Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa J100534:Experience"
(→User Reviews) |
(→Applications of BBa_J100534) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
[[File:simplegraph2020.png|500px]] | [[File:simplegraph2020.png|500px]] | ||
+ | </center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <center> | ||
+ | [[File:gelelectro2020.png|500px]] | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
Revision as of 16:13, 10 March 2020
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_J100534
User Reviews
UNIQ9a990eb23692f6f8-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ9a990eb23692f6f8-partinfo-00000001-QINU
Data was derived by dividing fluorescence of each sample by optical density once readings had been collected from the spectrophotometer. The collected data showed a general trend of RFP production being hindered by incubating each experimental group in 42 degrees Celsius for one hour. The control experimental groups produced slightly more RFP. This suggests that the heat may have denatured the promoter and reduced its functioning capacity. The original X colonies were derived from red cells produced after we prepared our bacterial cells. Three red cells were produced in the experimental colony, which we used for the X1, X2, and X3 samples. The X1 colony was grown from a cell that was very faintly red; this could account for the fact that little RFP was produced in the presence and absence of heat. Therefore, we decided to exclude the X1 data from the X control and X heat averages on the second graph pictured above.