Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K3128027:Experience"
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<i>pOT25</i> contains '''OmpX gene fused to the T25 subpart'''. It has a kanamycin resistant gene and the p15A replication origin.<br> | <i>pOT25</i> contains '''OmpX gene fused to the T25 subpart'''. It has a kanamycin resistant gene and the p15A replication origin.<br> | ||
<i>pOT25</i> contains [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3128018 OmpX WT protein fused with T25 subpart of Bordetella Pertussis AC under constitutive promoter].<br> | <i>pOT25</i> contains [https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K3128018 OmpX WT protein fused with T25 subpart of Bordetella Pertussis AC under constitutive promoter].<br> | ||
− | '''Those constructs will | + | '''Those constructs will constitute the negative condition that will reveal the background noise of the initial mBACTH system.'''<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
<i>pOT25-ZIP</i> is similar to <i>pOT25</i> with the addition of a '''leucine-zipper''' sequence between the '''OmpX signal peptide''' and the '''OmpX gene'''. <br> | <i>pOT25-ZIP</i> is similar to <i>pOT25</i> with the addition of a '''leucine-zipper''' sequence between the '''OmpX signal peptide''' and the '''OmpX gene'''. <br> | ||
<i>pOT25-ZIP</i> contains [https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K3128027 OmpX WT protein fused with LZ and T25 subpart of Bordetella Pertussis AC under constitutive promoter].<br> | <i>pOT25-ZIP</i> contains [https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K3128027 OmpX WT protein fused with LZ and T25 subpart of Bordetella Pertussis AC under constitutive promoter].<br> | ||
− | '''Those constructs will | + | '''Those constructs will constitute the positive condition that will reveal how the signal increases when both sub-parts are brought together with the mBACTH.'''<br> |
https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/thumb/f/f9/T--Grenoble-Alpes--mBACTH_plamides.png/800px-T--Grenoble-Alpes--mBACTH_plamides.png | https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/thumb/f/f9/T--Grenoble-Alpes--mBACTH_plamides.png/800px-T--Grenoble-Alpes--mBACTH_plamides.png | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
===The assay=== | ===The assay=== | ||
<div style="text-align:justify;"> | <div style="text-align:justify;"> | ||
− | To make sure that the '''OmpX-T18''' and '''OmpX-T25''' are expressed in the external membrane, '''OmpX''' proteins have been muted to be able to integrate an unnatural amino acid in one of their extracellular loops by implementing the amber stop codon TAG. | + | To make sure that the '''OmpX-T18''' and '''OmpX-T25''' are expressed in the external membrane, '''OmpX''' fusion proteins have been muted to be able to integrate an unnatural amino acid in one of their extracellular loops by implementing the amber stop codon TAG. |
− | A specific tRNA can then add | + | A specific tRNA can then add an azido-modified amino acid to the protein, these modified proteins are called '''COMPs'''.<br> |
− | COMPs are fused with T18 or T25 subparts and have to be expressed at the external membrane of the bacteria. To ensure this, | + | The azido group of the protein reacts with a DIBO group which process allows to click extracellular DIBO functionnalized biosensor to the protein. <br> |
− | microscopy observations have been done with | + | COMPs are fused with T18 or T25 subparts and have to be expressed at the external membrane of the bacteria.<br> |
− | ''' | + | To ensure this, microscopy observations have been done with an '''Dalexia 488''' conjugated '''DIBO''' group. <br> |
+ | '''Fluorescent microscopy observations of the COMP, COMP-T18 and COMP-T25 clickable proteins show surface labelled bacteria indicating that a the recombinante proteins are expressed at the external membrane of <i>E. coli.</i> '''<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | The bioluminescence intensity produced by the NanoLuciferase enzyme is | + | The bioluminescence intensity produced by the NanoLuciferase enzyme is determined.<br> |
− | Several conditions are tested | + | Several experimental conditions are tested using decreasing amount of bacterial culture (100µL, 25µL, 5µL and 1µL) at OD600nm = 0.6 : respectively 48E+06 CFU, 12E+06 CFU, 24E+05 CFU and 48E+04 CFU .<br> |
In addition, times of induction are tested <u>from 0 to 360 minutes with 30 minutes increments</u>.<br> | In addition, times of induction are tested <u>from 0 to 360 minutes with 30 minutes increments</u>.<br> | ||
Cultures of the different recombinant bacteria are incubated overnight at 18°C under shaking in order to induce an optimal COMPs proteins production [http://2015.igem.org/Team:TU_Eindhoven cf Team Eindhoven 2015].<br> | Cultures of the different recombinant bacteria are incubated overnight at 18°C under shaking in order to induce an optimal COMPs proteins production [http://2015.igem.org/Team:TU_Eindhoven cf Team Eindhoven 2015].<br> | ||
Line 51: | Line 52: | ||
The induction is performed by addition of '''0,5 mM IPTG''' and '''2mM of ATP''' for different periods of time. Bacteria are incubated at '''37°C''' under shaking (180 rpm) to allow an optimal '''NanoLuciferase production'''.<br> | The induction is performed by addition of '''0,5 mM IPTG''' and '''2mM of ATP''' for different periods of time. Bacteria are incubated at '''37°C''' under shaking (180 rpm) to allow an optimal '''NanoLuciferase production'''.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | After induction, 1, 5, 25 or 100µL of bacteria are distributed in a 96 wells black NUNC plate (ThermoFisher) the Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay assay from Promega® is performed [https://france.promega.com/products/reporter-assays-and-transfection/reporter-assays/nano_glo-luciferase-assay-system/?catNum=N1110 (More informations)] : <br> | + | After induction, 1, 5, 25 or 100µL of bacteria are distributed in a 96 wells black NUNC plate (ThermoFisher) and the Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay assay from Promega® is performed [https://france.promega.com/products/reporter-assays-and-transfection/reporter-assays/nano_glo-luciferase-assay-system/?catNum=N1110 (More informations)] : <br> |
“Prepare the desired amount of reconstituted Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay Reagent by combining one volume of Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay Substrate with 50 volumes of Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay Buffer.For example, if the experiment requires 10 mL of reagent, add 200μl of substrate to 10 mL of buffer.”<br> | “Prepare the desired amount of reconstituted Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay Reagent by combining one volume of Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay Substrate with 50 volumes of Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay Buffer.For example, if the experiment requires 10 mL of reagent, add 200μl of substrate to 10 mL of buffer.”<br> | ||
− | + | Then the amount of bioluminescence is measured using a luminometer by recording Relative Luminescence Units (RLU).<br> | |
<br> | <br> | ||
− | Several measures are made in the same well in order to reduce | + | Several measures are made in the same well in order to reduce incertitude induced by the luminometer.<br> |
− | In order to test the '''reproducibility''' of our measures the means of '''3 differents experiments''' with '''3 measurements per well''' are | + | In order to test the '''reproducibility''' of our measures the means of '''3 differents experiments''' with '''3 measurements per well''' are calculated. <br> |
+ | Data are expressed as the mean +/- standard deviation.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
'''Several controls are performed''':<br> | '''Several controls are performed''':<br> | ||
'''∅ IPTG, ∅ ATP''' : To check the promoter leakage without any induction.<br> | '''∅ IPTG, ∅ ATP''' : To check the promoter leakage without any induction.<br> | ||
'''∅ IPTG, 2 mM ATP''' :To check if the addition of extracellular ATP helps the production of cAMP and to check if addition of ATP modifies the promoter leakage.<br> | '''∅ IPTG, 2 mM ATP''' :To check if the addition of extracellular ATP helps the production of cAMP and to check if addition of ATP modifies the promoter leakage.<br> | ||
− | '''0 | + | '''0.5 mM IPTG, ∅ ATP''' : To check if adding extracellular ATP is needed for protein expression.<br> |
− | '''0 | + | '''0.5 mM IPTG, 2 mM ATP''' : Is the experimental condition, it correspond to the measure at 360min.<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | |||
==Results== | ==Results== | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
The '''mBACTH''' following results are obtained with '''5µL''' of bacteria at OD600nm = 0.6 : '''24E+05 CFU'''.<br> | The '''mBACTH''' following results are obtained with '''5µL''' of bacteria at OD600nm = 0.6 : '''24E+05 CFU'''.<br> | ||
<i>With 1µL (48E+04 CFU), the bioluminescence intensity was too low and the measurement were not discriminant enough.<br> | <i>With 1µL (48E+04 CFU), the bioluminescence intensity was too low and the measurement were not discriminant enough.<br> | ||
− | Above 25µL of bacteria (12E+06 CFU), the signal was quickly saturated when the induction time increased and the luminometer could not | + | Above 25µL of bacteria (12E+06 CFU), the signal was quickly saturated when the induction time increased and the luminometer could not record workable measures.<br> |
− | 5µL (24E+05 CFU) is a good compromise, it’s enough to have a discriminant signal and sensitive enough to work as a small drop in our NeuroDrop | + | 5µL (24E+05 CFU) is a good compromise, it’s enough to have a discriminant signal and sensitive enough to work as a small drop in our NeuroDrop device.<br> |
− | iGEM Grenoble-Alpes device NeuroDrop is designed for the use of small volumes like drops. | + | iGEM Grenoble-Alpes device NeuroDrop is designed for the use of small volumes of biological sample like drops. |
− | Proving that 5µL of bacteria are enough to detect a significant difference in bioluminescence intensity between negative and positive | + | Proving that 5µL of bacteria are enough to detect a significant difference in bioluminescence intensity between negative and positive conditions result was a challenge that we have overcome. |
− | Other reagents (see the full system) will be added to the drop of bacteria and its volume should not exceed | + | Other reagents (see the full system) will be added to the drop of bacteria and its volume should not exceed 20µLworkto allow its automatic moving on the surface of the device.</i><br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/7/77/T--Grenoble-Alpes--mBACTH_Table_1.png <br> | https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/7/77/T--Grenoble-Alpes--mBACTH_Table_1.png <br> | ||
<i> Means of measurements obtained through 3 differents experiments with 3 measurements per well for each condition of the mBACTH generated with either <br> | <i> Means of measurements obtained through 3 differents experiments with 3 measurements per well for each condition of the mBACTH generated with either <br> | ||
− | BBa_K3128018 and BBa_K3128017 : ''' | + | BBa_K3128018 and BBa_K3128017 : '''AC sub-parts fused to OmpX : negative condition''',<br> |
− | or BBa_K3128026 and BBa_K3128027 : '''Leucine Zipper : positive condition'''.<br> | + | or BBa_K3128026 and BBa_K3128027 : '''Leucine Zipper mediated reconstitution of AC : positive condition'''.<br> |
− | Blank was done with 24E+05 CFU of untransformed BTH101 (RLU = 300) and subtracted | + | Blank was done with 24E+05 CFU of untransformed BTH101 (RLU = 300) and subtracted to each measurements.</i><br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
− | + | Using positive control strain, we measured '''1.48E+06 RLU''' of bioluminescence produced in the '''0.5 mM IPTG''' condition compared to '''9.02E+05''' in the condition '''without IPTG and without ATP''', indicating that <u>IPTG increase slightly the transcription</u>.<br> | |
− | Additionally, with '''2 | + | Additionally, with '''2.55E+0,6 RLU''' of bioluminescence produced in the condition''' without IPTG and 2mM ATP''' condition compared to '''9.02E+05''' in the '''without IPTG and without ATP condition''', it seems that <u>ATP have a '''significant*''' effect on transcription</u>. <br> |
This was expected because of the lack of ATP in the periplasm of the bacteria. Thereby, <u>adding a great amount of ATP in the medium able to diffuse in the periplasm help the cAMP production by the periplasmic adenylate cyclase</u>.<br> | This was expected because of the lack of ATP in the periplasm of the bacteria. Thereby, <u>adding a great amount of ATP in the medium able to diffuse in the periplasm help the cAMP production by the periplasmic adenylate cyclase</u>.<br> | ||
− | Obviously, those observations | + | Obviously, those observations do not prove anything but give clues on the way the system operates. <br> |
<i>* A T test was done for the values of time above 90 min and led to a p-value below 0.01.</i><br> | <i>* A T test was done for the values of time above 90 min and led to a p-value below 0.01.</i><br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/thumb/7/72/T--Grenoble-Alpes--mBACTH_Graph_1.png/800px-T--Grenoble-Alpes--mBACTH_Graph_1.png <br> | https://2019.igem.org/wiki/images/thumb/7/72/T--Grenoble-Alpes--mBACTH_Graph_1.png/800px-T--Grenoble-Alpes--mBACTH_Graph_1.png <br> | ||
− | <i>Luminescence production over time of induction for the '''negative condition strain (red curve)''' and the '''positive condition strain of the mBACTH assay (blue curve)'''.<br> | + | <i><i>Luminescence production over time of induction for the '''negative condition strain (red curve)''' and the '''positive condition strain of the mBACTH assay (blue curve)'''.<br> |
Area of the '''significant*''' difference between both curves is highlighted in yellow. <br> | Area of the '''significant*''' difference between both curves is highlighted in yellow. <br> | ||
− | Blank was done with 24E+05 CFU of untransformed BTH101 (RLU = 300) and subtracted | + | Blank was done with 24E+05 CFU of untransformed BTH101 (RLU = 300) and subtracted to each measurements.<br></i> |
<i>* A T test was done for the values of time above 210 min and led to a p-value below 0.05.<br></i> | <i>* A T test was done for the values of time above 210 min and led to a p-value below 0.05.<br></i> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Line 95: | Line 98: | ||
At '''120 minutes''', the <u>two curves start to split</u> and give rise to a <u>significant difference</u> between the free sub-parts : negative condition and the Leucine Zipper: positive condition from around '''210 minutes'''.<br> | At '''120 minutes''', the <u>two curves start to split</u> and give rise to a <u>significant difference</u> between the free sub-parts : negative condition and the Leucine Zipper: positive condition from around '''210 minutes'''.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
− | The discrepancy keeps increasing upon | + | The discrepancy keeps increasing upon time of induction, thus highlighting the efficiency of the '''amplification signal''' thanks to the signalling cascade and the strong reporter gene.<br> |
<u>From 0 to 120 minutes</u> of induction time, the <u>bioluminescence produced by the two strains is similar</u>. <br> | <u>From 0 to 120 minutes</u> of induction time, the <u>bioluminescence produced by the two strains is similar</u>. <br> | ||
− | At '''120 minutes''', the <u>two curves start to split</u> and give rise to a <u>significant difference</u> between the | + | At '''120 minutes''', the <u>two curves start to split</u> and give rise to a <u>significant difference</u> between the two strains from around '''210 minutes''' the negative condition strain compared to the Leucine Zipper_positive condition .<br> |
<br> | <br> | ||
The discrepancy keeps increasing upon induction time, thus highlighting the efficiency of the '''amplification signal''' thanks to the signalling cascade and the strong reporter gene.<br> | The discrepancy keeps increasing upon induction time, thus highlighting the efficiency of the '''amplification signal''' thanks to the signalling cascade and the strong reporter gene.<br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
+ | |||
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
'''There is a <u>significant difference between the negative and the positive condition of the mBACTH assay</u>''', <br> | '''There is a <u>significant difference between the negative and the positive condition of the mBACTH assay</u>''', <br> | ||
Line 108: | Line 112: | ||
==User Reviews== | ==User Reviews== | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
<!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K3128027 StartReviews</partinfo> | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K3128027 StartReviews</partinfo> | ||
<!-- Template for a user review | <!-- Template for a user review | ||
Line 134: | Line 123: | ||
|}; | |}; | ||
<!-- End of the user review template --> | <!-- End of the user review template --> | ||
− | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo> | + | <!-- DON'T DELETE --><partinfo>BBa_K3128017 EndReviews</partinfo> |
Revision as of 20:28, 12 October 2019
Contents
Team Grenoble-Alpes 2019
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strain
The assays are made with streptomycin resistant BTH101 E.Coli strain, which are cya- bacteria.
In this strain, the endogenous adenylate cyclase gene has been deleted in order to obtain a bacterium that is unable to produce endogenous cAMP,
thus avoiding the presence of potential false positives and making the system more sensitive.
Design of the plasmids
For the mBACTH, as three biobricks have to be inserted in the bacterium to constitute the entire system, genetic constructions have been made in order to co-transform only two compatible plasmids:
pOT18-Nlc contains OmpX gene fused to the T18 sub-part and the NanoLuciferase gene under the control of the plac promoter; it has an ampicillin resistant gene and the pMB1 replication origin.
pOT18-Nlc contains NanoLuciferase reporter for BACTH assay and OmpX WT protein fused with T18 subpart of Bordetella Pertussis AC under constitutive promoter.
pOT25 contains OmpX gene fused to the T25 subpart. It has a kanamycin resistant gene and the p15A replication origin.
pOT25 contains OmpX WT protein fused with T25 subpart of Bordetella Pertussis AC under constitutive promoter.
Those constructs will constitute the negative condition that will reveal the background noise of the initial mBACTH system.
pOT18-Nlc-ZIP is similar to pOT18-Nlc with the addition of a leucine-zipper sequence between the OmpX signal peptide and the OmpX gene.
pOT18-Nlc-ZIP contains NanoLuciferase reporter for BACTH assay and OmpX WT protein fused with LZ and T18 subpart of Bordetella Pertussis AC under constitutive promoter.
pOT25-ZIP is similar to pOT25 with the addition of a leucine-zipper sequence between the OmpX signal peptide and the OmpX gene.
pOT25-ZIP contains OmpX WT protein fused with LZ and T25 subpart of Bordetella Pertussis AC under constitutive promoter.
Those constructs will constitute the positive condition that will reveal how the signal increases when both sub-parts are brought together with the mBACTH.
Transformation
For the assay with the membrane BACTH, BTH101 are co-transformed either with pOT18-Nlc and pOT25 plasmids : negative condition,
or pOT18-Nlc-ZIP and pOT25-ZIP plasmids : positive condition.
The assay
To make sure that the OmpX-T18 and OmpX-T25 are expressed in the external membrane, OmpX fusion proteins have been muted to be able to integrate an unnatural amino acid in one of their extracellular loops by implementing the amber stop codon TAG.
A specific tRNA can then add an azido-modified amino acid to the protein, these modified proteins are called COMPs.
The azido group of the protein reacts with a DIBO group which process allows to click extracellular DIBO functionnalized biosensor to the protein.
COMPs are fused with T18 or T25 subparts and have to be expressed at the external membrane of the bacteria.
To ensure this, microscopy observations have been done with an Dalexia 488 conjugated DIBO group.
Fluorescent microscopy observations of the COMP, COMP-T18 and COMP-T25 clickable proteins show surface labelled bacteria indicating that a the recombinante proteins are expressed at the external membrane of E. coli.
The bioluminescence intensity produced by the NanoLuciferase enzyme is determined.
Several experimental conditions are tested using decreasing amount of bacterial culture (100µL, 25µL, 5µL and 1µL) at OD600nm = 0.6 : respectively 48E+06 CFU, 12E+06 CFU, 24E+05 CFU and 48E+04 CFU .
In addition, times of induction are tested from 0 to 360 minutes with 30 minutes increments.
Cultures of the different recombinant bacteria are incubated overnight at 18°C under shaking in order to induce an optimal COMPs proteins production [http://2015.igem.org/Team:TU_Eindhoven cf Team Eindhoven 2015].
The low temperature allows a native protein folding and membrane insertion to avoids as much as possible the formation of inclusion bodies.
Then cultures are diluted at OD600nm = 0,4 and let to grow to OD 600nm = 0.6 before induction.
The induction is performed by addition of 0,5 mM IPTG and 2mM of ATP for different periods of time. Bacteria are incubated at 37°C under shaking (180 rpm) to allow an optimal NanoLuciferase production.
After induction, 1, 5, 25 or 100µL of bacteria are distributed in a 96 wells black NUNC plate (ThermoFisher) and the Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay assay from Promega® is performed (More informations) :
“Prepare the desired amount of reconstituted Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay Reagent by combining one volume of Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay Substrate with 50 volumes of Nano-Glo® Luciferase Assay Buffer.For example, if the experiment requires 10 mL of reagent, add 200μl of substrate to 10 mL of buffer.”
Then the amount of bioluminescence is measured using a luminometer by recording Relative Luminescence Units (RLU).
Several measures are made in the same well in order to reduce incertitude induced by the luminometer.
In order to test the reproducibility of our measures the means of 3 differents experiments with 3 measurements per well are calculated.
Data are expressed as the mean +/- standard deviation.
Several controls are performed:
∅ IPTG, ∅ ATP : To check the promoter leakage without any induction.
∅ IPTG, 2 mM ATP :To check if the addition of extracellular ATP helps the production of cAMP and to check if addition of ATP modifies the promoter leakage.
0.5 mM IPTG, ∅ ATP : To check if adding extracellular ATP is needed for protein expression.
0.5 mM IPTG, 2 mM ATP : Is the experimental condition, it correspond to the measure at 360min.
Results
The mBACTH following results are obtained with 5µL of bacteria at OD600nm = 0.6 : 24E+05 CFU.
With 1µL (48E+04 CFU), the bioluminescence intensity was too low and the measurement were not discriminant enough.
Above 25µL of bacteria (12E+06 CFU), the signal was quickly saturated when the induction time increased and the luminometer could not record workable measures.
5µL (24E+05 CFU) is a good compromise, it’s enough to have a discriminant signal and sensitive enough to work as a small drop in our NeuroDrop device.
iGEM Grenoble-Alpes device NeuroDrop is designed for the use of small volumes of biological sample like drops.
Proving that 5µL of bacteria are enough to detect a significant difference in bioluminescence intensity between negative and positive conditions result was a challenge that we have overcome.
Other reagents (see the full system) will be added to the drop of bacteria and its volume should not exceed 20µLworkto allow its automatic moving on the surface of the device.
Means of measurements obtained through 3 differents experiments with 3 measurements per well for each condition of the mBACTH generated with either
BBa_K3128018 and BBa_K3128017 : AC sub-parts fused to OmpX : negative condition,
or BBa_K3128026 and BBa_K3128027 : Leucine Zipper mediated reconstitution of AC : positive condition.
Blank was done with 24E+05 CFU of untransformed BTH101 (RLU = 300) and subtracted to each measurements.
Using positive control strain, we measured 1.48E+06 RLU of bioluminescence produced in the 0.5 mM IPTG condition compared to 9.02E+05 in the condition without IPTG and without ATP, indicating that IPTG increase slightly the transcription.
Additionally, with 2.55E+0,6 RLU of bioluminescence produced in the condition without IPTG and 2mM ATP condition compared to 9.02E+05 in the without IPTG and without ATP condition, it seems that ATP have a significant* effect on transcription.
This was expected because of the lack of ATP in the periplasm of the bacteria. Thereby, adding a great amount of ATP in the medium able to diffuse in the periplasm help the cAMP production by the periplasmic adenylate cyclase.
Obviously, those observations do not prove anything but give clues on the way the system operates.
* A T test was done for the values of time above 90 min and led to a p-value below 0.01.
<i>Luminescence production over time of induction for the negative condition strain (red curve) and the positive condition strain of the mBACTH assay (blue curve).
Area of the significant* difference between both curves is highlighted in yellow.
Blank was done with 24E+05 CFU of untransformed BTH101 (RLU = 300) and subtracted to each measurements.
* A T test was done for the values of time above 210 min and led to a p-value below 0.05.
From 0 to 120 minutes of induction time, the bioluminescence produced by the two strains is similar.
At 120 minutes, the two curves start to split and give rise to a significant difference between the free sub-parts : negative condition and the Leucine Zipper: positive condition from around 210 minutes.
The discrepancy keeps increasing upon time of induction, thus highlighting the efficiency of the amplification signal thanks to the signalling cascade and the strong reporter gene.
From 0 to 120 minutes of induction time, the bioluminescence produced by the two strains is similar.
At 120 minutes, the two curves start to split and give rise to a significant difference between the two strains from around 210 minutes the negative condition strain compared to the Leucine Zipper_positive condition .
The discrepancy keeps increasing upon induction time, thus highlighting the efficiency of the amplification signal thanks to the signalling cascade and the strong reporter gene.
Conclusion
There is a significant difference between the negative and the positive condition of the mBACTH assay,
suggesting that a Bacterial Adenylate Cyclase Two-Hybrid can be successfully performed in the periplasm of bacteria which property is required for the sensing and detection of extracellular molecules.
User Reviews
UNIQb0d17767e2eefc7a-partinfo-00000000-QINU
UNIQb0d17767e2eefc7a-partinfo-00000001-QINU