Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3132020"

 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
<partinfo>BBa_K3132020 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K3132020 short</partinfo>
  
In our SynNotch system, we retained the functional sequence of the transmembrane domain from &#945;-CD19 Notch. At the N-terminus, we used anti-HER2 scFV(BBa_K3132005) as the extracellular domain of our synNotch recepter to specifically recognize HER2, the tumor surface antigen we chose as the target, so that our engineered NK cells obtain the ability to response to HER2 on the surface of the cancer cell. We put Gal4-VP64 (a fusion protein) in the downstream of the transmembrane domain, as the intracelluar domain of the synNotch. In the presence of tumor marker antigen HER2, SynNotch protein will be cleaved, and thus Gal4-VP64 fusion protein will be detached from the cell membrane.
+
In our SynNotch system, we kept the functional sequence of the transmembrane domain from α-CD19 Notch. At the N-terminus, we used anti-HER2 scFV(BBa_K3132005) as the extracellular domain of our synNotch recepter to specifically recognize HER2, the tumor surface antigen we chose as the target, so that our engineered NK cells obtain the ability to response to HER2 on the surface of the cancer cell. We fused Gal4-VP64 to the downstream of the transmembrane domain as the intracellular domain of synNotch. In the presence of tumor marker antigen HER2, Gal4-VP64 fusion proteins will be detached from the cell membrane and function as transcription factors. The released Gal4-VP64 will be located into nuclei and recognize UAS sequence in its corresponding promoter UAS_MinimalCMV (BBa_K3132004) and activate expression of targeted genes.
The released Gal4-VP64 will be located into nuclei and recognize UAS sequence in its corresponding promoter UAS_MinimalCMV (BBa_K3132004) and then these two proteins combine together, which enable our CAR and IL-2 gene expressed with high efficiency, performing killing activity and inducing signal molecules secretion. The relevant experiments have confirmed our our expectations.
+
<h3><b>Selection of tumor cell lines</b></h3>
 +
Before beginning the experiments on synNotch, we first selected two tumor cell lines as cell models. They are breast cancer cell lines SK-BR3 and MCF-7. We measured HER2 expression level of two cell lines by flow cytometry (Figure 1). The results showed that SK-BR3 tumor cells are HER2 high-expressing and MCF-7 tumor cells are HER2 low-expressing. Therefore, we used these two cell lines to test the differentiating effect of synNotch receptors.
 +
[[File:T--SMMU-China--synnotch 1.png|800px|thumb|center| Figure 1. HER2 surface expression levels on tumor cell lines SK-BR3 and MCF-7.]]
 +
==Characterization of synNotch receptors and selection of the intracellular transcription factor==
 +
Then we tested the response of synNotch receptors with three different transcription factors fused to intracellular segments, hoping we could find a most suitable one with high activity and selectivity. The transcription factors included PIP-VP64(BBa_K3132003), Gal4-VP64(BBa_K3132000), and ZF21-16-VP64(BBa_K3132001). The activity of these three parts can be found on their part pages. Each three synNotch receptor was expressed on the surface of HEK-293 cells. We also transfected reporter plasmids with corresponding promoters regulated by the transcription factors. Then these transfected cells were counted and co-cultured with the two types of tumor cell lines characterized above at the ratio 1:1. Twenty-four hours later, fluorescence intensity was measured to indicate the efficiency of gene activation.
 +
All three types of synNotch receptors with transcription factors Gal4-VP64, PIP-VP64 and ZF21-16-VP64 were able respond to HER2 on target cells. The fluorescence intensity detected in co-culture system with SKBR-3 cell line was about twice of that in MCF-7 co-culture system. Moreover, we found that PIP-VP64 had the most effective response, as it had the strongest fluorescence intensity compared with the other two pairs. However, background activity was also observed in all three groups and the leakage in PIP group was the strongest. Considering these two findings, we finally chose Gal4-VP64 as the intracellular domain of anti-HER2 synNotch for it had a relatively strong activity but had a lower background than PIP-VP64.
 +
[[File:T--SMMU-China--synnotch 2.png|600px|thumb|center| Figure 2. Response of three types of synNotch with different transcription factors Gal4-VP64, PIP-VP64 and ZF21-16-VP64 fused to intracellular segments.]]
  
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here
 
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here

Revision as of 14:53, 20 October 2019


SynNotch-anti-HER2

In our SynNotch system, we kept the functional sequence of the transmembrane domain from α-CD19 Notch. At the N-terminus, we used anti-HER2 scFV(BBa_K3132005) as the extracellular domain of our synNotch recepter to specifically recognize HER2, the tumor surface antigen we chose as the target, so that our engineered NK cells obtain the ability to response to HER2 on the surface of the cancer cell. We fused Gal4-VP64 to the downstream of the transmembrane domain as the intracellular domain of synNotch. In the presence of tumor marker antigen HER2, Gal4-VP64 fusion proteins will be detached from the cell membrane and function as transcription factors. The released Gal4-VP64 will be located into nuclei and recognize UAS sequence in its corresponding promoter UAS_MinimalCMV (BBa_K3132004) and activate expression of targeted genes.

Selection of tumor cell lines

Before beginning the experiments on synNotch, we first selected two tumor cell lines as cell models. They are breast cancer cell lines SK-BR3 and MCF-7. We measured HER2 expression level of two cell lines by flow cytometry (Figure 1). The results showed that SK-BR3 tumor cells are HER2 high-expressing and MCF-7 tumor cells are HER2 low-expressing. Therefore, we used these two cell lines to test the differentiating effect of synNotch receptors.

Figure 1. HER2 surface expression levels on tumor cell lines SK-BR3 and MCF-7.

Characterization of synNotch receptors and selection of the intracellular transcription factor

Then we tested the response of synNotch receptors with three different transcription factors fused to intracellular segments, hoping we could find a most suitable one with high activity and selectivity. The transcription factors included PIP-VP64(BBa_K3132003), Gal4-VP64(BBa_K3132000), and ZF21-16-VP64(BBa_K3132001). The activity of these three parts can be found on their part pages. Each three synNotch receptor was expressed on the surface of HEK-293 cells. We also transfected reporter plasmids with corresponding promoters regulated by the transcription factors. Then these transfected cells were counted and co-cultured with the two types of tumor cell lines characterized above at the ratio 1:1. Twenty-four hours later, fluorescence intensity was measured to indicate the efficiency of gene activation. All three types of synNotch receptors with transcription factors Gal4-VP64, PIP-VP64 and ZF21-16-VP64 were able respond to HER2 on target cells. The fluorescence intensity detected in co-culture system with SKBR-3 cell line was about twice of that in MCF-7 co-culture system. Moreover, we found that PIP-VP64 had the most effective response, as it had the strongest fluorescence intensity compared with the other two pairs. However, background activity was also observed in all three groups and the leakage in PIP group was the strongest. Considering these two findings, we finally chose Gal4-VP64 as the intracellular domain of anti-HER2 synNotch for it had a relatively strong activity but had a lower background than PIP-VP64.

Figure 2. Response of three types of synNotch with different transcription factors Gal4-VP64, PIP-VP64 and ZF21-16-VP64 fused to intracellular segments.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NotI site found at 1642
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal BglII site found at 56
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 985
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1162
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1700
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1748
    Illegal NgoMIV site found at 1883
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal SapI.rc site found at 1321