Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1119010"
(→Contribution: NUDT_CHINA 2019) |
(→Contribution: NUDT_CHINA 2019) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Summary:in this part, we made contributions to the quantitative characterization data of Human Elongation Factor-1alpha (EF1α)Promoter. | Summary:in this part, we made contributions to the quantitative characterization data of Human Elongation Factor-1alpha (EF1α)Promoter. | ||
− | Accurate characterization of promoter behavior is essential for the rational design of functional synthetic transcription networks such as logic gates and oscillators[1]. To quantify the reliability of EF1α promoter characteristics with time, pcDNA3.1-9XGSP-GFP was | + | Accurate characterization of promoter behavior is essential for the rational design of functional synthetic transcription networks such as logic gates and oscillators[1]. To quantify the reliability of EF1α promoter characteristics with time, pcDNA3.1-9XGSP-GFP was co-transfected with plv-mCherry by Lipofectamine™3000 into liver carcinoma cell line HepG2. We measured the strength of this promoter by expression change of mCherry at continous time set after transfection of 6, 18, 30 and 54 hours. |
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/4/4d/T--NUDT_CHINA--silver-3.jpg | https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/4/4d/T--NUDT_CHINA--silver-3.jpg |
Revision as of 17:02, 21 October 2019
Human Elongation Factor-1alpha Promoter
The constitutive human Elongation Factor-1alpha (EF-1alpha) Promoter regulates gene expression in mammalian cells. It is known that the CMV promoter is commonly used for constitutive expression, and here we introduce EF-1alpha promoter as an alternative mammalian promoter, which works in a wide range of cell types. The origin of this part is from Homo sapiens chromosome 6 genomic contig, GRCh37. p13.
Characterization
In our characterization, the sequence of EF-1alpha Promoter was assembled in front of a GFP reporter (BBa_K648013) and hGH polyA terminator (BBa_K404108) using Freiburg’s RFC25 format. The EF-1alpha promoter-GFP was then transfected into HEK293FT cells and in vivo green fluorescence signal was observed under fluorescence microscope. The positive control was iDUET101a plasmid ([http://www.addgene.org/17629/ Addgene Plasmid Number 17629]) that contains EGFP reporter driven by an EF-1alpha promoter. A negative control was made by GFP generator that does not contain the EF-1alpha promoter. As a side by side comparison, a CMV promoter driven GFP reporter was also transfected, though a quantitative comparison between the two was not conducted in our characterization.
The [http://2013.igem.org/Team:Hong_Kong_HKUST/characterization/ef1a detailed description] of our characterization can be found in HKUST iGEM 2013 Wiki.
At the time of regional jamboree, no GFP signal could be observed in cells transfected with GFP reporter driven by EF-1alpha promoter. Originally, we thought that the sequence of EF-1alpha promoter cloned from iDUET101a contained the full functional promoter region annotated in pBudCE4.1 (Invitrogen). We believed that EF-1alpha did trigger transcription but failed to translate the GFP coding sequence due to insufficient 5’ untranslated region (UTR). After the regional jamboree, the promoter was re-cloned with additional 3' sequences after the identified TATA box to allow a longer 5’ untranslated region before the GFP coding DNA sequence. From the the results above, we believed that translation of GFP is successful this time.
Contribution: NUDT_CHINA 2019
Summary:in this part, we made contributions to the quantitative characterization data of Human Elongation Factor-1alpha (EF1α)Promoter.
Accurate characterization of promoter behavior is essential for the rational design of functional synthetic transcription networks such as logic gates and oscillators[1]. To quantify the reliability of EF1α promoter characteristics with time, pcDNA3.1-9XGSP-GFP was co-transfected with plv-mCherry by Lipofectamine™3000 into liver carcinoma cell line HepG2. We measured the strength of this promoter by expression change of mCherry at continous time set after transfection of 6, 18, 30 and 54 hours.
Figure 2. mCherry intensity photographed by fluorescence microscopy, fluorescence intensity calculated by ImageJ.
As is shown from the results, initiation strength of this EF1α promoter kept rising at the first 30 hours after transfection. But its activity obviously decreased at 54 hour.
Reference [1]Rudge TJ, Brown JR, Federici F, Dalchau N, Phillips A, Ajioka JW, Haseloff J. Characterization of Intrinsic Properties of Promoters. ACS Synth Biol. 2016 Jan 15;5(1):89-98. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00116. Epub 2016 Jan 7. PMID: 26436725; PMCID: PMC5023225.
Reference
Qin, Jane Yuxia, Li Zhang, et al. "Systematic Comparison of Constitutive Promoters and the Doxycycline-Inducible Promoter." PLoS ONE. 5.5 (2010) <http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0010611>.
Zhou, B. Y., Ye, Z., Chen, G., Gao, Z. P., Zhang, Y. A., & Cheng, L. (2007). Inducible and reversible transgene expression in human stem cells after efficient and stable gene transfer. Stem Cells, 25(3), 779-789. doi:10.1634/stemcells.2006-0128 <http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1634/stemcells.2006-0128/abstract>
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 83
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]