP a rapidly degrading GFP

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BamHI site found at 277
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 25
    Illegal AgeI site found at 466
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]

We improved the GFP part. In the beginning, we directly took the GFP part into practice, while later, it is observed that GFP has a relatively long half-life, which is not conducive to further measurement. This section we will illustrate how we test our improvel designs correspondingly, showing the reasonability in the process and the reliability of the results.

Measurement of nfGFP half-life

1. Characterization part design:

Ubiquitin is a small protein founded in all eukaryotes whose primary function is to label a protein to be quickly recognized and degraded by the proteasome in the cell. We added a ubiquitin tag before the GFP structural gene, predicting that this would result in faster recognition and degradation of the expressed ubiquitin-tagged-GFP fusion protein by the ubiquitin degradation mechanism [1]. To test our hypothesis, we designed the following parts and experiments.


Figure 1. The sketch map of the characterization plasmid of nfGFP

To avoid misunderstanding, we show the diffenences between two nfGFP parts in our project. When measuring the degradation rate of nfGFP, we used the inducible promoter Pgal and expressed it on a plasmid vector. In contrast, when verifying chromosome-free cell formation with nfGFP, the promoter is TDH3 which can express frequently, and we integrated it on the chromosome for expression by homologous recombination.

2. Experiment design:

Control group: S. Cerevisiae
Experimental material: S. Cerevisiae with a nfGFP expression plasmid
Before the induction, the cells were cultured and enriched in the medium for 15 hours. We measured the OD600 values and the nfGFP fluorescence values. When the nfGFP fluorescence signals reached a steady value, we stopped inducing, then changed cells to standard medium. Considering the end of induction as time zero, we recorded the changes of OD600 and nfGFP fluorescence signals every two hours. Due to the shutdown of nfGFP expression in the cell, the cells can no longer produce reporter proteins, so the change in fluorescence signal intensity since then roughly reflects the degradation rate of nfGFP. By measuring the nfGFP fluorescence values, we plotted the degradation curves of nfGFP and calculated the half-life of nfGFP.

3. Experiment operation


(1) Enrichment and induction: Due to a large amount of culture medium required for subsequent measurements, we used shake flasks with 25 ml of induction medium to minimize the effect of the volume changes of the culture medium.
(2) Measurement of OD600: We used a UV spectrophotometry to measure OD600. To ensure data reliability, we unified the dilution multipliers while ensuring that the values are between 0.1-1.0 and as far as possible between 0.2-0.8.
(3) Measurement of fluorescence value: We use a Microplate Reader to measure the nfGFP fluorescence value. After the OD600 measurement, we wash off the culture medium and resuspend the cells with sterile water. Then, add 200 μl of the suspension to be measured to each well of the 96 well microtiter plate. We set blank reference (water), control groups and experimental groups in three parallel groups when adding samples. The excitation/emission light wavelength of nfGFP in the Microplate Reader was 488/535 nm.

4. How we analyze and process data

Since the sample is diluted, the fluorescence intensity is equal to the measured fluorescence intensity multiplied by the dilution factor. Besides, the measured fluorescence intensity value should also subtract the blank value. In summary, the formula for calculating the nfGFP fluorescence intensity should be as follows.

V^'=ω*(V-C)

V^':the true fluorescence intensity of nfGFP/200μl sample
V: the measured value of nfGFP fluorescence signal/200μl sample
C: blank reference(water)
ω: the dilution factor of sample
The values of the three parallel groups of samples were averaged and plotted, the calculated data are shown in the figure.We use the following formula to fit the measured value and calculate the half-life value.

N=N_0*e^(-kt)

τ=ln2/k

N: fluorescence measurement over time
N_0: initial fluorescence value
τ: half life value

Figure 2. The degradation curve of nfGFP

5. Results analysis<h4> From the results, it is observed that: When we stop inducing, the nfGFP signal decreased fast, indicating that nfGFP was rapidly degraded in the cells after the gene was no longer expressed.
The data show that the half-life of nfGFP is around 7.558h, which is significantly reduced compared to the half-life of GFP(33h), confirming the validity of our design.
<h4>6.Reference<h4> [1] John R. Houser, Eintou Ford, Sudeshna M. Chatterjea. (2012). An improved short‐lived fluorescent protein transcriptional reporter for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast(12), 519-530.