Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3019001"
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Yeast strain construction | Yeast strain construction | ||
− | Constructed vectors with GFP under target promoters were restricted and used for yeast transformation. S. cerevisiae DOM90 (MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+]) strain was transformed. All the yeast strains generated and used for promoter characterization are listed in Table 1. | + | Constructed vectors with GFP under target promoters were restricted and used for yeast transformation. <i>S. cerevisiae</i> DOM90 <i>(MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+])</i> strain was transformed. All the yeast strains generated and used for promoter characterization are listed in Table 1. |
Table 1. Yeast strains used for promoter characterization experiments | Table 1. Yeast strains used for promoter characterization experiments | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|DOM0090 | |DOM0090 | ||
− | |ura3-1::pRS306-URA3 | + | |<i>ura3</i>-1::pRS306-URA3 |
|Strain with empty vector; was used as a negative control for GFP fluorescence | |Strain with empty vector; was used as a negative control for GFP fluorescence | ||
|- | |- | ||
|TTI_1 | |TTI_1 | ||
− | |ura3-1::pRS306-pTDH3-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 | + | |<i>ura3</i>-1::pRS306-pTDH3-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 |
|Strain with EGFP under TDH3 promoter; was used as a positive control for GFP fluorescence | |Strain with EGFP under TDH3 promoter; was used as a positive control for GFP fluorescence | ||
|- | |- | ||
|TTI_5 | |TTI_5 | ||
− | |ura3-1::pRS306 pRNR1-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 | + | |<i>ura3</i>-1::pRS306 pRNR1-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 |
|Strain with GFP under pRNR1 promoter | |Strain with GFP under pRNR1 promoter | ||
|} | |} | ||
− | *DOM90 strain (MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+]) was used for transformation. In the Genotype column, only the differences between strains are provided. | + | *DOM90 strain <i>(MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+])</i> was used for transformation. In the Genotype column, only the differences between strains are provided. |
Following transformation, separate yeast colonies were screened for the presence of the insert under the fluorescent microscope. Colonies displaying GFP fluorescence were selected for further fluorescence measurement experiment. | Following transformation, separate yeast colonies were screened for the presence of the insert under the fluorescent microscope. Colonies displaying GFP fluorescence were selected for further fluorescence measurement experiment. | ||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
|Carbon source | |Carbon source | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |ura3-1::pRS306-URA3 | + | |<i>ura3</i>-1::pRS306-URA3 |
|CSM | |CSM | ||
|2% glucose | |2% glucose | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |ura3-1::pRS306-pTDH3-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 | + | |<i>ura3</i>-1::pRS306-pTDH3-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 |
|CSM | |CSM | ||
|2% glucose | |2% glucose | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |ura3-1::pRS306 pRNR1-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 | + | |<i>ura3</i>-1::pRS306 pRNR1-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 |
|CSM | |CSM | ||
|2% glucose | |2% glucose | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
As can be seen from Figure 1, EGFP under pRNR1 showed 40% higher fluorescence in comparison to a positive control (pTDH3-EGFP). | As can be seen from Figure 1, EGFP under pRNR1 showed 40% higher fluorescence in comparison to a positive control (pTDH3-EGFP). | ||
− | + | Figure 1. | |
[[File:RNR1.jpg|500px]] | [[File:RNR1.jpg|500px]] |
Latest revision as of 11:27, 19 October 2019
pRNR1 promoter from S. cerevisiae
1000bp up the RNR1 gene. Constitutive promoter.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 297
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 2212
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 1531
INTRODUCTION
pRNR1 is a constitutive promoter. In order to determine the strength of pRNR1 promoter, we have conducted the following experiment. First of all, we have constructed a plasmid where EGFP is expressed under the pRNR1 promoter. The empty plasmid was used as a negative control.
Methodology
All common methods such as PCR, agarose gel electrophoresis, miniprep, bacterial and yeast transformation, and some others are described in the Methodology section in Tartu_TUIT2019 wiki page.
Plasmid construction Target promoters were PCR amplified from yeast genomic DNA with primers containing SacI (forward primer) and NotI (reverse primer) restriction sites at their 5’-ends. PCR products were separated on the agarose gel, purified and cut with SacI/NotI enzymes. As a backbone, we used pRS306 plasmid containing pTDH3-GFP-tCYC1 cassette. The vector was digested with SacI/NotI restriction enzymes, which cut out the pTDH3 promoter region, and was ligated with our target promoter. After bacterial transformation and miniprep, sequence-verified plasmids were used for yeast transformation.
Yeast strain construction
Constructed vectors with GFP under target promoters were restricted and used for yeast transformation. S. cerevisiae DOM90 (MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+]) strain was transformed. All the yeast strains generated and used for promoter characterization are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Yeast strains used for promoter characterization experiments
Strain name | Genotype* | Description |
DOM0090 | ura3-1::pRS306-URA3 | Strain with empty vector; was used as a negative control for GFP fluorescence |
TTI_1 | ura3-1::pRS306-pTDH3-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 | Strain with EGFP under TDH3 promoter; was used as a positive control for GFP fluorescence |
TTI_5 | ura3-1::pRS306 pRNR1-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 | Strain with GFP under pRNR1 promoter |
- DOM90 strain (MATa {leu2-3,112 trp1-1 can1-100 ura3-1 ade2-1 his3-11,15 bar1::hisG} [phi+]) was used for transformation. In the Genotype column, only the differences between strains are provided.
Following transformation, separate yeast colonies were screened for the presence of the insert under the fluorescent microscope. Colonies displaying GFP fluorescence were selected for further fluorescence measurement experiment.
Fluorescence measurement
Prior to measurements, yeast strains were pregrown in liquid media overnight at 30°C and 200 RPM in the shaker incubator. The next day, optical density (OD600) of yeast cultures was measured. Strains were diluted with fresh media to reach the final OD600 from 0.8 to 1.1. Before the fluorescence measurements, cell cultures were grown for 3 hours at 30°C and 200 RPM in the shaker incubator.
All the media used for different strains are listed in Table 2.
Table 2. Media used for cell growth
Strain | Medium | Carbon source |
ura3-1::pRS306-URA3 | CSM | 2% glucose |
ura3-1::pRS306-pTDH3-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 | CSM | 2% glucose |
ura3-1::pRS306 pRNR1-EGFP-tCYC1-URA3 | CSM | 2% glucose |
After 3 hours of incubation, 200 µL of each strain culture was transferred into a 96-well plate (clear flat bottom). Two biological replicates (two different positive colonies after transformation) of each genotype were taken in four technical replicates for fluorescence measurements. For the fluorescence measurement, we have used BioTek Synergy MX microplate reader with the following setup: excitation 485 nm, emission 528 nm, bandwidth 20, gain 80. Alone with fluorescence, absorbance at 600 nm was measured (with disabled pathlength correction). CSM medium was used as a blank for OD600 measurements. Fluorescein was used as a reference (according to the protocol of 2018 iGEM InterLab Study) to quantify GFP fluorescence intensity. However, in our case, the standard curve for fluorescein concentrations in the range from 0.0012 to 0.313 µM was generated, in contrast to the InterLab Study, where 10 µM of fluorescein was the highest concentration. Since we used a higher gain parameter in our experiment, fluorescein concentrations above 0.313 µM showed intensities that were above the detection limit of our device.
Results
EGFP was cloned under target promoter and constructs were transformed into yeast cells. The intensity of GFP fluorescence was taken as a measure of promoter strength. As can be seen from Figure 1, EGFP under pRNR1 showed 40% higher fluorescence in comparison to a positive control (pTDH3-EGFP).
Figure 1.