Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3634003:Design"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | __NOTOC__ | ||
+ | <partinfo>BBa_K3634003 short</partinfo> | ||
+ | <partinfo>BBa_K3634003 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===Design Notes=== | ||
+ | Initially, part BBa_K814003 (Minnesota iGEM, 2012) was taken and the sequence found to include a single XbaI illegal restriction site at bp 2604. The appropriate synonymous mutation was made in silico to remove this site (t2604a). This allowed for the part to be used at RFC[10] and RFC[1000] standard without codon optimisation. The sequence was then optimised using the IDT codon optimisation tool. This resulted in a new SapI, EcoR1 and PstI illegal restriction sites at bp 855, 1195 and 1976 respectively. The appropriate synonymous mutation was then made in silico to remove these additional sites (t852a, a1197g & g1974c). This allowed for the part to be used at RFC[10] and RFC[1000] standard with codon optimisation. Unlike previous parts optimised, the NRPS optimised sequence was flagged as being of ‘low complexity’ indicating that some complexities with the part existed but it was not anticipated to be problematic. One point of this described complexity was that one or more repeated sequences greater than 8 bases comprised 48% of the overall sequence. The second point of complexity was that a specific region of 13 bases was composed of 84.6% G bases, starting at bp 1111. It was suggested that if issues were to arise from the above part sequence, it be redesigned to reduce the repeats to less than 40% of the sequence. As for the GC rich region, the length of the sequence should be reduced to under 8 bases or the percentage of G base composition reduced to less than 80% respectively if any problems were to occur. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Source=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The initial genomic sequence came from Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413 which can be obtained from part BBa_K814001 (Minnesota iGEM, 2012). | ||
+ | The part sequence was then optimised for our chosen chassis organism, E.coli, using the IDT codon optimisation tool. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===References=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Minnesota iGEM 2012 - https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K814003 | ||
+ | |||
+ | IDT Codon Optimisation Tool - https://eu.idtdna.com/CodonOpt | ||
+ | |||
+ | Balskus, E.P, Walsh, C.T. 2010. The Genetic and Molecular Basis for Sunscreen Biosynthesis in Cyanobacteria. Science. 329 (5999): p1653-1656. DOI: 10.1126/science.1193637 |
Latest revision as of 08:12, 21 July 2020
Nonribosomal Peptide Synthetase (NRPS) (Codon Optimised for E.coli)
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 458
Illegal BamHI site found at 2511 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Design Notes
Initially, part BBa_K814003 (Minnesota iGEM, 2012) was taken and the sequence found to include a single XbaI illegal restriction site at bp 2604. The appropriate synonymous mutation was made in silico to remove this site (t2604a). This allowed for the part to be used at RFC[10] and RFC[1000] standard without codon optimisation. The sequence was then optimised using the IDT codon optimisation tool. This resulted in a new SapI, EcoR1 and PstI illegal restriction sites at bp 855, 1195 and 1976 respectively. The appropriate synonymous mutation was then made in silico to remove these additional sites (t852a, a1197g & g1974c). This allowed for the part to be used at RFC[10] and RFC[1000] standard with codon optimisation. Unlike previous parts optimised, the NRPS optimised sequence was flagged as being of ‘low complexity’ indicating that some complexities with the part existed but it was not anticipated to be problematic. One point of this described complexity was that one or more repeated sequences greater than 8 bases comprised 48% of the overall sequence. The second point of complexity was that a specific region of 13 bases was composed of 84.6% G bases, starting at bp 1111. It was suggested that if issues were to arise from the above part sequence, it be redesigned to reduce the repeats to less than 40% of the sequence. As for the GC rich region, the length of the sequence should be reduced to under 8 bases or the percentage of G base composition reduced to less than 80% respectively if any problems were to occur.
Source
The initial genomic sequence came from Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413 which can be obtained from part BBa_K814001 (Minnesota iGEM, 2012). The part sequence was then optimised for our chosen chassis organism, E.coli, using the IDT codon optimisation tool.
References
Minnesota iGEM 2012 - https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K814003
IDT Codon Optimisation Tool - https://eu.idtdna.com/CodonOpt
Balskus, E.P, Walsh, C.T. 2010. The Genetic and Molecular Basis for Sunscreen Biosynthesis in Cyanobacteria. Science. 329 (5999): p1653-1656. DOI: 10.1126/science.1193637