Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2686001"
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
A variety of different characterization techniques were used to assess the properties of the encapsulin protein cage. | A variety of different characterization techniques were used to assess the properties of the encapsulin protein cage. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
===Expression=== | ===Expression=== | ||
A cell free expression system was used to synthesize the encapsulin proteins ''in vitro''. The TX-TL cell free system is a robust way to express proteins (Sun et al., 2013), and was used by last year's EPFL iGEM team [[2017.igem.org/Team:EPFL/Description/Lysates| Aptasense]]. | A cell free expression system was used to synthesize the encapsulin proteins ''in vitro''. The TX-TL cell free system is a robust way to express proteins (Sun et al., 2013), and was used by last year's EPFL iGEM team [[2017.igem.org/Team:EPFL/Description/Lysates| Aptasense]]. | ||
Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
[[File:SDS LysBodipy.tiff|thumb|center|upright=3|SDS PAGE of encapsulins expressed in cell free TX-TL system with Lysine-BODIPY fluorescent tRNA's. The two different sets of lanes correspond to different heat denaturation temperatures (70C and 100C for 15 minutes). | [[File:SDS LysBodipy.tiff|thumb|center|upright=3|SDS PAGE of encapsulins expressed in cell free TX-TL system with Lysine-BODIPY fluorescent tRNA's. The two different sets of lanes correspond to different heat denaturation temperatures (70C and 100C for 15 minutes). | ||
From left to right: '''(N)''' Negative control (cell-free PURE expression without DNA and no purification), '''(L)''' Positive control with DNA coding for Luciferase (37kDa), '''(H)''' HexaHistidine Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686002|BBa_K2686002]]) showing bands for the encapsulin multimer high on the gel lanes as well as the monomer around 31kDa, '''(R)''' Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686001|BBa_K2686001]]) without HexaHistidine linker, '''(N)''' Negative control (cell-free PURE expression without DNA and 100C denaturation), '''(Ladder)''' LC5928 BenchMark™ Fluorescent Protein Standard, '''(L)''' Positive control with DNA coding for Luciferase (37kDa), '''(H)''' HexaHis Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686002|BBa_K2686002]]) showing bands for the encapsulin multimer high on the gel lanes as well as the monomer around 31kDa, '''(R)''' Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686001|BBa_K2686001]]) without HexaHistidine linker, '''(N)''' Negative control (cell-free TX-TL expression without DNA and 70C denaturation).]] | From left to right: '''(N)''' Negative control (cell-free PURE expression without DNA and no purification), '''(L)''' Positive control with DNA coding for Luciferase (37kDa), '''(H)''' HexaHistidine Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686002|BBa_K2686002]]) showing bands for the encapsulin multimer high on the gel lanes as well as the monomer around 31kDa, '''(R)''' Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686001|BBa_K2686001]]) without HexaHistidine linker, '''(N)''' Negative control (cell-free PURE expression without DNA and 100C denaturation), '''(Ladder)''' LC5928 BenchMark™ Fluorescent Protein Standard, '''(L)''' Positive control with DNA coding for Luciferase (37kDa), '''(H)''' HexaHis Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686002|BBa_K2686002]]) showing bands for the encapsulin multimer high on the gel lanes as well as the monomer around 31kDa, '''(R)''' Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686001|BBa_K2686001]]) without HexaHistidine linker, '''(N)''' Negative control (cell-free TX-TL expression without DNA and 70C denaturation).]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
===Assembly=== | ===Assembly=== | ||
The self assembly of the encapsulin 60-mer was first examined using SDS PAGE, where a band around 30.71kDa band is expected to form. Additionally due to Encapsulin's exceptional heat stability the 1.98MDa complex also appears on the gel after SDS denaturation. | The self assembly of the encapsulin 60-mer was first examined using SDS PAGE, where a band around 30.71kDa band is expected to form. Additionally due to Encapsulin's exceptional heat stability the 1.98MDa complex also appears on the gel after SDS denaturation. | ||
+ | [[File:NativeGel.png|thumb|center|upright=3|Native PAGE gel of sfGFP, HexaHistidine-OT1 Encapsulin and HexaHistidine-OT1 Encapsulin sfGFP-tag. On the '''left''' is the fluorescent image of the gel and o the '''right''' is the gel after Coomassie staining. '''Before''' ('''B''') heat purification procedure outlined in '''Purification''' section, '''Supernatant''' ('''S''') after the heat purification procedure. '''Stars''' <nowiki>★</nowiki> show the bands for monomers of HexaHistidine-OT1 Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686002|BBa_K2686000]],[[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686006|BBa_K2686006]]) with sfGFP-tag bound to them, increasing the molecular weight of the complex when compared to sfGFP alone. '''Triangles''' <nowiki>▲</nowiki> signify a 60-mer band to the right. | ||
+ | From left to right: '''(1-2)''' Negative control (cell-free TX-TL expression without DNA), '''(2-4)''' HexaHistidine-OT1 Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686000|BBa_K2686000]]), showing no fluorescence on the left gel, has a band for 60-mer on stained gel (<nowiki>▲</nowiki>). '''(5-6)''' sfGFP protein, the fluorescent bands can be easily seen as large smears on the left. '''(7-8)''' HexaHistidine-OT1 Encapsulin and sfGFP-tag ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686006|BBa_K2686006]]) shown by a <nowiki>★</nowiki>. The difference in height between the bands of sfGFP compared to the <nowiki>★</nowiki> is striking and suggests that the sfGFP-tag binds to the HexaHistidine-OT1 Encapsulin monomers. In addition there seems to be a small amount of 60-mer indicated by <nowiki>▲</nowiki>. '''(9-10)''' Encapsulin ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686001|BBa_K2686001]]) does assemble to form the 60-mer <nowiki>▲</nowiki> as seen on the stained gel. '''(11)''' HexaHistidine-OT1 Encapsulin and sfGFP-tag ([[parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_K2686006|BBa_K2686006]]), on the left the presumed <nowiki>★</nowiki> protein dimer is seen to be higher than the sfGFP in lane '''12''', no particular bands can be identified on the right. '''(12)''' sfGFP, fluorescent band is seen to be lower than for lane '''11'''. | ||
+ | ]] | ||
===DLS Measurements=== | ===DLS Measurements=== |
Revision as of 12:27, 16 October 2018
Encapsulin protein
This is a BioBrick containing the sequence for Thermotoga maritima encapsulin, a bacterial protein nanocompartment which self assembles to form a 60-mer.
Usage and Biology
Encapsulins are versatile proteins found in a variety of different bacteria (Giessen and Silver, 2017). In the case of this specific part derived from Thermotoga maritima, it can be used among other things to deliver cargo, both on the outer surface of the nanoparticle by fusing a peptide in between the 139/140 Amino Acids or the protein's C terminus. A cargo protein can also be loaded by fusing it with a tag binding to Encapsulin's interior surface (Cassidy-Amstutz et al., 2016).
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 77
Illegal BglII site found at 441 - 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal SapI.rc site found at 375
Illegal SapI.rc site found at 406
Characterization
A variety of different characterization techniques were used to assess the properties of the encapsulin protein cage.
Expression
A cell free expression system was used to synthesize the encapsulin proteins in vitro. The TX-TL cell free system is a robust way to express proteins (Sun et al., 2013), and was used by last year's EPFL iGEM team Aptasense.
Assembly
The self assembly of the encapsulin 60-mer was first examined using SDS PAGE, where a band around 30.71kDa band is expected to form. Additionally due to Encapsulin's exceptional heat stability the 1.98MDa complex also appears on the gel after SDS denaturation.
DLS Measurements
References
Cassidy-Amstutz, C., Oltrogge, L., Going, C., Lee, A., Teng, P., Quintanilla, D., East-Seletsky, A., Williams, E. and Savage, D. (2016). Identification of a Minimal Peptide Tag for in Vivo and in Vitro Loading of Encapsulin. Biochemistry, 55(24), pp.3461-3468.
Giessen, T. and Silver, P. (2017). Widespread distribution of encapsulin nanocompartments reveals functional diversity. Nature Microbiology, 2, p.17029.
Putri, R., Allende-Ballestero, C., Luque, D., Klem, R., Rousou, K., Liu, A., Traulsen, C., Rurup, W., Koay, M., Castón, J. and Cornelissen, J. (2017). Structural Characterization of Native and Modified Encapsulins as Nanoplatforms for in Vitro Catalysis and Cellular Uptake. ACS Nano, 11(12), pp.12796-12804.
Shimizu, Y., Inoue, A., Tomari, Y., Suzuki, T., Yokogawa, T., Nishikawa, K. and Ueda, T. (2001). Cell-free translation reconstituted with purified components. Nature Biotechnology, 19(8), pp.751-755.