Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K516132:Experience"
(→User Reviews) |
(→User Reviews) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<p><br><em><b>SCU-China 2018:</b> | <p><br><em><b>SCU-China 2018:</b> | ||
− | We | + | We used the BBa_K516132 as an original source of the mRFP for our part:spacer J23101-RFP(BBa_K2611003)'https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2611001'. It can work as expectation |
Revision as of 08:14, 17 October 2018
This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter
how you used this part and how it worked out.
Applications of BBa_K516132
User Reviews
UNIPV-Pavia iGEM 2011
NB: unless differently specified, all tests were performed in E. coli MGZ1 in M9 supplemented medium at 37°C in low copy plasmid pSB4C5.
Used to quantify promoter strength (relative to BBa_J23101 with RBS B0034) and the RBS efficiency.
BBa_J23101 is the reference standard promoter for the computation of RPUs. As discussed in 'data analysis' section, RPUs are relative units for the evaluation of promoter strength, based on a mathematical model of the transcription and the translation of a reporter gene. The RPUs are supposed to be indepedent on the experimental setup, provided that the reference standard BBa_J23101 must be assayed in the same experimental condition of the studied promoter. It means that if the studied promoter is in a low copy number plasmid and drives the expression of a reporter protein P, J23101 must be assembled in the same vector upstream of the same reporter P. This approach is in accordance with the philosophy of synthetic biology, based on the concept of 'modularity' of the components. According to this approach, the assembly of basic well characterized modules to build complex circuits allows the prediction of the circuit behavior starting from the knowledge on the basic parts. Salis et al. [Nat Biotec, 2009] stated that 'Identical ribosome binding site sequences in different genetic contexts can result in different protein expression levels' and again 'It is likely that this absence of modularity is caused by the formation of strong secondary structures between the RBS-containing RNA sequence and one protein coding sequence but not another.' For this reason, RPUs might not be reliable when comparing the same promoter with different RBSs because of the un-modularity of the RBS. In order to asses what's the effect of RBS 'un-modularity' on RPUs reliability, we have built a set of four constitutive promoters (BBa_J23101) followed by one of the four RBSs tested. These parts were used to evaluate RBS efficiency. Data were collected and analyzed as described in 'Measurements' and 'Data analysis' sections. RPUs and Synthesis rate per cell [AUr] were computed and results are summarized in the table below. UNIQ288fffc63d4130ce-partinfo-00000005-QINU
SCU-China 2018:
We used the BBa_K516132 as an original source of the mRFP for our part:spacer J23101-RFP(BBa_K2611003)'https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2611001'. It can work as expectation
UNIQ288fffc63d4130ce-partinfo-00000000-QINU
UNIQ288fffc63d4130ce-partinfo-00000001-QINU
UNIQ288fffc63d4130ce-partinfo-00000002-QINU
Characterized together with:
NB: in the RPU computation, the J23101-RBS34-mRFP-TT (BBa_J23101) in low copy plasmid pSB4C5 construct has been considered as the reference standard. With this assumption, RPUs are identical to the estimated RBS efficiency.
J23101 promoter with RBS
Scell
R.P.U.s
RBS30
122 [13.23]
2.45 [0.27]
RBS31
2 [0.25]
0.04 [0.01]
RBS32
20 [1.7]
0.40 [0.03]
RBS34
50 [1.87]
1 [0.02]