Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2684004"
 
Line 29: Line 29:
 
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/57/T--SHSBNU_China--21002.jpg" style="width:50%"/></image></p>
 
<p><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2018/5/57/T--SHSBNU_China--21002.jpg" style="width:50%"/></image></p>
 
Link: Protocol for <a href="http://2018.igem.org/Team:SHSBNU_China/Protocal#SSS">SpyTag-SpyCatcher</a> system verification
 
Link: Protocol for <a href="http://2018.igem.org/Team:SHSBNU_China/Protocal#SSS">SpyTag-SpyCatcher</a> system verification
 +
 +
<br><br>
 +
For more experimental details, please visit http://2018.igem.org/Team:SHSBNU_China/Experiments
 
</p>
 
</p>
 
</body>
 
</body>
 
</html>
 
</html>

Latest revision as of 21:24, 17 October 2018


SpyCatcher-sfGFP

SpyCatcher fused with sfGFP by 2xGGGGS linker

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
    Illegal XhoI site found at 514
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal SapI.rc site found at 568


Usage and Biology

Reaction stock leftover in experiment

Using sfGFP–spycatcher protein, the combing function of Spytag and spycatcher system on the biofilm was tested. Gene csgA on the plasmid of pET28a was transferred in to ΔMG1655 as control group. Gene csgA – Spytag on the plasmid of pET28a was transferred in to ΔMG1655 as experiment. To verify the function of Spytag on csgA, the experiment was design to compare the combing rate of sf-GFP – spycatcher protein with cells that have csgA – SpyTag (Experiment) or csgA (Control).

Link: Protocol for SpyTag-SpyCatcher system verification

For more experimental details, please visit http://2018.igem.org/Team:SHSBNU_China/Experiments