Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2789030"
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
This Figure shows the effect of parts to improve he stability of biofilm (Chl stands for the pathway in PsB1C3, Kan stands for the pathway in Pet 28a). | This Figure shows the effect of parts to improve he stability of biofilm (Chl stands for the pathway in PsB1C3, Kan stands for the pathway in Pet 28a). | ||
− | We use LB and WT bacteria as control. You can see that this part in both two plasmids have a similar results and a decline of shedding rate in 250r.3min condition. Due to the time limit, we didn’t explore the best condition for the expression and adjust the biofilm formation steps to make it work better. However, although we didn’t do this adjustment, it still worked as expect and did improve the stability of biofilm. A further experiment will be done according to this and we believe it can greatly improve the effect! | + | We use LB and WT bacteria as control. You can see that this part in both two plasmids have a similar results and a decline of shedding rate in 250r.3min condition. Due to the time limit, we didn’t explore the best condition for the expression and adjust the biofilm formation steps to make it work better. However, although we didn’t do this adjustment, it still worked as expect and did improve the stability of biofilm. A further experiment will be done according to this and we believe it can greatly improve the effect!<br/> |
Revision as of 14:47, 17 October 2018
Contents
dCBD+OmpA
Similar to K2789024, this part also displays the surface of the protein. Unlike K2789024, this part of the membrane displays a protein called dCBD (double cellulose binding domain), which allows cells to express this cds to adhere to cellulose.In our project, this part also plays a role in connecting bacteria and algae, because the cell wall component of algae is mainly cellulose, so this part can make the bacteria and algae tightly anchor together to make the structure of the symbiotic biofilm more stable.
Function
The instability of biofilm is a big problem in this field currently. This part can improve the stability of symbiotic biofilm of algae and bacteria,
Description
This basic part can be divided into two parts——OmpA is a normal protein that originally expressed in the membrane of bacteria. Generally we can use this protein fused protein with other protein, which process that can express our wanted protein in the membrane. This process is called ”surface display” and another part of this basic part is dCBD (double cellulose binding domain), CBD can bind the cellulose and thus it can bind the cell wall of microalgae
Measurement
We expressed it with OmpA so dCBD can be expressed on the surface of the bacteria. This whole pathway can make our bacteria "stick" to the algae in this way.
To measure how much it can improve the connection between algae and bacteria, we did a series of experiments. Firstly we found the condition of co-culture of bacteria and algae, excluding optimal ratio and culture condition. Then we make it a biofilm by suction filtration method.
In order to test the stability quantitively, we chose shear force as interference after some failed attempts, the shear force has physical Meaning because it plays that interference also in micro-scale directly to the connection between bacteria and algae, compared with that, shaking or pump don’t. Also, the effect of shear force is uniform to biofilm.
We use this device to create proper shear force by adjusting rotating time and speed.
We used shedding rate to determine the stability of biofilm and connection strength between two organisms. We put the biofilm onto the inner wall of the cylinder and start stirring the stirrer. After stirring, Collect algae A that remain on the biofilm and exfoliated algae B. Then count A and B separately. shedding rate “B/(A+B)×100% “can be calculated. The number of each organism was counted by very precise methods——chlorophyll method and hemocytometer Counting method. After a series of standard-establishment experiments, we use 250r/s, 3min as a standard because It can better distinguish the level of biofilm bonding strength.
Result
Then we transformed our pathway into bacteria(We actually assembled the pathway into PsB1C3 and PeT28a separately, since the unit is pathway, there should be no dramatic difference between two experimental results) and made it a biofilm with algae. The stability that it improved can be seen by the figure.
We use LB and WT bacteria as control. You can see that this part in both two plasmids have a similar results and a decline of shedding rate in 250r.3min condition. Due to the time limit, we didn’t explore the best condition for the expression and adjust the biofilm formation steps to make it work better. However, although we didn’t do this adjustment, it still worked as expect and did improve the stability of biofilm. A further experiment will be done according to this and we believe it can greatly improve the effect!
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]Illegal AgeI site found at 307
Illegal AgeI site found at 502 - 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]