Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K2047101"

Line 6: Line 6:
 
<p style="font-size:20px;font-family:'Calibri'">Inspired by Xu’s work and based on keasling’s work, we designed a series of stem loops with different free energy for further use as basic regulatory parts. To measure the regulation effect of stem loop, we constructed the dual-fluorescent reporter system (GFP and mCherry) to test the regulatory effect of various stem-loops.</p>
 
<p style="font-size:20px;font-family:'Calibri'">Inspired by Xu’s work and based on keasling’s work, we designed a series of stem loops with different free energy for further use as basic regulatory parts. To measure the regulation effect of stem loop, we constructed the dual-fluorescent reporter system (GFP and mCherry) to test the regulatory effect of various stem-loops.</p>
 
<p style="font-size:20px;font-family:'Calibri'">The operon is transcribed by its sole promoter and the primary transcript is cleaved into several secondary transcripts by RNase E, a single-stranded, nonspecific endonuclease with preference for cleaving A/U-rich sequence. However, the stability of these secondary transcripts against exonuclease degradation from the 3’ end varied due to their distinct terminal structure. When stem loops inserted in the 3’ end of the upstream gene, it protects its mRNA against the cleavage of exonuclease, increasing the ratio of abundance of the first gene product relative to that of the second gene product. Furthermore, the lower free energy of stem loops are, the more stable the secondary transcripts of the upstream are, tuning the expression of multiple genes.</p>
 
<p style="font-size:20px;font-family:'Calibri'">The operon is transcribed by its sole promoter and the primary transcript is cleaved into several secondary transcripts by RNase E, a single-stranded, nonspecific endonuclease with preference for cleaving A/U-rich sequence. However, the stability of these secondary transcripts against exonuclease degradation from the 3’ end varied due to their distinct terminal structure. When stem loops inserted in the 3’ end of the upstream gene, it protects its mRNA against the cleavage of exonuclease, increasing the ratio of abundance of the first gene product relative to that of the second gene product. Furthermore, the lower free energy of stem loops are, the more stable the secondary transcripts of the upstream are, tuning the expression of multiple genes.</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/05/T--OUC-China--part-expression.jpg" width= "600px" height= "400px" alt="part expression">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/0/05/T--OUC-China--part-expression.jpg" width= "50%" height= "50%" alt="part expression">
 
<p style="font-size:16px;font-family:'Calibri'">Figure 1 shows the expression of fluorescence protein effected by stem loops with different folding free energy. It’s clearly that the difference is significant. Then we measured the quantitative expression on two levels: the transcriptional level and the translational level.</p>
 
<p style="font-size:16px;font-family:'Calibri'">Figure 1 shows the expression of fluorescence protein effected by stem loops with different folding free energy. It’s clearly that the difference is significant. Then we measured the quantitative expression on two levels: the transcriptional level and the translational level.</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/3c/T--OUC-China--part-all.png" width= "600px" height= "400px" alt="part all">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/3/3c/T--OUC-China--part-all.png" width= "50%" height= "50%" alt="part all">
 
<p style="font-size:16px;font-family:'Calibri'">Figure.2 shows the relative expression level of the dual-fluorescence reporter system we designed. The ratio of GFP and mCherry has significant difference both on the transcriptional level and the translational level with different stem-loops.</p>
 
<p style="font-size:16px;font-family:'Calibri'">Figure.2 shows the relative expression level of the dual-fluorescence reporter system we designed. The ratio of GFP and mCherry has significant difference both on the transcriptional level and the translational level with different stem-loops.</p>
  
Line 14: Line 14:
 
<p style="font-size:20px;font-family:'Calibri'">For the convenience of using and measuring the effect of the stem-loop, we also submitted a serious of parts which encode GFP with stem-loop and a RNase site.</p>
 
<p style="font-size:20px;font-family:'Calibri'">For the convenience of using and measuring the effect of the stem-loop, we also submitted a serious of parts which encode GFP with stem-loop and a RNase site.</p>
 
<p style="font-size:20px;font-family:'Calibri'">This part encodes GFP with stem-loop of -30.1 kcal/mol that we designed by ourselves and a RNase site downstream. The effect of transcript protection we measured of the stem-loop and RNase is as follows:</p>
 
<p style="font-size:20px;font-family:'Calibri'">This part encodes GFP with stem-loop of -30.1 kcal/mol that we designed by ourselves and a RNase site downstream. The effect of transcript protection we measured of the stem-loop and RNase is as follows:</p>
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/a/a8/T--OUC-China--basic-005.png" width= "600px" height= "400px" alt="stem loop 10">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/a/a8/T--OUC-China--basic-005.png" width= "50%" height= "50%" alt="stem loop 10">
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b8/T--OUC-China--composite-101.png" width= "600px" height= "400px" alt="GFP-Stem loop 10">
+
<img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2016/b/b8/T--OUC-China--composite-101.png" width= "50%" height= "50%" alt="GFP-Stem loop 10">
 
<p style="font-size:16px;font-family:'Calibri'">Figure 3 Shows the structure of the stem loop of this part with the folding free energy of -30.10 kcal/mol.</p>
 
<p style="font-size:16px;font-family:'Calibri'">Figure 3 Shows the structure of the stem loop of this part with the folding free energy of -30.10 kcal/mol.</p>
 
<p style="font-size:16px;font-family:'Calibri'">Figure 4 Shows the relative expression on RNA and protein level with stem-loop of -30.1 kcal/mol (measured by Mfold) contrast to the control group with no stem-loop. The result is the ratio of upstream gfp to downstream mCherry. Error bars indicate s.d. of mean of experiments in triplicate.</p> (***P value<0.0001, **P value<0.01)  
 
<p style="font-size:16px;font-family:'Calibri'">Figure 4 Shows the relative expression on RNA and protein level with stem-loop of -30.1 kcal/mol (measured by Mfold) contrast to the control group with no stem-loop. The result is the ratio of upstream gfp to downstream mCherry. Error bars indicate s.d. of mean of experiments in triplicate.</p> (***P value<0.0001, **P value<0.01)  

Revision as of 22:13, 19 October 2016


Fluorescent reporter system with stem-loop of -30.1kcal/mol, GFP_stem-loop

Introduction

Inspired by Xu’s work and based on keasling’s work, we designed a series of stem loops with different free energy for further use as basic regulatory parts. To measure the regulation effect of stem loop, we constructed the dual-fluorescent reporter system (GFP and mCherry) to test the regulatory effect of various stem-loops.

The operon is transcribed by its sole promoter and the primary transcript is cleaved into several secondary transcripts by RNase E, a single-stranded, nonspecific endonuclease with preference for cleaving A/U-rich sequence. However, the stability of these secondary transcripts against exonuclease degradation from the 3’ end varied due to their distinct terminal structure. When stem loops inserted in the 3’ end of the upstream gene, it protects its mRNA against the cleavage of exonuclease, increasing the ratio of abundance of the first gene product relative to that of the second gene product. Furthermore, the lower free energy of stem loops are, the more stable the secondary transcripts of the upstream are, tuning the expression of multiple genes.

<img src="T--OUC-China--part-expression.jpg" width= "50%" height= "50%" alt="part expression">

Figure 1 shows the expression of fluorescence protein effected by stem loops with different folding free energy. It’s clearly that the difference is significant. Then we measured the quantitative expression on two levels: the transcriptional level and the translational level.

<img src="T--OUC-China--part-all.png" width= "50%" height= "50%" alt="part all">

Figure.2 shows the relative expression level of the dual-fluorescence reporter system we designed. The ratio of GFP and mCherry has significant difference both on the transcriptional level and the translational level with different stem-loops.

Description

For the convenience of using and measuring the effect of the stem-loop, we also submitted a serious of parts which encode GFP with stem-loop and a RNase site.

This part encodes GFP with stem-loop of -30.1 kcal/mol that we designed by ourselves and a RNase site downstream. The effect of transcript protection we measured of the stem-loop and RNase is as follows:

<img src="T--OUC-China--basic-005.png" width= "50%" height= "50%" alt="stem loop 10"> <img src="T--OUC-China--composite-101.png" width= "50%" height= "50%" alt="GFP-Stem loop 10">

Figure 3 Shows the structure of the stem loop of this part with the folding free energy of -30.10 kcal/mol.

Figure 4 Shows the relative expression on RNA and protein level with stem-loop of -30.1 kcal/mol (measured by Mfold) contrast to the control group with no stem-loop. The result is the ratio of upstream gfp to downstream mCherry. Error bars indicate s.d. of mean of experiments in triplicate.

(***P value<0.0001, **P value<0.01)

Sequence and Features


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
    Illegal NheI site found at 777
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 644
    Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 768