Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1899005"
(→Results) |
|||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The fold change between<b> pSB3K3-PhlFp - BBa_E0240(A)</b> and negative control<b> (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240)</b> and that of <b>pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0040-B1006- PhlFp -E0240(D)</b> is around 13.2 times and 7.01 times respectively. | The fold change between<b> pSB3K3-PhlFp - BBa_E0240(A)</b> and negative control<b> (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240)</b> and that of <b>pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0040-B1006- PhlFp -E0240(D)</b> is around 13.2 times and 7.01 times respectively. | ||
− | + | <br><br> | |
− | This is due to the toxicity of < | + | This is due to the toxicity of <bbpart>BBa_C0040 <bbpart>(tetR). The toxicity reduces the growth rate of the<i> E. coli</i> containing this plasmid. The strong promoter BBa_J23101 makes this effect more significant when doing the characterisation. Though the data are collected with all OD within the mid-log range, there is still a distance between them, making a significant difference in the RFU. It is ungrounded to say TetR interferes the functionality of <i> PhlFp</i> at this stage. |
− | + | <br> | |
<!-- --> | <!-- --> | ||
<span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> | <span class='h3bb'>Sequence and Features</span> |
Revision as of 23:32, 17 October 2016
J23101-B0032-TetR-B1006- phlFp -GFP
This part is constructed for investigating the effect of tetR over PhlFp.
Results
Fig a) Comparison of Technical Triplicate Results of pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0040-B1006- PhlFp -E0240(D) and pSB3K3-PhlFp- BBa_E0240(A)
The fold change between pSB3K3-PhlFp - BBa_E0240(A) and negative control (pSB3K3-BBa_E0240) and that of pSB3K3-BBa_J23101-B0032-C0040-B1006- PhlFp -E0240(D) is around 13.2 times and 7.01 times respectively.
This is due to the toxicity of BBa_C0040