Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3328039:Design"
(→References) |
(→References) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===References=== | ===References=== | ||
− | + | Green, A. A., Silver, P. A., Collins, J. J., and Yin, P. (2014) toehold switches: de-novo- | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
designed regulators of gene expression. Cell 159, 925– 939, DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.002 | designed regulators of gene expression. Cell 159, 925– 939, DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.002 |
Revision as of 17:44, 20 October 2020
triggerA of IMPLY gate (IMPLY1)
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Design Notes
We combined the 3WJ switch and toehold switch to realize the IMPLY Boolean calculation. When no trigger expressed, this logic gate just likes a 3WJ switch. When trigger A expressed, the trigger will bind to the switch RNA. The binding allows for a branch migration process, exposing AUG and RBS for translation initiation. When trigger B expressed, the trigger will bind to 3WJ switch RNA. The resulting trigger–switch complex has a stable 3WJ structure that effectively sequesters the RBS and start codon within the loop and stem of the switch RNA, respectively, and strongly represses translation. When trigger A and B both expressed, the binding of trigger RNA to the toehold sequence allow the RNA polymerase binds to the former RBS and break open 3WJ stable hairpin.
Source
synthesize from company
References
Green, A. A., Silver, P. A., Collins, J. J., and Yin, P. (2014) toehold switches: de-novo- designed regulators of gene expression. Cell 159, 925– 939, DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.002