Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3369000:Experience"
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K3369000 EndReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K3369000 EndReviews</partinfo> | ||
| + | ===NOS cloning=== | ||
| + | NOS cloning | ||
| + | In our experiment, we first cloned NOS gene in Bacillus subtilis by PCR and attached it to Pet28-a for determination using double restriction enzyme and DNA ligase. Then the ligated vector was transformed into the BL21(DE3) for protein expression and DH5α for plasmid application. The plasmid was sequencing by company. It accords with our design. | ||
| + | <html> | ||
| + | <figure> | ||
| + | <img style="width:60%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/6/6e/T--Tsinghua--MLGB5.png"> | ||
| + | <figcaption> | ||
| + | <b>Figure1: The result of NOS PCR.</b> | ||
| + | </figcaption> | ||
| + | </figure> | ||
| + | </html> | ||
===NO detection=== | ===NO detection=== | ||
| Line 29: | Line 40: | ||
<img style="width:60%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/6/6e/T--Tsinghua--MLGB2.png"> | <img style="width:60%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/6/6e/T--Tsinghua--MLGB2.png"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
| − | <b> | + | <b>Figure2: The standard curve of OD540 and NaNO2 concentration.</b> |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 51: | ||
<img style="width:60%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/f/f7/T--Tsinghua--MLGB1.png"> | <img style="width:60%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/f/f7/T--Tsinghua--MLGB1.png"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
| − | <b> | + | <b>Figure3: The difference value of NO between IPTG induced and no IPTG induced.</b> |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
| Line 54: | Line 65: | ||
<img style="width:60%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/f/f8/T--Tsinghua--MLGB4.png"> | <img style="width:60%" src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/f/f8/T--Tsinghua--MLGB4.png"> | ||
<figcaption> | <figcaption> | ||
| − | <b> | + | <b>Figure4: The result of Western blot.</b> |
</figcaption> | </figcaption> | ||
</figure> | </figure> | ||
Revision as of 18:28, 27 October 2020
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_K3369000
User Reviews
UNIQc9950409ce7fe605-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQc9950409ce7fe605-partinfo-00000001-QINU
NOS cloning
NOS cloning
In our experiment, we first cloned NOS gene in Bacillus subtilis by PCR and attached it to Pet28-a for determination using double restriction enzyme and DNA ligase. Then the ligated vector was transformed into the BL21(DE3) for protein expression and DH5α for plasmid application. The plasmid was sequencing by company. It accords with our design.
NO detection
We first prepared standard curves using standard samples of different concentrations NaNO2 and verified the linear relationship between concentration and OD540. As can be seen from the figure, OD540 has a good linear relationship with the 1μl to 100μl concentration, so OD540 can be used to reflect the content of NO in the sample
Then we separately measured the change of NO over time in the NOS transformed BL21 (DE3) culture. We found that the nitrite content actually decreased over the initial period of time. The change of nitrite in the bacterial solution without IPTG induction with time was measured. We found that the nitrite content in the bacterial solution also decreased at the initial stage. This may be caused by the consumption of nitrite by the growth of bacteria, so we want to reflect the production of NO by the difference value of nitrite content between IPTG induced and no IPTG induced. The results are as followed.
As we can see, the difference value of two culture become bigger as time goes
Western blot
To demonstrate that our expression system does work and to explore NOS proteins as time goes by, we performed Western blot. The culture conditions are the same as those described previously. Due to the operation, only 0-4h was detected. At the same time, GFP-His was added as the positive control.
We can see that the expression of NOS-HIS gradually increased with the change of time, indicating that there was NO problem with our expression system, which also explains why the production of NO gradually increased, because in the first hours induced by IPTG, the protein expression was low, and the protein amount did not increase significantly until four hours.