Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2819103"
NandaNuoen (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
| − | <partinfo> | + | <partinfo>BBa_K3198004 short</partinfo> |
| − | + | Team iGEM 18 NUS Singapore-A submitted BBa_K2819103 which is a Blue light-repressible system with RFP reporter attached with YbaQ degradation tag. | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | |
| + | <partinfo>BBa_K3198001 SequenceAndFeatures</partinfo> | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | ===Usage=== | |
| + | This part contains a promoter that can be repressed by blue light (450nm). This promoter makes use of a blue light dependent DNA-binding protein, EL222. Irradiation by blue light of wavelength 450nm exposes the hitherto sequestered HTH, facilitating dimerization of EL222 and subsequent DNA binding. The repression is achieved by placing the DNA binding site of EL222 between the -35 and -10 hexamers of the consensus promoter in E. coli, creating the blue light repressible promoter PBLrep. As a result, EL222 acts as a repressor, blocking the binding of RNA polymerase and repress gene expression in the presence of blue light. In the dark, RNA polymerase can now bind, and gene expression takes place. | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | ===Biology=== | |
| + | Originating from the marine bacterium <i>Erythrobacter litoralis</i> HTCC2594, EL222 is a photosensitive DNA binding protein, with a N-terminal light-oxygen-voltage (LOV) domain and a C-terminal helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA binding domain. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | ===Improvement over existing part <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2819103">BBa_K2819103</a>=== | |
| + | While many teams have previously characterized blue-light repressible systems, there are not many investigations done on the potential effect of spacer DNA behind the promoter on protein expression. The part BBa K2819103 by iGEM18_NUS Singapore-A had an 11 base pair long spacer DNA behind the blue-light repressible promoter. This year, we constructed two different new plasmids. One of them had an increased spacer DNA sequence with 30 base pairs, while the other one had the spacer sequence removed completely. Our aim was to investigate how the length of this spacer DNA would affect the performance of the blue-light repressible system. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | ===Characterization=== | |
| − | + | The three types of plasmid were transformed into <i>E. coli MG1655</i> strain for characterization. For simplicity, the three types of cells are referred to as 0bp, 11bp and 30bp. | |
| − | < | + | 50uL of overnight culture of 0bp 11bp and 30 bp MG1655 cells were transferred into 5mL LB+Chloramphenicol medium in three 50mL tubes. They were then refreshed to a starting culture and incubated for one and a half hours until OD reaches about 0.8 to start characterization. |
| − | + | <br><br>12 well plates were used for characterization. The plate layouts are the same for both plates. | |
| − | + | Plate layout: first column: triplicate of 0bp MG1655, second column: triplicate of 11bp MG1655, third column: triplicate of 30bp MG1655, last column, triplicate of blank LB medium. Picture to be uploaded | |
| − | + | <br><br>picture | |
| − | + | <br><br>1mL of each cell and medium culture were transferred into each well in the 12 well plates. Initial OD and RFP readings were taken at 0h time point using H1 Synergy microplate reader. The protocol: shaking for 10s, read OD, then read RFP. The results are exported as excel. For subsequent readings, the protocol is the same throughout and all results are exported in the excel sheet. | |
| − | + | <br><br>After the first reading, 1 plate was placed on the blue light device to be exposed to blue light, while the other plate is covered with a black cloth to prevent any exposure to light. Both are incubated in a small shaking incubator at 37 degrees and shaking for 125rpm. Hourly readings were performed for the next 8h. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | ===Results=== | |
| − | < | + | figures |
| + | <br><br>Generally, there is no significant difference between the OD curves of cells in the dark and blue light condition. However, we noticed that under both Dark and Blue light conditions, the cells with a plasmid containing 30 base pair spacer DNA sequence grew faster and reached a higher final OD as compared to 11bp and 0bp. | ||
| + | <br><br>figures | ||
| + | <br><br>We observed that the blue-light repressible system was working well. For cells incubated in the blue light environment, we could see that their RFP production decreased significantly over time while the cells incubated in the dark had an increasing RFP production. It is clear that cells containing the plasmid with 30 base pair spacer DNA had the highest RFP production overtime. The RFP production of this new construct is 3.8 fold as compared to the original construct(11 base pair). However, the cells with their spacer DNA completely removed(0 base pair) did not seem to produce RFP at all. Therefore, we can conclude that increasing the spacer DNA length behind the blue-light repressible promoter increases the RFP production while decreasing the spacer DNA reduces RFP production. | ||
| + | <br><br>figures | ||
| + | <br><br>Taking into account of cell density, we also plotted the RFP/OD curve. Our conclusion is clearly supported by these curves as well, with a longer spacer DNA sequence demonstrating a much larger fold change between production and repression of proteins. This therefore indicates that a larger spacer sequence would result in a more effective blue-light repressible system. | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | <!-- --> | |
| − | + | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
<!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display | <!-- Uncomment this to enable Functional Parameter display | ||
===Functional Parameters=== | ===Functional Parameters=== | ||
| − | <partinfo> | + | <partinfo>BBa_K3198001 parameters</partinfo> |
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
Revision as of 10:30, 31 August 2019
Blue light repressible promoter with spacer addition
Team iGEM 18 NUS Singapore-A submitted BBa_K2819103 which is a Blue light-repressible system with RFP reporter attached with YbaQ degradation tag.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI site found at 48
Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 88
Usage
This part contains a promoter that can be repressed by blue light (450nm). This promoter makes use of a blue light dependent DNA-binding protein, EL222. Irradiation by blue light of wavelength 450nm exposes the hitherto sequestered HTH, facilitating dimerization of EL222 and subsequent DNA binding. The repression is achieved by placing the DNA binding site of EL222 between the -35 and -10 hexamers of the consensus promoter in E. coli, creating the blue light repressible promoter PBLrep. As a result, EL222 acts as a repressor, blocking the binding of RNA polymerase and repress gene expression in the presence of blue light. In the dark, RNA polymerase can now bind, and gene expression takes place.
Biology
Originating from the marine bacterium Erythrobacter litoralis HTCC2594, EL222 is a photosensitive DNA binding protein, with a N-terminal light-oxygen-voltage (LOV) domain and a C-terminal helix-turn-helix (HTH) DNA binding domain.
Improvement over existing part <a href="https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2819103">BBa_K2819103</a>
While many teams have previously characterized blue-light repressible systems, there are not many investigations done on the potential effect of spacer DNA behind the promoter on protein expression. The part BBa K2819103 by iGEM18_NUS Singapore-A had an 11 base pair long spacer DNA behind the blue-light repressible promoter. This year, we constructed two different new plasmids. One of them had an increased spacer DNA sequence with 30 base pairs, while the other one had the spacer sequence removed completely. Our aim was to investigate how the length of this spacer DNA would affect the performance of the blue-light repressible system.
Characterization
The three types of plasmid were transformed into E. coli MG1655 strain for characterization. For simplicity, the three types of cells are referred to as 0bp, 11bp and 30bp.
50uL of overnight culture of 0bp 11bp and 30 bp MG1655 cells were transferred into 5mL LB+Chloramphenicol medium in three 50mL tubes. They were then refreshed to a starting culture and incubated for one and a half hours until OD reaches about 0.8 to start characterization.
12 well plates were used for characterization. The plate layouts are the same for both plates.
Plate layout: first column: triplicate of 0bp MG1655, second column: triplicate of 11bp MG1655, third column: triplicate of 30bp MG1655, last column, triplicate of blank LB medium. Picture to be uploaded
picture
1mL of each cell and medium culture were transferred into each well in the 12 well plates. Initial OD and RFP readings were taken at 0h time point using H1 Synergy microplate reader. The protocol: shaking for 10s, read OD, then read RFP. The results are exported as excel. For subsequent readings, the protocol is the same throughout and all results are exported in the excel sheet.
After the first reading, 1 plate was placed on the blue light device to be exposed to blue light, while the other plate is covered with a black cloth to prevent any exposure to light. Both are incubated in a small shaking incubator at 37 degrees and shaking for 125rpm. Hourly readings were performed for the next 8h.
Results
figures
Generally, there is no significant difference between the OD curves of cells in the dark and blue light condition. However, we noticed that under both Dark and Blue light conditions, the cells with a plasmid containing 30 base pair spacer DNA sequence grew faster and reached a higher final OD as compared to 11bp and 0bp.
figures
We observed that the blue-light repressible system was working well. For cells incubated in the blue light environment, we could see that their RFP production decreased significantly over time while the cells incubated in the dark had an increasing RFP production. It is clear that cells containing the plasmid with 30 base pair spacer DNA had the highest RFP production overtime. The RFP production of this new construct is 3.8 fold as compared to the original construct(11 base pair). However, the cells with their spacer DNA completely removed(0 base pair) did not seem to produce RFP at all. Therefore, we can conclude that increasing the spacer DNA length behind the blue-light repressible promoter increases the RFP production while decreasing the spacer DNA reduces RFP production.
figures
Taking into account of cell density, we also plotted the RFP/OD curve. Our conclusion is clearly supported by these curves as well, with a longer spacer DNA sequence demonstrating a much larger fold change between production and repression of proteins. This therefore indicates that a larger spacer sequence would result in a more effective blue-light repressible system.