Revision as of 20:37, 22 October 2016

Mycobacterium Phage Bxb1 gp35, DNA integrase

• Group: ETH Zurich 2016
• Author: Asli Azizoglu
• Summary: We cloned and characterised a codon optimised bxb1 for E.coli, and sent it to the registry as a biobrick. Our biobrick can be found here with a fast degradation tag and here without any degradation tagsPart:BBa_K2116026. The non-codon optimised version can be found here Part:BBa_K907000.

Kinetic Characterisation

We investigated the kinetics of bxb1 flipping using flow cytometry.

Genetic Design

• Bxb1 was expressed under a tet promoter, without any degradation tags. The RBS has a strenght of 1209.69 au (translation rate), as calculated by the Salis RBS Calculator. This construct was cloned on a medium copy plasmid with the p15A replication of origin.
• TetR was expressed under the control of medium-strength constitutive promoter Part:Bba_J23118, and cloned onto a low copy plasmid with pSC101/Rep101 replication of origin.
• We also constructed a dual fluorescence reporter system Part:BBa_K2116024 that expresses GFP when bxb1 flips a directional promoter.

Experimental Setup

• The test construct with bxb1 was transformed together with the reporter construct, and either with TetR or with the empty backbone as control.
• Cells were grown in LB medium for 4 hours, and then transfered to minimal M9 medium with a 1:100 dilution. aTc was added at given concentrations at OD₆₀₀. Samples were taken at the specified time points, spun down and resuspended in PBS at OD₆₀₀ 0.01 and kept on ice until measurement.
• Results are presented as mean fluorescence per cell and the standard error of the mean.

Results

We observed that maximum flipping is reached at around 8h under these conditions. The response correlates with aTc concentration. However compared to the control, where there is no TetR, we see 6-fold less flipping. This could be improved by increasing the concentration of aTc, however we have found that at 8000 ng/μL cell growth was inhibited.

Time and dose response of bxb1 flipping a directional promoter. Induction at OD₆₀₀ 0.5 with aTc at given concentrations. Data measured by flow cytometry at given time points. Values are shown as mean fluorescence per cell, error bars indicate SEM.

Comparison between Codon Optimised and Registry Bxb1 Integrase

We compared the kinetics of our codon optimised bxb1 Part:BBa_K2116026 and the one found previously on the registry Part:BBa_K907000 that was not codon optimised. The same genetic and experimental setup was used as above. The only difference between the two constructs is that the non-codon optimised bxb1 has a weaker RBS, with a strength of 251.82au (translation rate), as calculated by the [Salis RBS Calculator]. Due to this difference in construction we compared each bxb1 to it's own control (see above, Experimental Setup).

We could show that the codon optimised bxb1 could reach ~1/6th flipping compared to control, whereas the non-codon optimised one reached only ~1/260th of its own control. We thus argue that the codon optimised bxb1 is more efficient, especially since the fold increase in efficiency is a lot more than the fold increase in RBS strenght.

Comparison of codon optimised and non-optimised bxb1 flipping efficiency. Test constructs have bxb1 expressed under the Tet promoter, with TetR present in the system. Control doesn't have TetR in the system, and thus constitutively expresses bxb1. While non-codon optimised bxb1 can only reach ~1/260th of the full flipping reached by control, the codon optimised one reaches ~1/6th of its own control. Induction at OD₆₀₀ 0.5 with 2000ng/μL. Data measured by flow cytometry at 16h. Values are shown as mean fluorescence per cell, error bars indicate SEM.

Sequence and Features