Difference between revisions of "Part:BBa K1442100:Experience"

Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
===Applications of BBa_K1442100===
 
===Applications of BBa_K1442100===
 +
'''Figure 5. 3’ UTR and Reverse GFP general construct depiction.''' Plasmid containing reverse GFP and 3’ UTR is depicted below. This was used to characterize RdRp and mRdRp activity in E. coli. 3’ UTRs were interchangeable and are referred to as S3, R5 and C2/HP. 3’ UTRs and Reverse GFP are biobrick compatible. For clarity, biobrick prefix and suffix sequences not shown.
 +
 +
To characterize RdRp and mRdRp activity, co-transformation of the two plasmids with the relevant constructs (Figures 4 & 5) was performed. Table 1 summarizes the experiments and relevant 3’ UTRs tested. Data was obtained using the Tecan micro plate reader
 +
 +
 +
https://static.igem.org/mediawiki/2014/0/0d/Graph1hcv.png
  
 
Figure 6. Characterization of mRdRp and RdRp activity with S3, R5 and C2/HP 3’ UTRs. Data was collected at different time points using Tecan Microplate reader. Controls also present: (IPTG + RBS + GFP) and NEB only.  
 
Figure 6. Characterization of mRdRp and RdRp activity with S3, R5 and C2/HP 3’ UTRs. Data was collected at different time points using Tecan Microplate reader. Controls also present: (IPTG + RBS + GFP) and NEB only.  
Line 20: Line 26:
  
 
Figure 8. RNA dependent RNA polymerase activity following induction at 0.2 and 0.4 OD. Rates were extracted by linear regression and is displayed. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. Rdrp Ni: Non induced, Rdrp I: Induced, mRdRp follows the same conventions.  
 
Figure 8. RNA dependent RNA polymerase activity following induction at 0.2 and 0.4 OD. Rates were extracted by linear regression and is displayed. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. Rdrp Ni: Non induced, Rdrp I: Induced, mRdRp follows the same conventions.  
 
This part has been extensively tested by the Warwick iGEM Team 2014, we have managed to document this part extensively with the results obtained depicted above. In terms of optimizing the chances of obtaining stable transformants, we recommend following the protocols that are found on our website.
 
  
 
===User Reviews===
 
===User Reviews===

Revision as of 20:33, 15 October 2014

This experience page is provided so that any user may enter their experience using this part.
Please enter how you used this part and how it worked out.

Applications of BBa_K1442100

Figure 5. 3’ UTR and Reverse GFP general construct depiction. Plasmid containing reverse GFP and 3’ UTR is depicted below. This was used to characterize RdRp and mRdRp activity in E. coli. 3’ UTRs were interchangeable and are referred to as S3, R5 and C2/HP. 3’ UTRs and Reverse GFP are biobrick compatible. For clarity, biobrick prefix and suffix sequences not shown.

To characterize RdRp and mRdRp activity, co-transformation of the two plasmids with the relevant constructs (Figures 4 & 5) was performed. Table 1 summarizes the experiments and relevant 3’ UTRs tested. Data was obtained using the Tecan micro plate reader


Graph1hcv.png

Figure 6. Characterization of mRdRp and RdRp activity with S3, R5 and C2/HP 3’ UTRs. Data was collected at different time points using Tecan Microplate reader. Controls also present: (IPTG + RBS + GFP) and NEB only.

Table 1. RNA dependent RNA polymerase activity following induction at 0.2 and 0.4 OD, relative to control wells (not induced at 0.2 and 0.4 OD). Error bars indicate standard error.

Hcv_table_5.png

Horizontal axis depicts various different points (1-9: due to the nature of the analysis time in seconds is not displayed). RdRp induction at 0.2 and 0.4 OD at points 1-3 indicates initial activity and relative increase in fluorescence output. Initial RdRp activity then decays following induction, with decrease in fluorescence activity at both OD 0.2 and 0.4. Conclusively, results suggest initial induction of RdRp activity causes a relative increase in fluorescence with a stabilization/decrease thereafter.

Rdrp_linear_graph.png

Figure 7. RNA dependent RNA polymerase activity following induction at 0.2 and 0.4 OD, relative to control wells (not induced at 0.2 and 0.4 OD).

Rdrpgraph3.png

Figure 8. RNA dependent RNA polymerase activity following induction at 0.2 and 0.4 OD. Rates were extracted by linear regression and is displayed. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean. Rdrp Ni: Non induced, Rdrp I: Induced, mRdRp follows the same conventions.

User Reviews

UNIQ5487dadd9e37d6c9-partinfo-00000000-QINU UNIQ5487dadd9e37d6c9-partinfo-00000001-QINU