Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1899006"
Stephanieyiu (Talk | contribs) |
Stephanieyiu (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
===Results=== | ===Results=== | ||
The fold change between construct A (pSB3K3-<i>phlFp</i>- BBa_E0240) and negative control (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240), and that of construct C (pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- <i>phlFp</i> -E0240) were both approximately 13.2. Since their RFU are similar, it indicated that there is no cross-talk between <i>lacp</i> and<i>phlFp</i>(<bbpart>(BBa_K1899004</bbpart>). | The fold change between construct A (pSB3K3-<i>phlFp</i>- BBa_E0240) and negative control (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240), and that of construct C (pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- <i>phlFp</i> -E0240) were both approximately 13.2. Since their RFU are similar, it indicated that there is no cross-talk between <i>lacp</i> and<i>phlFp</i>(<bbpart>(BBa_K1899004</bbpart>). | ||
| − | + | <br> | |
[[File:IGEM2016_HKUST_phlFK1899006.png|thumb|600px|center|<b>Fig 1. Comparison on fluorescence expression levels of construct A (BBa_<i>phlFp</i>-E0240) and construct C (BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- <i>phlFp</i> -E0240)</b>. Negative control represents BBa_E0240. Characterization was done using <i>E. coli</i> strain JW0336. Cells were first precultured overnight and were subcultured to mid-log phase where GFP emission measurements were made using an EnVision® multilabel reader. This result was obtained by combining 3 characterization data obtained in 3 different days. Error bar present SD from 3 biological replicates.]] | [[File:IGEM2016_HKUST_phlFK1899006.png|thumb|600px|center|<b>Fig 1. Comparison on fluorescence expression levels of construct A (BBa_<i>phlFp</i>-E0240) and construct C (BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- <i>phlFp</i> -E0240)</b>. Negative control represents BBa_E0240. Characterization was done using <i>E. coli</i> strain JW0336. Cells were first precultured overnight and were subcultured to mid-log phase where GFP emission measurements were made using an EnVision® multilabel reader. This result was obtained by combining 3 characterization data obtained in 3 different days. Error bar present SD from 3 biological replicates.]] | ||
Revision as of 15:35, 18 October 2016
J23101-B0032-lacl-B1006- phlFp-GFP
The construct aims at investigating any interference caused by lacl repressor on promoter phlFp.
Results
The fold change between construct A (pSB3K3-phlFp- BBa_E0240) and negative control (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240), and that of construct C (pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- phlFp -E0240) were both approximately 13.2. Since their RFU are similar, it indicated that there is no cross-talk between lacp andphlFp(BBa_K1899004).
Fig 1. Comparison on fluorescence expression levels of construct A (BBa_phlFp-E0240) and construct C (BBa_J23101-B0032-C0012-B1006- phlFp -E0240). Negative control represents BBa_E0240. Characterization was done using E. coli strain JW0336. Cells were first precultured overnight and were subcultured to mid-log phase where GFP emission measurements were made using an EnVision® multilabel reader. This result was obtained by combining 3 characterization data obtained in 3 different days. Error bar present SD from 3 biological replicates.
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]Illegal NheI site found at 7
Illegal NheI site found at 30 - 21INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]Illegal BglII site found at 1209
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]Illegal BsaI.rc site found at 2007