Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1378031"
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
− | <p>We transformed the two plasmids into <i>E.coli</i>. Then, | + | <html> |
+ | <p>We transformed the two plasmids into <i>E.coli</i>. Then, 10mM of inducer was applied and the growth rate was measured. Compared with the bacteria carrying blank plasmid, the efficiency of our suicide switch can be evaluated.</p> | ||
− | <figure><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/fa/Peking2014zsy_data.png"><figcaption><b>Figure 5. </b> <b>The growth curves of the <i>E. coli</i> carrying suicide switch and blank plasmid. </b>X axis is the culture time and we get OD<sub>595nm</sub> value every five minutes. Y axis is the OD<sub>595nm</sub> of <i>E. coli</i>. | + | <figure><img src="https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/f/fa/Peking2014zsy_data.png"><figcaption><b>Figure 5. </b> <b>The growth curves of the <i>E. coli</i> carrying suicide switch and blank plasmid. </b>X axis is the culture time and we get OD<sub>595nm</sub> value every five minutes. Y axis is the OD<sub>595nm</sub> of <i>E. coli</i>. 10mM IPTG was added in experimental group <b>(red line)</b> while none of IPTG was added in control group <b>(blue line)</b>. The surrounding light-colored lines are error bars. <b>(a)</b> The growth curves of <i>E. coli</i> carrying suicide switch. <b>(b)</b> The growth curves of <i>E. coli</i> carrying blank plasmid. </figcaption></figure> |
− | <p>The Fig. 5(a) shows that the difference between the OD<sub>595nm</sub> of experimental group and control group is obvious in the late logarithmic phase | + | <p>The <b>Fig. 5(a)</b> shows that the difference between the OD<sub>595nm</sub> of experimental group and control group is obvious in the late logarithmic phase. The <b>Fig. 5(b)</b> shows that the growth curve of the <i>E. coli</i> carrying blank plasmid after the addition of 10mM IPTG is nearly coincident with that without addition of IPTG, excluding the possibility that the toxicity of IPTG leads to the noticeable OD<sub>595nm</sub>’s difference. Hence, the OD<sub>595nm</sub>’s difference should be caused by the slowed growth rate or cell death, and combining the working mechanism of holin and endolysin, we believe the cell death may be the main cause and our suicide switch may have some bactericidal effect.</p> |
− | ==''' | + | <p>In this experiment, every group did not enter the stationary phase and we thought better results could be attained by prolonging culture time. One possible reason for this performance of our suicide switch is that the expression of holin and endolysin is not enough to cause cell lysis. Hence, in order to test the performance of P<sub>lac</sub>, we will construct a plasmid where the expression of GFP is under control of P<sub>lac</sub> and measure the fluorescence intensity after the addition of a gradient of IPTG. According to the results of the experiment above, we will find an appropriate concentration of IPTG to get a better result if necessary. Besides, the relatively low toxicity of holin and endolysin may be another cause and we can choose the CcdA/CcdB Type II Toxin-antitoxin system instead in our future work because it have been proved that the CcdB, a topoisomerase poison targeting the GyrA subunit of DNA gyrase, shows strong toxicity to <i>E. coli</i>. </p> |
+ | |||
+ | </html> | ||
+ | |||
+ | =='''References'''== | ||
<p>[1]Gründling, A., Bläsi, U., & Young, R. (2000). Biochemical and genetic evidence for three transmembrane domains in the class I holin, lambda <i>S</i>. <i>Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275</i>(2), 769-776.</p> | <p>[1]Gründling, A., Bläsi, U., & Young, R. (2000). Biochemical and genetic evidence for three transmembrane domains in the class I holin, lambda <i>S</i>. <i>Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275</i>(2), 769-776.</p> | ||
<p>[2]Young, R., Wang, I. N., & Roof, W. D. (2000). Phages will out: strategies of host cell lysis. <i>Trends in microbiology, 8</i>(3), 120-128.</p> | <p>[2]Young, R., Wang, I. N., & Roof, W. D. (2000). Phages will out: strategies of host cell lysis. <i>Trends in microbiology, 8</i>(3), 120-128.</p> |
Revision as of 02:51, 18 October 2014
Holin from lambda phage
Holin is a 105-amino-acid-residue cytoplasmic membrane protein with three transmembrane domains, naturally expressed by double-stranded lambada phage. Holin will oligomerize and form a hole on the inner membrane of host bacteria at a certain time at an allele-specific time. And then the formation of hole will help Endolysin, a kind of lysozyme, come out from cytoplasm to periplasm to degrade peptidoglycan and inhibit the respiration by eliminating proton gradient.
Sequence and Features
- 10COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[10]
- 12COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[12]
- 21COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[21]
- 23COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[23]
- 25COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[25]
- 1000COMPATIBLE WITH RFC[1000]
Usage and Biology
Holin is a generic term to describe a group of small proteins produced by double-stranded DNA bacteriophage to trigger holes formation at the end of lytic cycle. In our project, we design our suicide switch based on the λ lysis model. The S holin, also called S105, encoded by S gene, a dual-start motif of λ phage, is an 105-amino-acid-residue CM protein with three transmembrane domains (TMD)[1]. S107, also called antiholin, is the other protein encoded by S gene, differing from the S holin only by the Met-Lys N-terminal extension. However, this difference confers to S107 an extra positive charge, which prevents its TMD1 from inserting into the CM[2]. Additionally, as its name suggests, S107 can bind to S105 and inhibit its function specifically[3]. In λ lysis system, S107 and S105 are encoded by S gene at ratio of approximately 1:2, which is defined by the two RNA structure, and if the amount of S107 is increased relative to S105, the 'lysis time' will be delayed[4]. The inhibition function of S107 can be subverted by collapsing proton motive force, which also allow insertion of TMD1 of S107 into CM, instantly increasing the amount of active holin by making previously inactive S107 - S105 complexes functional (Fig. 1).
Characterization
We choose λ lysis system to construct suicide switch due to its high efficiency and natural occurrence, and we introduce both endolysin and holin because of their cooperativity in cell lysis, which improves the performance of our suicide switch. In our design, endolysin is controlled by a constitutive promoter while holin by inducible promoter, Plac, because high concentration of holin can cause cell death alone (Fig. 4).
We transformed the two plasmids into E.coli. Then, 10mM of inducer was applied and the growth rate was measured. Compared with the bacteria carrying blank plasmid, the efficiency of our suicide switch can be evaluated.
The Fig. 5(a) shows that the difference between the OD595nm of experimental group and control group is obvious in the late logarithmic phase. The Fig. 5(b) shows that the growth curve of the E. coli carrying blank plasmid after the addition of 10mM IPTG is nearly coincident with that without addition of IPTG, excluding the possibility that the toxicity of IPTG leads to the noticeable OD595nm’s difference. Hence, the OD595nm’s difference should be caused by the slowed growth rate or cell death, and combining the working mechanism of holin and endolysin, we believe the cell death may be the main cause and our suicide switch may have some bactericidal effect.
In this experiment, every group did not enter the stationary phase and we thought better results could be attained by prolonging culture time. One possible reason for this performance of our suicide switch is that the expression of holin and endolysin is not enough to cause cell lysis. Hence, in order to test the performance of Plac, we will construct a plasmid where the expression of GFP is under control of Plac and measure the fluorescence intensity after the addition of a gradient of IPTG. According to the results of the experiment above, we will find an appropriate concentration of IPTG to get a better result if necessary. Besides, the relatively low toxicity of holin and endolysin may be another cause and we can choose the CcdA/CcdB Type II Toxin-antitoxin system instead in our future work because it have been proved that the CcdB, a topoisomerase poison targeting the GyrA subunit of DNA gyrase, shows strong toxicity to E. coli.
References
<p>[1]Gründling, A., Bläsi, U., & Young, R. (2000). Biochemical and genetic evidence for three transmembrane domains in the class I holin, lambda S. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275(2), 769-776.[2]Young, R., Wang, I. N., & Roof, W. D. (2000). Phages will out: strategies of host cell lysis. Trends in microbiology, 8(3), 120-128.
[3]Bläsi, U., Chang, C. Y., Zagotta, M. T., Nam, K. B., & Young, R. (1990). The lethal lambda S gene encodes its own inhibitor. The EMBO journal, 9(4), 981.
[4]Bläsi, U., Nam, K., Hartz, D., Gold, L., & Young, R. (1989). Dual translational initiation sites control function of the lambda S gene. The EMBO journal, 8(11), 3501.