Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1632021"
JunKawamura (Talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<partinfo>BBa_K1632021 short</partinfo> | <partinfo>BBa_K1632021 short</partinfo> | ||
| − | a | + | At the first stage of wet experiment, we used the cells which have the plasmid which is Pcon_lasR_TT_Plux_rbs_cmR to characterize the function of rbs_cmR(<partinfo>BBa_K395160</partinfo> by iGEM10_Tokyo_Tech). But the cells showed active growth even in the absence of AHL (Fig. 1.The cells growth with Cm) |
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:Tokyo_Tech Pcon_rbs_rhlR_TT_Plux_rbs_cmR.png|thumb|center|550px|<b>Fig. 1.</b> The cells growth with Cm]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | From the results of this experiment, initially designed circuits showed leaky expression of CmR. Therefore we suspected that there was a leakage in the promoter. So we constructed a new plasmid with an ssrA degradation tag, rbs_cmRssrA. | ||
<!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | <!-- Add more about the biology of this part here | ||
Revision as of 04:14, 17 September 2015
Plux_rbs_CmRssrA
At the first stage of wet experiment, we used the cells which have the plasmid which is Pcon_lasR_TT_Plux_rbs_cmR to characterize the function of rbs_cmR(BBa_K395160 by iGEM10_Tokyo_Tech). But the cells showed active growth even in the absence of AHL (Fig. 1.The cells growth with Cm)
From the results of this experiment, initially designed circuits showed leaky expression of CmR. Therefore we suspected that there was a leakage in the promoter. So we constructed a new plasmid with an ssrA degradation tag, rbs_cmRssrA.
Sequence and Features
Assembly Compatibility:
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]