Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1761003:Design"

 
(the signaling component)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
 
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1761003 short</partinfo>
 
<partinfo>BBa_K1761003 short</partinfo>
Line 9: Line 8:
 
The sequence is redesigned considering codon optimalization. Also restriction sites for biobricking and classical cloning are deleted.
 
The sequence is redesigned considering codon optimalization. Also restriction sites for biobricking and classical cloning are deleted.
  
 +
===Source===
  
 +
mNeonGreen is derived from a tetrameric fluorescent protein from the organism cephalochordate Branchiostoma lanceolatum.
  
  
−
===Source===
+
== The Signaling Component mNeonGreen ==
 +
Two well-known principles to translate a close proximity into a measurable signal are Resonance Energy Transfer and the use of split luciferases (see Figure 1). Even though these principles are very different, both response elements emit light, yielding a measurable signal. After ligand binding, these signaling components yield a virtually immediate response.
  
−
mNeonGreen is derived from a tetrameric fluorescent protein from the organism cephalochordate Branchiostoma lanceolatum.
+
[[File:TU_Eindhoven_Resonance_Energy_Transfer_and_Bioluminiscence.png|800px]]
 +
 
 +
''Figure 1: Resonance energy transfer (A) and split luciferases (B) both translate close proximity into a measurable signal in the form of light.''
 +
 
 +
Resonance Energy Transfer is a physical process which can take place between fluorophores light emission when they are in close proximity (1-10 nm) [1]. An electron which has been transferred to its ‘excited state’ falls back to its ‘ground state’. The energy which is released by the electron falling back to its ground state is normally released in the form of light. In the case of Resonance Energy Transfer, however, the energy of the electron falling back to its ground state is not released in the form of light, but coupled to a transition of an electron in the RET Acceptor to from its ground state to the excited state (see Figure 2).
 +
 +
 
 +
[[File:TU_Eindhoven_RET_Simplified_Energy-level_diagram.png]]
 +
 
 +
''Figure 2: Simplified energy-level diagram of RET. A) Normally, an excited electron falls back to its ground state under the emission of light (a radiative transition). B) In the case of Resonance Electron Transfer, an excited electron in the donor falls back to its ground state. This transition is coupled to the excitation of an electron in the acceptor. This excited electron falls back normally under the emission of light.''
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The efficiency of Resonance Energy Transfer is known to be dependent on a few factors, most importantly the relative orientation of the chromophores as well as the mutual distance of the chromophores [1]. A decreased mutual distance between the donor and acceptor increases the efficiency very significantly. This feature of Resonance Energy Transfer is exploited in the design of our membrane sensor. As a result of the reduced distance between the RET-donor and RET-acceptor, Resonance Energy Transfer is thus more efficient. As a result, relatively more light will be emitted by the acceptor when the ligand is bound. The resulting signal is thus, per definition ratiometric. As a result of ligand binding, intensity of the light emitted by the donor will decrease and intensity of the light emitted by the acceptor will increase (see Figure 3).
 +
 
 +
 +
[[File:TU_Eindhoven_Efficient_energy_transfer.png]]
 +
 
 +
''Figure 3:  A) Efficient energy transfer is not possible since the donor and fluorophore are to remote. B) Efficient energy transfer is possible due to the proximity of the donor and acceptor. As a result, light intensity of the donor decreases whereas light intensity of the acceptor increases.''
  
  
 
===References===
 
===References===
 +
[1] I. Medintz and N. Hildebrandt, Eds., FRET - Förster Resonance Energy Transfer. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2013.

Latest revision as of 18:40, 16 September 2015

mNeonGreen


Assembly Compatibility:
  • 10
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
  • 12
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
  • 21
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
  • 23
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
  • 25
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
  • 1000
    COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]


Design Notes

The sequence is redesigned considering codon optimalization. Also restriction sites for biobricking and classical cloning are deleted.

Source

mNeonGreen is derived from a tetrameric fluorescent protein from the organism cephalochordate Branchiostoma lanceolatum.


The Signaling Component mNeonGreen

Two well-known principles to translate a close proximity into a measurable signal are Resonance Energy Transfer and the use of split luciferases (see Figure 1). Even though these principles are very different, both response elements emit light, yielding a measurable signal. After ligand binding, these signaling components yield a virtually immediate response.

TU Eindhoven Resonance Energy Transfer and Bioluminiscence.png

Figure 1: Resonance energy transfer (A) and split luciferases (B) both translate close proximity into a measurable signal in the form of light.

Resonance Energy Transfer is a physical process which can take place between fluorophores light emission when they are in close proximity (1-10 nm) [1]. An electron which has been transferred to its ‘excited state’ falls back to its ‘ground state’. The energy which is released by the electron falling back to its ground state is normally released in the form of light. In the case of Resonance Energy Transfer, however, the energy of the electron falling back to its ground state is not released in the form of light, but coupled to a transition of an electron in the RET Acceptor to from its ground state to the excited state (see Figure 2).


TU Eindhoven RET Simplified Energy-level diagram.png

Figure 2: Simplified energy-level diagram of RET. A) Normally, an excited electron falls back to its ground state under the emission of light (a radiative transition). B) In the case of Resonance Electron Transfer, an excited electron in the donor falls back to its ground state. This transition is coupled to the excitation of an electron in the acceptor. This excited electron falls back normally under the emission of light.


The efficiency of Resonance Energy Transfer is known to be dependent on a few factors, most importantly the relative orientation of the chromophores as well as the mutual distance of the chromophores [1]. A decreased mutual distance between the donor and acceptor increases the efficiency very significantly. This feature of Resonance Energy Transfer is exploited in the design of our membrane sensor. As a result of the reduced distance between the RET-donor and RET-acceptor, Resonance Energy Transfer is thus more efficient. As a result, relatively more light will be emitted by the acceptor when the ligand is bound. The resulting signal is thus, per definition ratiometric. As a result of ligand binding, intensity of the light emitted by the donor will decrease and intensity of the light emitted by the acceptor will increase (see Figure 3).


TU Eindhoven Efficient energy transfer.png

Figure 3: A) Efficient energy transfer is not possible since the donor and fluorophore are to remote. B) Efficient energy transfer is possible due to the proximity of the donor and acceptor. As a result, light intensity of the donor decreases whereas light intensity of the acceptor increases.


References

[1] I. Medintz and N. Hildebrandt, Eds., FRET - Förster Resonance Energy Transfer. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2013.