Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1653020"

Revision as of 09:51, 17 September 2015

marA.dev

This device consists of R0011+B0034+K1653006+B0015.

Sequence and Features

Assembly Compatibility:

10
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
12
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
21
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
23
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
25
INCOMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
Illegal AgeI site found at 229
1000
COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]

Export geraniol

Fig. 1: Intracellular geraniol concentrations of E. coli JM109 (WT) and its overexpressing of marA strain, E. coli JM109 (marA).
In this figure, intracellular content of geraniol was less in the strain E. coli JM109 (marA) than the strain E. coli JM109 (WT). The concentrations of intracellular geraniol from E. coli JM109 (marA) was 42.9 μg/ml, which was 40% lower than that from of E. coli JM109 (WT), 72.2 μg/ml. This figure is suggesting that internalized geraniol could be more efficiently exported through AcrAB-TolC efflux pump following the presumed activation of this gene by introducing the activator marA gene.

Geraniol resistance

Fig. 2: Colony formation efficiencies of E. coli JM109 engineered with marA on geraniol overlaid plates. E. coli JM109 and E. coli JM109 (marA) were spotted on LBGMg agar plates in serial ten-fold dilutions (10⁻¹～10⁻⁵), overlaid with geraniol solutions, and incubated at 30°C for 24 h. This figure shows that E. coli JM109 (marA) cells that overexpress the marA product is more survived on geraniol overlay plates than the counterpart control E. coli JM109 wild type cells.

Fig. 3: Comparison of colony numbers after addition of geraniol solution. Time interval for treatment was set every 1 hour from 1 hour to 4 hours. A: E. coli JM109 (WT) + hexane; B: E. coli JM109 (marA) + hexane; C: E. coli JM109 (WT) + geraniol; D: E. coli JM109 (marA) + geraniol. As shown in Figs. 2 A and B, treatment with hexane of E. coli JM109 (WT) and of E. coli JM109 (marA) showed similar colony numbers during these treatment intervals to those of time zero. This result suggests that hexane at this concentration and duration of time for 4hours did not affect both cell growth. In contrast, treatment with geraniol of E. coli JM109 (WT) and of E. coli JM109 (marA) showed toxicities to both strains (Figs. 3 B, C and D). If we watch the colony numbers carefully, E. coli JM109 (marA) had more than E. coli JM109 (WT) during these treatment intervals ((Figs. 3 C and D). These results demonstrate that toxicity of the geraniol was less to the strain E. coli JM109 (marA) than the strain E. coli JM109 (WT).

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 <br>
 This device consists of [https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_R0011 R0011]+[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_B0034 B0034]+[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_K1653006 K1653006]+[https://parts.igem.org/wiki/index.php?title=Part:BBa_B0015 B0015].
-====Export geraniol====
-<br>
-[[File:GC conc fig.png |650px|thumb|center|Fig. 1: Intracellular geraniol concentrations of ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) and its overexpressing of ''marA'' strain, ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'').
-<br>
-In this figure, intracellular content of geraniol was less in the strain ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') than the strain ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT). The concentrations of intracellular geraniol from ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') was 42.9 μg/ml, which was 40% lower than that from of ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT), 72.2 μg/ml. This figure is suggesting that internalized geraniol could be more efficiently exported through AcrAB-TolC efflux pump following the presumed activation of this gene by introducing the activator ''marA'' gene.]]
-====Geraniol resistance====
-[[File:MarA plate assay yoshiharu did.png|750px|thumb|center|Fig. 2: Colony formation efficiencies of E. coli JM109 engineered with marA on geraniol overlaid plates.
-E. coli JM109 and E. coli JM109 (marA) were spotted on LBGMg agar plates in serial ten-fold dilutions (10⁻¹～10⁻⁵), overlaid with geraniol solutions, and incubated at 30°C for 24 h. This figure shows that E. coli JM109 (marA) cells that overexpress the marA product is more survived on geraniol overlay plates than the counterpart control E. coli JM109  wild type cells.
-]]
-[[File:MarA plate assay nishikawa last.png|650px|thumb|center|Fig. 3: Comparison of colony numbers after addition of geraniol solution. Time interval for treatment was set every 1 hour from 1 hour to 4 hours. A: ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) + hexane; B: ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') + hexane; C: ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) + geraniol; D: ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') + geraniol.
-As shown in Figs. 2 A and B, treatment with hexane of ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) and of ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') showed similar colony numbers during these treatment intervals to those of time zero.  This result suggests that hexane at this concentration and duration of time for 4hours did not affect both cell growth. In contrast, treatment with geraniol of ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) and of ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') showed toxicities to both strains (Figs. 3 B, C and D).  If we watch the colony numbers carefully, ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') had more than ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) during these treatment intervals ((Figs. 3 C and D).  These results demonstrate that toxicity of the geraniol was less to the strain ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') than the strain ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT).
- ]]
@@ Line 42: / Line 26: @@
 <partinfo>BBa_K1653020 parameters</partinfo>
 <!-- -->
+====Export geraniol====
+<br>
+[[File:GC conc fig.png |650px|thumb|center|Fig. 1: Intracellular geraniol concentrations of ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) and its overexpressing of ''marA'' strain, ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'').
+<br>
+In this figure, intracellular content of geraniol was less in the strain ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') than the strain ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT). The concentrations of intracellular geraniol from ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') was 42.9 μg/ml, which was 40% lower than that from of ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT), 72.2 μg/ml. This figure is suggesting that internalized geraniol could be more efficiently exported through AcrAB-TolC efflux pump following the presumed activation of this gene by introducing the activator ''marA'' gene.]]
+====Geraniol resistance====
+[[File:MarA plate assay yoshiharu did.png|750px|thumb|center|Fig. 2: Colony formation efficiencies of E. coli JM109 engineered with marA on geraniol overlaid plates.
+E. coli JM109 and E. coli JM109 (marA) were spotted on LBGMg agar plates in serial ten-fold dilutions (10⁻¹～10⁻⁵), overlaid with geraniol solutions, and incubated at 30°C for 24 h. This figure shows that E. coli JM109 (marA) cells that overexpress the marA product is more survived on geraniol overlay plates than the counterpart control E. coli JM109  wild type cells.
+]]
+[[File:MarA plate assay nishikawa last.png|650px|thumb|center|Fig. 3: Comparison of colony numbers after addition of geraniol solution. Time interval for treatment was set every 1 hour from 1 hour to 4 hours. A: ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) + hexane; B: ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') + hexane; C: ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) + geraniol; D: ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') + geraniol.
+As shown in Figs. 2 A and B, treatment with hexane of ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) and of ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') showed similar colony numbers during these treatment intervals to those of time zero.  This result suggests that hexane at this concentration and duration of time for 4hours did not affect both cell growth. In contrast, treatment with geraniol of ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) and of ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') showed toxicities to both strains (Figs. 3 B, C and D).  If we watch the colony numbers carefully, ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') had more than ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT) during these treatment intervals ((Figs. 3 C and D).  These results demonstrate that toxicity of the geraniol was less to the strain ''E. coli'' JM109 (''marA'') than the strain ''E. coli'' JM109 (WT).
+ ]]