Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3431001"

Line 46: Line 46:
 
The ON/OFF ratio with miR-21 is 0.96, which suggested the leakage problem. The regulatory function of the pp21_B toehold switch was not good enough. Thus, pp21_B toehold switch-regulated invertase cannot be well controlled by the miR-21.
 
The ON/OFF ratio with miR-21 is 0.96, which suggested the leakage problem. The regulatory function of the pp21_B toehold switch was not good enough. Thus, pp21_B toehold switch-regulated invertase cannot be well controlled by the miR-21.
  
 +
===Information contributed by City of London UK (2021)===
 +
[[File:ToeholdTools.png|x200px|center]]
  
 +
This toehold switch was characterized <i>in silico</i> using the ToeholdTools project that our team developed.
 +
See https://github.com/lkn849/thtools for more information.
 +
 +
Metadata:
 +
*'''Group:''' City of London UK 2021
 +
*'''Author:''' Lucas Ng
 +
*'''Summary:''' Used our software ToeholdTools to investigate the target miRNA specificity and activation of this part.
 +
 +
Raw data:
 +
*[[Media:BBa_K3431001_thtest.txt]]
 +
*[[Media:BBa_K3431001_crt.txt]]
 +
 +
This contribution was autogenerated by the script https://github.com/lkn849/thtools/registry/contrib.py
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
This switch was designed to detect the miRNA hsa-miR-21-5p at a temperature of 37.
 +
We tested it against every <i>Homo sapiens</i> RNA in miRBase and our analysis shows that it is best used to detect hsa-miR-4729.
 +
 +
With hsa-miR-4729 at 37°C, the switch has a specificity of 11 ± Infinity % and an activation of 0.2 ± 0.5 %.
 +
These values represent 95% confidence limits (z=1.96).
 +
 +
The temperature&ndash;activation&ndash;specificity relationship is shown here:
 +
 +
[[File:BBa_K3431001_crt.png|500px|center]]
 +
 +
Error bars represent the standard error (SE).
 +
The line of best fit was calculated using a univariate cubic spline weighted inverse to each point's SE.
 +
 +
'''Caveats:'''
 +
*As per the above, we cannot confirm that this switch detects the desired RNA sequence.
 +
 +
We do not recommend this part for future usage.
 
===References===
 
===References===
 
1. Green, A. A., Silver, P. A., Collins, J. J., & Yin, P. (2014). Toehold switches: de-novo-designed regulators of gene expression. Cell, 159(4), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.002
 
1. Green, A. A., Silver, P. A., Collins, J. J., & Yin, P. (2014). Toehold switches: de-novo-designed regulators of gene expression. Cell, 159(4), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.002

Revision as of 08:02, 5 October 2021


pp21_B Toehold Switch for miR-21 Detection

Introduction

pp21_B toehold switch is a regulatory part for the downstream reporter gene. With this part, the protein expression can be controlled by the miR-21. The sequence of the toehold switch can be separated into the following 5 regions from its 5' end: TBS (trigger binding site), stem region, loop region with RBS (ribosome binding site), complimentary stem region with a start codon, and linker. Upon binding with miR-21, its hairpin structure can be opened up and the ribosomes can bind with its RBS (ribosome binding site), triggering the translation of the downstream reporter.

Design

The design of the toehold switch was mainly based on the previous research[1][2][3][4][5][6]. For the pp21_B toehold switch, we adopted the loop and the linker structure from Wang et al., 2019[7]. Using NUPACK analysis and Vienna binding models, we designed the sequence of the toehold switch. (See our model page: https://2020.igem.org/Team:CSMU_Taiwan/Model )


Figure 1. NUPACK analysis result
Figure. 2. ViennaRNA Package result

















Characterization using invertase

The 2020 iGEM CSMU-Taiwan characterized the toehold switch with invertase (BBa_K3431000) reporter protein. The plasmid would be transcribed and translated with the protein synthesis kit at 37℃ for 2 hours. We would then add 5μl of 0.5M sucrose and measured the glucose concentration with RightestTM GS550 glucose meter after 30 minutes. In our experiments, the ON state refers to the conditions with miRNA triggers; while the OFF state means that there was no miRNA in the environment. We calculated the ON/OFF ratio of the toehold switch, which is defined as “the glucose concentration of the ON state/ the glucose concentration of the OFF state”.

Figure. 3. The glucose productions of the pp21_B toehold switch-regulated invertase in different states. The blue bar refers to the OFF state (not added with miRNA). The green bar refers to the ON state (added with miR-21 trigger). The yellow bar refers to the state with non-related RNAs (added with miR-191). The pink bar refers to the state with non-related RNAs (added with miR-223).

Results
The ON/OFF ratio with miR-21 is 0.96, which suggested the leakage problem. The regulatory function of the pp21_B toehold switch was not good enough. Thus, pp21_B toehold switch-regulated invertase cannot be well controlled by the miR-21.

Information contributed by City of London UK (2021)

ToeholdTools.png

This toehold switch was characterized in silico using the ToeholdTools project that our team developed. See https://github.com/lkn849/thtools for more information.

Metadata:

  • Group: City of London UK 2021
  • Author: Lucas Ng
  • Summary: Used our software ToeholdTools to investigate the target miRNA specificity and activation of this part.

Raw data:

This contribution was autogenerated by the script https://github.com/lkn849/thtools/registry/contrib.py


This switch was designed to detect the miRNA hsa-miR-21-5p at a temperature of 37. We tested it against every Homo sapiens RNA in miRBase and our analysis shows that it is best used to detect hsa-miR-4729.

With hsa-miR-4729 at 37°C, the switch has a specificity of 11 ± Infinity % and an activation of 0.2 ± 0.5 %. These values represent 95% confidence limits (z=1.96).

The temperature–activation–specificity relationship is shown here:

Error creating thumbnail: Invalid thumbnail parameters

Error bars represent the standard error (SE). The line of best fit was calculated using a univariate cubic spline weighted inverse to each point's SE.

Caveats:

  • As per the above, we cannot confirm that this switch detects the desired RNA sequence.

We do not recommend this part for future usage.

References

1. Green, A. A., Silver, P. A., Collins, J. J., & Yin, P. (2014). Toehold switches: de-novo-designed regulators of gene expression. Cell, 159(4), 925–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.002

2. Green, A. A., Kim, J., Ma, D., Silver, P. A., Collins, J. J., & Yin, P. (2017). Complex cellular logic computation using ribocomputing devices. Nature, 548(7665), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23271

3. Pardee, K., Green, A. A., Takahashi, M. K., Braff, D., Lambert, G., Lee, J. W., Ferrante, T., Ma, D., Donghia, N., Fan, M., Daringer, N. M., Bosch, I., Dudley, D. M., O'Connor, D. H., Gehrke, L., & Collins, J. J. (2016). Rapid, Low-Cost Detection of Zika Virus Using Programmable Biomolecular Components. Cell, 165(5), 1255–1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.059

4. Chappell, J., Westbrook, A., Verosloff, M., & Lucks, J. B. (2017). Computational design of small transcription activating RNAs for versatile and dynamic gene regulation. Nature communications, 8(1), 1051. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01082-6

5. Sadat Mousavi, P., Smith, S. J., Chen, J. B., Karlikow, M., Tinafar, A., Robinson, C., Liu, W., Ma, D., Green, A. A., Kelley, S. O., & Pardee, K. (2020). A multiplexed, electrochemical interface for gene-circuit-based sensors. Nature chemistry, 12(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-019-0366-y

6. Hong, F., Ma, D., Wu, K., Mina, L. A., Luiten, R. C., Liu, Y., Yan, H., & Green, A. A. (2020). Precise and Programmable Detection of Mutations Using Ultraspecific Riboregulators. Cell, 180(5), 1018–1032.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.011

7. Shue Wang, Nicholas J Emery, Allen P Liu. A Novel Synthetic Toehold Switch for microRNA Detection in Mammalian Cells. ACS Synthetic Biology 2019; 8 (5): 1079-1088.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]