Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa I20260"
Paul Lubrano (Talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
Group & Author: IONIS_PARIS /La Paillasse/2017 | Group & Author: IONIS_PARIS /La Paillasse/2017 | ||
− | Summary: We transformed BBa_I20260 into pSB1C3 from pSB1K3. | + | Summary: We transformed BBa_I20260 into pSB1C3 from pSB1K3 and sent it to the registry. We thought it was important because the part in PSB1C3 was not available in the registry. This part was very useful as a control for us to characterise BBa_K098997 (pCOLD-GFP) from the iGEM Tokyo 2016 team. |
Method: See the bacterial transformation protocol in our wiki IONIS_PARIS 2017_Lab work_protocols. | Method: See the bacterial transformation protocol in our wiki IONIS_PARIS 2017_Lab work_protocols. |
Latest revision as of 10:12, 1 November 2017
Measurement Kit Test of J23101
Measkit test of J23101
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 7
Illegal NheI site found at 30 - 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 706
Characterization IONIS_PARIS 2017
Group & Author: IONIS_PARIS /La Paillasse/2017
Summary: We transformed BBa_I20260 into pSB1C3 from pSB1K3 and sent it to the registry. We thought it was important because the part in PSB1C3 was not available in the registry. This part was very useful as a control for us to characterise BBa_K098997 (pCOLD-GFP) from the iGEM Tokyo 2016 team.
Method: See the bacterial transformation protocol in our wiki IONIS_PARIS 2017_Lab work_protocols.
Results:
The bacteria transformation worked, we had colonies and we then did a PCR colony (Figure 1) to verify if the GFP was transformed into pSBIC3. We picked different colonies and the positive result was observed in the well nº3 (GFP 1). In conclusion the GFP was successfully transformed into pSB1C3.
Figure 1: PCR colony. A) Ladder, B) mRFP protein generator, C) GFP 1, D) GFP 2, E)GFP 3.