Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3503007"
Philip Cheng (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
<h2>Fire retardant test of K3503007</h2> | <h2>Fire retardant test of K3503007</h2> | ||
− | <p>The test subject was in the size of bed sheet in 300*130mm and the average Moisture content% is 13.55%-14.37%. As demonstrated on Fig 2, all of our engineered flame retardant displayed | + | <p>The test subject was in the size of bed sheet in 300*130mm and the average Moisture content% is 13.55%-14.37%. As demonstrated on Fig 2, all of our engineered flame retardant displayed an improvement compared with the water control.</p> |
<img src="https://2020.igem.org/wiki/images/9/9c/T--Puiching_Macau--bedsheet_chart.png"> | <img src="https://2020.igem.org/wiki/images/9/9c/T--Puiching_Macau--bedsheet_chart.png"> | ||
<div class="legend">Figure 2. Vertical Burning Test using bedsheet. | <div class="legend">Figure 2. Vertical Burning Test using bedsheet. | ||
<img src="https://2020.igem.org/wiki/images/2/2e/T--Puiching_Macau--wood.png"> | <img src="https://2020.igem.org/wiki/images/2/2e/T--Puiching_Macau--wood.png"> | ||
<div class="legend">Figure 3. Flame retardancy test using wood. | <div class="legend">Figure 3. Flame retardancy test using wood. | ||
− | <p>As demonstrated in Fig 3, all of our engineered K3503001, K3503007 and K3507008 flame retardants displayed | + | <p>As demonstrated in Fig 3, all of our engineered K3503001, K3503007 and K3507008 flame retardants displayed an improvement compared with the water control. </p> |
</html> | </html> |
Latest revision as of 21:58, 27 October 2020
mfp5-alpha casein-His
This is a composite part designed to improve the fire retardancy with mussel adhesion protein K3089023. The protein sequence in this part is based on Alpha s1 casein (K2924026)
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BamHI site found at 499
Illegal BamHI site found at 727
Illegal BamHI site found at 1525 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Successful expression of K3503007
In order to validate the protein expression of K3503001, K3503007 and K3503008, we performed SDS-PAGE (coomassie blue staining) and Western blot analysis. To make K3503001, K3503007 and K3503008 easily detectable via Western Blot, we designed our constructs to include a “His tag” which is targeted by a commercially available antibody. With the SDS-PAGE and western blot (anti-his for his-tagged protein), we found successful expression of K3503001, K3503007 and K3503008.
Before performing the SDS-PAGE, we grew up our engineered E. coli cells containing a plasmid with K3503001, K3503007 and K3503008 under control of the T7 promoter. Cells were induced with0.1mM IPTG until either OD0.4 (wavelength: 600nm) at 30°C. After expression, cells were then lysed according to our protein extraction protocol, and supernatant and pellet were collected for the SDS-PAGE.
(a) Coomassie blue staining
(b) Western Blot
- Lane1: Bio rad protein dual color ladder;
- Lane2: pet11a
- Lane3: K3503001
- Lane4:K3503001 with 0.1mM IPTG induction
- Lane5: K3503007
- Lane6: K3503007 with 0.1mM IPTG induction
- Lane7: K3503008
- Lane8:K3503008 with 0.1mM IPTG induction
Fire retardant test of K3503007
The test subject was in the size of bed sheet in 300*130mm and the average Moisture content% is 13.55%-14.37%. As demonstrated on Fig 2, all of our engineered flame retardant displayed an improvement compared with the water control.
As demonstrated in Fig 3, all of our engineered K3503001, K3503007 and K3507008 flame retardants displayed an improvement compared with the water control.