Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2368027"

Line 4: Line 4:
 
<h3>General</h3>
 
<h3>General</h3>
 
<p>The original Pfus (BBa_K1154001) is 201bp long with three STE12 binding sites, and the STE12 is Pfus’s transcriptional activator in the endogenous GPCR pathways of yeast.</p>
 
<p>The original Pfus (BBa_K1154001) is 201bp long with three STE12 binding sites, and the STE12 is Pfus’s transcriptional activator in the endogenous GPCR pathways of yeast.</p>
<p>In order to enhance the transcription initiation activity of the promoter, we add additional three binding sites(gatgaaacaaacatgaaacgtctgtaatttgaaaca) in the front of the promoter. And we add 5umol/L α pheromone to detect the modified promoter, and the result is shown in fig.2.</p>
+
<p>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/5/5d/T_BIT-China_2017part_K2368026.png</p>
<p>The intensity of modified promoter is about 1/2 of the wild type, which doesn’t match with our expectation. According to Ting-Cheng Su’s[1] result, there are serious limitations in STE12 multimers identifying STE12 binding sites. So when we change the structure of Pfus, the steric hindrance of STE12 may increases and STE12 can't combine the promoter as smoothly as before.</p>  
+
<p>In order to enhance the transcription initiation activity of the promoter, we added additional three binding sites(gatgaaacaaacatgaaacgtctgtaatttgaaacacgcgctgtctca) in the front of the promoter. </p>
 +
<p>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/7/71/T_BIT-China_2017part_K2368027-1.png</p>
 +
<p>fig.2 Sequencing result of original Pfus and mutant Pfus</p>
 +
<p>After the modified promoter assembling into the detection circuit(加个链接), we added 5umol/L α pheromone to detect it, and the result is shown in fig.3.</p>
 +
<p>https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/parts/4/43/T_BIT-China_2017part_7.png</p>
 +
<p>fig.3 The intensity of two kinds of promoters</p>
 +
<p>The intensity of modified promoter was about 1/2 of the wild type, which didn’t match with our expectation. According to Ting-Cheng Su’s[1] result, there were serious limitations in Ste12 multimers identifying Ste12 binding sites. So when we changed the structure of Pfus, the steric hindrance of Ste12 may increases and Ste12 couldn’t combine the promoter as smoothly as before. </p>
 +
<p>But from another point of view, still, we got the new Pfus with different transcription initiation activity. With different promoters, we can apply them in the regulation subsystem according to various situations or wide-ranging needs.</p>
 +
 
 +
<p>This part is an improvement of BBa_K1154001 of 2013 RHIT team.</p>
  
<p>But from another point of view, still, we get the new Pfus with different transcription initiation activity. </p>
 
<h3>Reference</h3>
 
 
<p>[1] Su, T.-C., Tamarkina, E. and Sadowski, I. (2010), Organizational constraints on Ste12 cis-elements for a pheromone response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Journal, 277: 3235–3248. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07728.x</p>
 
<p>[1] Su, T.-C., Tamarkina, E. and Sadowski, I. (2010), Organizational constraints on Ste12 cis-elements for a pheromone response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Journal, 277: 3235–3248. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07728.x</p>
  

Revision as of 15:21, 19 October 2017

Introduction

Pfus(6 Ste12 binding sites)

General

The original Pfus (BBa_K1154001) is 201bp long with three STE12 binding sites, and the STE12 is Pfus’s transcriptional activator in the endogenous GPCR pathways of yeast.

T_BIT-China_2017part_K2368026.png

In order to enhance the transcription initiation activity of the promoter, we added additional three binding sites(gatgaaacaaacatgaaacgtctgtaatttgaaacacgcgctgtctca) in the front of the promoter.

T_BIT-China_2017part_K2368027-1.png

fig.2 Sequencing result of original Pfus and mutant Pfus

After the modified promoter assembling into the detection circuit(加个链接), we added 5umol/L α pheromone to detect it, and the result is shown in fig.3.

T_BIT-China_2017part_7.png

fig.3 The intensity of two kinds of promoters

The intensity of modified promoter was about 1/2 of the wild type, which didn’t match with our expectation. According to Ting-Cheng Su’s[1] result, there were serious limitations in Ste12 multimers identifying Ste12 binding sites. So when we changed the structure of Pfus, the steric hindrance of Ste12 may increases and Ste12 couldn’t combine the promoter as smoothly as before.

But from another point of view, still, we got the new Pfus with different transcription initiation activity. With different promoters, we can apply them in the regulation subsystem according to various situations or wide-ranging needs.

This part is an improvement of BBa_K1154001 of 2013 RHIT team.

[1] Su, T.-C., Tamarkina, E. and Sadowski, I. (2010), Organizational constraints on Ste12 cis-elements for a pheromone response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Journal, 277: 3235–3248. doi:10.1111/j.1742-4658.2010.07728.x


Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]