Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2213001"

Line 33: Line 33:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
4 hour graph:
 
4 hour graph:
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d8/4_hours_final.jpeg
+
 
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
20 hour graph:
 
20 hour graph:
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/8/89/Od.jpeg
 
  
 
<br>
 
<br>
figure legend:=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
+
figure legend:
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<u><font size="+0.5">measuring BMC subunit expression</font></u>  
 
<u><font size="+0.5">measuring BMC subunit expression</font></u>  
Line 63: Line 62:
 
from this 22 flask investigation we were able to make surface plots to visualise our findings:
 
from this 22 flask investigation we were able to make surface plots to visualise our findings:
 
<br>
 
<br>
tet - temp graph
 
 
/***2 TEMPERATURE DoE SURFACE PLOTS***
 
 
  
 
img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d8/4_hours_final.jpeg" width="800" height="317"
 
img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2017/d/d8/4_hours_final.jpeg" width="800" height="317"
  
 +
<br>
 
Figure1: A surface plot of the interactions between the concentration of tetracycline inducer (x axis), Temperature after induction (y axis) and Average GFP fluorescence per cell (z axis).
 
Figure1: A surface plot of the interactions between the concentration of tetracycline inducer (x axis), Temperature after induction (y axis) and Average GFP fluorescence per cell (z axis).
 
From this graph, it can be deduced that a lower temperature after induction and a higher tetracyclin concentration in the inducer increases the amount of EutM protein produced per cell.
 
From this graph, it can be deduced that a lower temperature after induction and a higher tetracyclin concentration in the inducer increases the amount of EutM protein produced per cell.
 +
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/ca/Manchesterigem17-IPTG-harvesttime1.png
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/c/ca/Manchesterigem17-IPTG-harvesttime1.png
  
 +
<br>
 
Figure2: This graph is like figure1, except IPTG concentration in the inducer is being compared instead of Tet. IPTG induces the LacUV5 promoter which transcribes the EutS gene. By having a high IPTG concentration in the inducer, the concentration of EutM per cell increases. This implies that the presence of EutS is increasing the stability of the EutM protein. This may be due to the binding of EutSMN proteins to form partially formed microcompartments, potentially improving the stability of EutM protein.
 
Figure2: This graph is like figure1, except IPTG concentration in the inducer is being compared instead of Tet. IPTG induces the LacUV5 promoter which transcribes the EutS gene. By having a high IPTG concentration in the inducer, the concentration of EutM per cell increases. This implies that the presence of EutS is increasing the stability of the EutM protein. This may be due to the binding of EutSMN proteins to form partially formed microcompartments, potentially improving the stability of EutM protein.
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
 
  
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/1/17/Manchesterigem17-Tet-temp1.png
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/1/17/Manchesterigem17-Tet-temp1.png
  
 +
<br>
 
Figure3: The interactions between the concentration of tetracycline inducer (x axis), Harvest time (y axis) and Average GFP fluorescence per cell (z axis).
 
Figure3: The interactions between the concentration of tetracycline inducer (x axis), Harvest time (y axis) and Average GFP fluorescence per cell (z axis).
 
From this graph, it can be seen that a low harvest time and a high harvest time yields the highest EutM synthesis per cell.  
 
From this graph, it can be seen that a low harvest time and a high harvest time yields the highest EutM synthesis per cell.  
 +
<br>
 
<br>
 
<br>
  
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/d/dc/Manchesterigem17-IPTG-temp1.png
  
 
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/d/dc/Manchesterigem17-IPTG-temp1.png
 
 
<br>
 
<br>
 
 
 
Figure4: This graph is like figure3, except IPTG concentration in the inducer is being compared instead of Tetracycline concentration. IPTG induces the LacUV5 promoter which transcribes the EutS gene.
 
Figure4: This graph is like figure3, except IPTG concentration in the inducer is being compared instead of Tetracycline concentration. IPTG induces the LacUV5 promoter which transcribes the EutS gene.
 
At a lower harvest time, IPTG concentration in the inducer has little effect on the EutM concentration (z axis). However, at higher harvest times, IPTG concentration has a significant effect on EutM concentration. We believe that this relationship is caused by the binding of EutS, M and N proteins forming partially formed microcompartments and thus increasing the half-life of the EutM protein.
 
At a lower harvest time, IPTG concentration in the inducer has little effect on the EutM concentration (z axis). However, at higher harvest times, IPTG concentration has a significant effect on EutM concentration. We believe that this relationship is caused by the binding of EutS, M and N proteins forming partially formed microcompartments and thus increasing the half-life of the EutM protein.

Revision as of 22:02, 31 October 2017


Tet_EutMN

Ethanolamine Utilisation (Eut) bacterial micro-compartment (BMC) proteins EutM and EutN from E.coli , placed under the inducible Tetracycline promoter. Also contains RBS, terminators and all tetp components – thus this part alone can be used to synthesise EutM and EutN at varying concentrations, relevant to the experimental task. EutM is tagged with GFP and His6. EutN is tagged with FLAG. See Figure 1.

Manchesterigem17-teteutmngblock-image.png

Tetracycline Promoter

The tetracycline expression system is based on two regulatory elements, the tetracycline repressor protein (TetR) and the tetracycline operator sequence (tetO); both derived form the tetracycline-resistance operon of the E.coli Tn10 transposon. In our part, tetracycline (Tc) can bind rTetR, increasing its affinity for DNA binding. Thus upon Tc addition, rTetR can bind tetO, permitting transcription of any gene under control of the tet promoter. This is illustrated in Figure 2.

Manchesterigem17-tetpromoterdiag1-image.png


Several iGEM teams have previously carried out characterisation and worked with the Tet promoter system. For your interest and research, we recommend looking at the HQ submitted part BBa_R0040 (https://parts.igem.org/Part:BBa_R0040) as a starting point.

EutM and EutN

The Ethanolamine Utilisation (Eut) bacterial micro-compartment (BMC) proteins EutM and EutN from E.coli are clustered together here, as they are found in nature. Coming soon...

Usage and Biology

Although it is possible to use this part for EutM and N expression without further assembly, we do not recommend doing this if the ultimate goal is to produce fully functional Eut BMCs. When forced to produce BMCs, E. coli are placed under a large amount of strain and begin to experience slowed and abnormal growth (see characterisation data below). Therefore, we suggest using a low copy number plasmid eg. pSB4A5 (https://parts.igem.org/Part:pSB4A5), as we have used in our project. By using a low copy number plasmid, cellular stress is minimised, but the experimenter still has the ability to induce BMC formation.

Characterisation

Understanding growth defects upon Eut protein expression 


After establishing our Eut constructs we noticed the cultures grew much slower after the Eut protein expression had been induced. This lead to us investigating how each of our Eut circuits (***reference other biobricks***) affect growth rate after they have been induced.
4 hour graph:



20 hour graph:


figure legend:
measuring BMC subunit expression





Optimising conditions for EutM synthesis using 'Design of Experiments'
To find the optimal conditions of EutM microcompartment formation we used a tool called 'Design of Experiments' to vary a multitude of factors including:

  • concentration of Tetracyclin inducer (induces EutMN synthesis)
  • concentration of IPTG inducer (induces EutS synthesis)
  • Harvest time (time after induction)
  • Temperature
  • Growth Medium (LB and TB)

We determined the concentration of EutM by measuring the GFP fluorescence of the solution and dividing it by the OD of the culture at that time. This gave us the average GFP fluorescence per cell which is proportional to the amount of EutM produced per cell. / from this 22 flask investigation we were able to make surface plots to visualise our findings:

img src="4_hours_final.jpeg" width="800" height="317"


Figure1: A surface plot of the interactions between the concentration of tetracycline inducer (x axis), Temperature after induction (y axis) and Average GFP fluorescence per cell (z axis). From this graph, it can be deduced that a lower temperature after induction and a higher tetracyclin concentration in the inducer increases the amount of EutM protein produced per cell.

Manchesterigem17-IPTG-harvesttime1.png


Figure2: This graph is like figure1, except IPTG concentration in the inducer is being compared instead of Tet. IPTG induces the LacUV5 promoter which transcribes the EutS gene. By having a high IPTG concentration in the inducer, the concentration of EutM per cell increases. This implies that the presence of EutS is increasing the stability of the EutM protein. This may be due to the binding of EutSMN proteins to form partially formed microcompartments, potentially improving the stability of EutM protein.

Manchesterigem17-Tet-temp1.png


Figure3: The interactions between the concentration of tetracycline inducer (x axis), Harvest time (y axis) and Average GFP fluorescence per cell (z axis). From this graph, it can be seen that a low harvest time and a high harvest time yields the highest EutM synthesis per cell.

Manchesterigem17-IPTG-temp1.png


Figure4: This graph is like figure3, except IPTG concentration in the inducer is being compared instead of Tetracycline concentration. IPTG induces the LacUV5 promoter which transcribes the EutS gene. At a lower harvest time, IPTG concentration in the inducer has little effect on the EutM concentration (z axis). However, at higher harvest times, IPTG concentration has a significant effect on EutM concentration. We believe that this relationship is caused by the binding of EutS, M and N proteins forming partially formed microcompartments and thus increasing the half-life of the EutM protein.

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
    Illegal AgeI site found at 2190
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 1516