Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2982002:Design"

 
(References)
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
===References===
 
===References===
 +
Joo, S., Cho, I. J., Seo, H., Son, H. F., Sagong, H., Shin, T. J., . . . Kim, K. (2018). Structural insight into molecular mechanism of poly(ethylene terephthalate) degradation. Nature Communications, 9(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02881-1

Revision as of 12:54, 3 August 2019


Coding sequence for S245I/R280L IsPETase double mutant


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
    Illegal XbaI site found at 348
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 304
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
    Illegal XbaI site found at 348
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal XbaI site found at 348
    Illegal AgeI site found at 627
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Design Notes

The mutation sites locate in substrate binding site, subsite II where three MHET moieties are bound through hydrophobic interaction. In TfCut2, Isoleucine 253 residues and Leucine 288 are located at the corresponding positions of Serine 245 and Arginine 280 in subsite II of IsPETase. The resulting double mutant makes the substrate binding site, subunit II more cutinase-like and increases the hydrophobic property of the enzyme.


Source

Modified from wild type IsPETase sequence from 'Structural Insight into Molecular Mechanism of Poly (ethylene terephthalate) Degradation', Nature Communication, 2018.

References

Joo, S., Cho, I. J., Seo, H., Son, H. F., Sagong, H., Shin, T. J., . . . Kim, K. (2018). Structural insight into molecular mechanism of poly(ethylene terephthalate) degradation. Nature Communications, 9(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02881-1