Revision as of 13:49, 18 September 2015

Sequence coding for Envirowire: Sup35NM with N-terminal CsgAss and C-terminal cytb562

This BioBrick contains the constitutive promoter BBa_J23104 and uses the pSB1C3 backbone. It consists of three genes, a csgA signal sequence, Sup35-NM, and cytochrome b562. The bipartite csgA signal sequence targets the Sec protein export pathway followed by the endogenous curli export system of E.coli allowing our protein to be easily exported into an external medium (Sivanathan and Hochschild, 2012; Sivanathan and Hochschild, 2013). Sup35-NM is derived from the yeast prion protein Sup35p and excludes the C-terminal domain. The N-terminal domain allows self-assembly of functional amyloid (Frederick et al., 2014; Glover et al. 1997). This has previously been discussed by Tessier and Lindquist (2009) who show that two beta-sheets bond together in a self-complimenting ‘steric zipper’ that excludes water, leaving a highly stable parallel beta-sheet with one molecule every 4.7Å. The particular advantage of using Sup35-NM is that in its native state Sup35p has two functional domains, the N and C terminal, separated by the highly charged M domain (Frederick et al., 2014; Glover et al. 1997; Wickner et al., 2007). Thus facilitating the removal of one functional domain in order to add our own functional protein, in this case cytochrome b562 to form a fusion protein.

We chose Cytochrome b562 as the electron carrier to make our amyloid conductive. The structure of cytochrome b562 consists of a single 24kDa subunit containing four nearly parallel alpha helices (Fujiwara, Fnkumori, and Yamanaka, 1993; Mathews et al., 1979). B-type cytochromes are a favourable choice because haem binds in a non-ionic fashion to the two ligands Methionine-7 and Histidine-106 (Xavier et al., 1978). Haem binding has been shown to occur in both the native protein and the denatured protein, although the latter exhibits a modest affinity with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 3μM. This allows the cytochrome to be exported in an unfolded state and haem to be added exogenously to initiate correct folding of the cytochrome by burying hydrophobic side chains (Robinson et al., 1997). Furthermore, haem binding to cytochrome b562 has a high affinity interaction with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 9nM at 25°C (Robinson et al., 1997). This BioBrick has been optimised for use in the VS45 strain of E.coli containing deletions that prevent amyloid from binding to the outside of the cell and increase the rate of protein exiting the cell via the curli export system.

Sequence and Features

Validation

Validation of our fusion protein’s export was achieved using two techniques. Firstly, using a segmented diagnostic Congo Red agar plate with the antibiotics chloramphenicol and ampicillin present in order to select the VS45 strains transformed with our plasmid. As a negative control, we used VS45 with PVS105, as it does not have the ability to export amyloid-forming proteins. These strains were plated in 2 quarter segments of the plate and left to incubate for 24 hours at 37°C. This resulted red VS45 with PVS72 colonies due to binding of Congo Red to the amyloid fibres produced by the colonies, and white colonies of VS45 with PVS105 showing no export of amyloid-forming protein (shown in fig.4). These results confirmed that our protein was being produced and targeted to the curli export pathway by csgA, as well as self-assembling into amyloid fibres.

""Figure.1"".Shows our Congo red plates. The top plate depicts both our negative control plasmid, PVS105 and our BioBrick containing CsgAss and Sup35NM. Whereas the bottom plate shows only VS45 with our BioBrick. The presence of red colonies illustrates the successful formation of amyloid.

To validate the nature of Envirowire, we analysed it through agarose gel electrophoresis. By comparing the sizes of the fragments to a marker we discovered the size of our fragment ( as seen in figure x) to be around 1400 base pairs, matching the actual size of 1339 base pairs of the CsgAss, Sup35NM and Cytb562 sequences. Also, our gel shows a fragment to be about 2000 base pairs, confirming it is PSB1c3 which is 2030 base pairs in size.

""Figure.3"".Shows the agarose gel, following a restrictive digest of our Envirowire BioBrick.

References

Frederick, K., Debelouchina, G., Kayatekin, C., Dorminy, T., Jacavone, A., Griffin, R. and Lindquist, S. (2014). Distinct Prion Strains Are Defined by Amyloid Core Structure and Chaperone Binding Site Dynamics. Chemistry & Biology, 21(2), pp.295-305.

Fujiwara, T., Fnkumori,, Y. and Yamanaka, T. (1993). Halobacterium halobium Cytochrome b-558 and Cytochrome b-562: Purification and Some Properties. J. Biochem., 113, pp.48-54.

Glover, J., Kowal, A., Schirmer, E., Patino, M., Liu, J. and Lindquist, S. (1997). Self-Seeded Fibers Formed by Sup35, the Protein Determinant of [PSI+], a Heritable Prion-like Factor of S. cerevisiae. Cell, 89(5), pp.811-819.

Mathews, F. S., Bethge, P. H., & Czerwinski, E. W. (1979). The structure of cytochrome b562 from Escherichia coli at 2.5 A resolution. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 254(5), 1699-1706.

Robinson, C., Liu, Y., Thomson, J., Sturtevant, J. and Sligar, S. (1997). Energetics of Heme Binding to Native and Denatured States of Cytochrome b 562 †. Biochemistry, 36(51), pp.16141-16146.

Sivanathan, V. and Hochschild, A. (2012). Generating extracellular amyloid aggregates using E. coli cells. Genes & Development, 26(23), pp.2659-2667.

Sivanathan, V. and Hochschild, A. (2013). A bacterial export system for generating extracellular amyloid aggregates. Nat Protoc, 8(7), pp.1381-1390.

Tessier, P. and Lindquist, S. (2009). Unraveling infectious structures, strain variants and species barriers for the yeast prion [PSI+]. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 16(6), pp.598-605.

Wickner, R., Edskes, H., Shewmaker, F. and Nakayashiki, T. (2007). Prions of fungi: inherited structures and biological roles. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 5(8), pp.611-618.

Xavier, A., Czerwinski, E., Bethge, P. and Mathews, F. (1978). Identification of the haem ligands of cytochrome b562 by X-ray and NMR methods. Nature, 275(5677), pp.245-247.