Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3185006"
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
[[File:191008 Dot Blot.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig.2 Plastic-binding protein binding to PET film | [[File:191008 Dot Blot.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig.2 Plastic-binding protein binding to PET film | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | A 3µL of protein solution dropped on PET film, then left for 20min. | + | A 3µL of protein solution dropped on PET film with serial dilution, then left for 20min. Then, the film was washed in TBST for 5min x3, then placed with Anti-His-tag-HRP conjugated for 1h. After washing, ECL substrate was added, then chemiluminescence was imaged by LAS-3000. The exposure time is 6min.]] |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File:Cloth dot blot dry.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig.3a Cloth dot blot by fluorescent plastic-binding protein before washing. | [[File:Cloth dot blot dry.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig.3a Cloth dot blot by fluorescent plastic-binding protein before washing. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | The dilution collection of each protein was dropped on PET cloth, then left for 20min. | + | The dilution collection of each protein was dropped on PET cloth, then left for 20min. The protein fluorescent was imaged by LAS-3000. The exposure time is 10sec. Saturated signals were painted red.]] |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File:Cloth Dot Blot washed.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig.3b Cloth dot blot by fluorescent plastic-binding protein after washing. | [[File:Cloth Dot Blot washed.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig.3b Cloth dot blot by fluorescent plastic-binding protein after washing. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | The dilution collection of each protein was dropped on PET cloth, then left for 20min. | + | The dilution collection of each protein was dropped on PET cloth, then left for 20min. The cloth was washed in TBST for 5min x3, then protein fluorescent was imaged by LAS-3000. The exposure time is 10sec. Saturated signals were painted red.]] |
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
[[File:Cloth blot graph.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig.4 Percentage of protein retention on PET cloth | [[File:Cloth blot graph.png|300px|thumb|right|Fig.4 Percentage of protein retention on PET cloth | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | The whole signal of 37.5ng dot was used for this quantification, percentages of protein retention were calculated by comparing intensity before and after washing. | |
]] | ]] | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
3µL of SpyCatcher-Plastic-binding protein (SpyC-PBP) solution and 3µL of SpyTag inserted TmEncapsulin (SpyTmEnc) solution was mixed, then placed for 16h at room temperature. Then 6µL of 2x SDS sample buffer was added. 10µL of each sample was loaded. SDS-PAGE for 30min in 200V. The gel was CBB stained. | 3µL of SpyCatcher-Plastic-binding protein (SpyC-PBP) solution and 3µL of SpyTag inserted TmEncapsulin (SpyTmEnc) solution was mixed, then placed for 16h at room temperature. Then 6µL of 2x SDS sample buffer was added. 10µL of each sample was loaded. SDS-PAGE for 30min in 200V. The gel was CBB stained. | ||
]] | ]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3><font size="4.5">PET film assay</font> </h3> | ||
+ | We tried to compare our proteins with each other by the film dot blotting.<br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | As shown in Fig.2, the negative control protein, SpyCatcher (SPYC), did not stain PET film at all. In contrast, the plastic-binding proteins tested here strongly stained the PET film. As stains spread, we could not quantify their signals. This blot spreading might be due to the plastic-binding proteins’ fast binding rate. The proteins in excess liquid could have bound to the neighbor area of the film in the first wash step.<br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Although this experiment suggested our plastic-binding proteins can quickly bind to PET’s smooth surface, we could not compare binding affinity quantitatively.<br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <h3><font size="4.5">PET cloth assay</font> </h3> | ||
+ | Next, we quantified how much protein binds to PET fiber with fluorescence. LCI proteins can be seen with fluorescent signals because it is fused with sfGFP. <br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | We bought a white PET T-shirt and cut it into pieces. The lysate of E.coli which expresses protein is used for this experiment. The concentrations of fluorescent proteins were measured by SDS-PAGE and CBB-staining, and an equal amount of proteins were used for each assay. Diluted proteins were spotted on a piece of PET cloth. The cloth was incubated for 20 min at room temperature, then washed by TBST for 5 min 3 times. Finally, fluorescent proteins were photographed. <br> | ||
+ | Fig.3a shows the cloth before wash, and 3b shows the same cloth after wash. As shown in figures, sfGFP was completely washed out. In sharp contrast, LCI strongly stuck to PET cloth. The intensity of dot was quantified with ImageJ. <br> | ||
+ | As shown in Fig.4, about 65% of LCI KR-2 were still observed on PET cloth after wash, showing these proteins are really strong PET cloth binders.<br><br> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Based on the data shown above, we concluded that our fluorescent plastic-binding proteins highly stably bind to PET cloth. In order to demonstrate this conclusion clearly, we drew a picture by two different GFP inks; sfGFP alone and GFP-LCI KR-2. When washed by TBST, sfGFP is washed out, while the stable PET binder GFP-LCI KR-2 remains. | ||
+ | <div class='visualClear'></div> | ||
+ | [[File:Konkon.mp4|600px|thumb|right|Movie. Fluorescent “Konkon” appears on PET cloth | ||
+ | <br> | ||
+ | We wrote mascot “Konkon” with LCI KR-2 protein solution, then the cloth was soaked in sfGFP solution. In this movie, the cloth is washed with tap water. | ||
+ | ]] | ||
+ | <div class='visualClear'></div> | ||
+ | <h3><font size="4.5">PET cloth assay</font> </h3> | ||
+ | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Revision as of 02:03, 21 October 2019
SPYCatcher -> sfGFP -> LCI KR-2
Usage and Biology
LCI is a protein from Bacillus subtili. The paper shows that it can bind to polypropylene(PP)[1].
Another paper shows the improved variant, LCI-KR2(Y29R and G35R; variant KR-2)[2]. Its affinity is 5.4±0.5 times stronger than natural LCI.
We used LCI-KR2 for binding protein to PP. We inserted superfolder GFP (sfGFP) which folding interval is shortened by improving natural GFP on the N-terminus of LCI (BBa_I746916). By doing so we wanted to do the binding assay with fluorescence. Moreover, we put SpyCatcher(BBa_K1159200)[ on N-terminus of sfGFP because we used SpyCatcher/SpyTag system to bind it to other parts.
This part has four tags. First is 6×His-tag inserted on the N-terminus of SpyC for protein purification. Second is MYC-tag inserted between sfGFP and Spy-Catcher to detect it by using the antibody. The third is a TEV protease site and we put it into two regions because it was used for protein purification in the paper[3].
We put it between BamHI site and Ndel site on pET11-a. The expression plasmids were introduced into BL21(DE3) and expressed by T7 promoter/ T7 RNAP system. Ni-NTA agarose was used for the purification.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NotI site found at 1174
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal SapI.rc site found at 460
Purification
Expression
- Cells were grown in 200ml LB media (100μg/ml Ampicillin) at 37oC shaking at 140 rpm to an OD600 of 0.5, verifying via a spectrophotometer.
- Protein was expressed in 0.1mM IPTG for 2hours.
Purification
1. E.coli which expressed this part were lysed with sonification.
2. Proteins are purified from lysate with Ni-NTA agarose(QIAGEN).
3. Imidazole eluates were visualized and confirmed by SDS-PAGE followed by CBB staining.
This purification method works. As shown in Fig.1, the protein successfully purified.
Result
PET film assay
We tried to compare our proteins with each other by the film dot blotting.
As shown in Fig.2, the negative control protein, SpyCatcher (SPYC), did not stain PET film at all. In contrast, the plastic-binding proteins tested here strongly stained the PET film. As stains spread, we could not quantify their signals. This blot spreading might be due to the plastic-binding proteins’ fast binding rate. The proteins in excess liquid could have bound to the neighbor area of the film in the first wash step.
Although this experiment suggested our plastic-binding proteins can quickly bind to PET’s smooth surface, we could not compare binding affinity quantitatively.
PET cloth assay
Next, we quantified how much protein binds to PET fiber with fluorescence. LCI proteins can be seen with fluorescent signals because it is fused with sfGFP.
We bought a white PET T-shirt and cut it into pieces. The lysate of E.coli which expresses protein is used for this experiment. The concentrations of fluorescent proteins were measured by SDS-PAGE and CBB-staining, and an equal amount of proteins were used for each assay. Diluted proteins were spotted on a piece of PET cloth. The cloth was incubated for 20 min at room temperature, then washed by TBST for 5 min 3 times. Finally, fluorescent proteins were photographed.
Fig.3a shows the cloth before wash, and 3b shows the same cloth after wash. As shown in figures, sfGFP was completely washed out. In sharp contrast, LCI strongly stuck to PET cloth. The intensity of dot was quantified with ImageJ.
As shown in Fig.4, about 65% of LCI KR-2 were still observed on PET cloth after wash, showing these proteins are really strong PET cloth binders.
Based on the data shown above, we concluded that our fluorescent plastic-binding proteins highly stably bind to PET cloth. In order to demonstrate this conclusion clearly, we drew a picture by two different GFP inks; sfGFP alone and GFP-LCI KR-2. When washed by TBST, sfGFP is washed out, while the stable PET binder GFP-LCI KR-2 remains.
PET cloth assay
References
1 Rübsam, K., Stomps, B., Böker, A., Jakob, F., and Schwaneberg, U. (2017).
Anchor peptides: A green and versatile method for polypropylene functionalization.
Polymer (Guildf). 116, 124–132.
2 Rübsam, K., Davari, M.D., Jakob, F., and Schwaneberg, U. (2018).
KnowVolution of the polymer-binding peptide LCI for improved polypropylene binding.
Polymers (Basel). 10, 1–12.
3 Rübsam, K., Weber, L., Jakob, F., and Schwaneberg, U. (2018).
Directed evolution of polypropylene and polystyrene binding peptides.
Biotechnol. Bioeng. 115, 321–330.